Warrior General Games

Originally posted by MattyP
Originally posted by RTJakarta

Originally posted by MattyP


Cairo Emperors
Conakry Coyotes
Angola Blood Diamonds
Tsavo Maneaters
Angola Spider Monkeez

hax


I looked at game logs ...

How do you bring up past season info?

Originally posted by RTJakarta
Originally posted by MattyP

Originally posted by RTJakarta


Originally posted by MattyP



Cairo Emperors
Conakry Coyotes
Angola Blood Diamonds
Tsavo Maneaters
Angola Spider Monkeez

hax


I looked at game logs ...

I debated on it. I'm just on a campus computer printing out a paper and killing some time before philosophy/history/math.


Fuck Philosophy. It's really bustin' my baawwllls right now!

find a player on a team from S3 or S4 and look at their game logs from that season.

Originally posted by eterry87
Originally posted by RTJakarta

Originally posted by MattyP


Originally posted by RTJakarta



Originally posted by MattyP




Cairo Emperors
Conakry Coyotes
Angola Blood Diamonds
Tsavo Maneaters
Angola Spider Monkeez

hax


I looked at game logs ...

I debated on it. I'm just on a campus computer printing out a paper and killing some time before philosophy/history/math.


Fuck Philosophy. It's really bustin' my baawwllls right now!

Yeah, I should probably pay more attention. Teacher be talkin' bout Descartes and I'm like "Fuck this, I'll do my Japanese homework."

Originally posted by eterry87
Originally posted by RTJakarta

Originally posted by MattyP


Originally posted by RTJakarta



Originally posted by MattyP




Cairo Emperors
Conakry Coyotes
Angola Blood Diamonds
Tsavo Maneaters
Angola Spider Monkeez

hax


I looked at game logs ...

I debated on it. I'm just on a campus computer printing out a paper and killing some time before philosophy/history/math.


Fuck Philosophy. It's really bustin' my baawwllls right now!

Edit: misread what you wrote

Originally posted by Hokiemon
find a player on a team from S3 or S4 and look at their game logs from that season.

yep. You can use my center to look at the LOL history. He's an OG Legionnaire (meaning original gangsta, not offensive guard).

So you're an offensive guard?

Originally posted by Chugga34
So you're an offensive guard?

you could say that.

Originally posted by MattyP
Originally posted by Chugga34

So you're an offensive guard?

you could say that.

just plain offensive imo

I personally think Descartes wasn't really a great philosopher. I really don't have much trust for many of the Catholic philosophers since they seem to always just try to backwards rationalize things from the standpoint of there being a god (I can perceive there is a god so there must be a god. I can think of perfection so there must be perfection which is automatically embodied by this god). His duality argument was also kind of weak. I didn't dislike Aquinas though. I may not have read enough but I thought his stuff was pretty good.

My favorites were Hume (On Benevolence), Albert Camus (Absurdism), RW Emerson (his philosophies on power... great stuff, applicable today), his friend HD Thoreau (Civil Disobedience), and who can forget Immanuel Kant (Categorical Imperative stuff mostly)?

I also didn't like JS Mill's amoral philosophy at all, preferred Pojman's response to Rand's Ethical Egoism, and Plato really just rubbed me the wrong way, especially with The Republic (it seems he and I agree on a lot of the same stuff, but what he says just aggravates me... I like his predecessor and prodigy, just not him )

I really enjoyed my philosophy class on one hand, but on the other I found it really dumb. After reading the Tao Te Ching, I found all the answers I had and all of the philosophy stuff was mostly just people feeding their egos.

Originally posted by soapbox
I personally think Descartes wasn't really a great philosopher. I really don't have much trust for many of the Catholic philosophers since they seem to always just try to backwards rationalize things from the standpoint of there being a god (I can perceive there is a god so there must be a god. I can think of perfection so there must be perfection which is automatically embodied by this god). His duality argument was also kind of weak. I didn't dislike Aquinas though. I may not have read enough but I thought his stuff was pretty good.

My favorites were Hume (On Benevolence), Albert Camus (Absurdism), RW Emerson (his philosophies on power... great stuff, applicable today), his friend HD Thoreau (Civil Disobedience), and who can forget Immanuel Kant (Categorical Imperative stuff mostly)?

I also didn't like JS Mill's amoral philosophy at all, preferred Pojman's response to Rand's Ethical Egoism, and Plato really just rubbed me the wrong way, especially with The Republic (it seems he and I agree on a lot of the same stuff, but what he says just aggravates me... I like his predecessor and prodigy, just not him )

I really enjoyed my philosophy class on one hand, but on the other I found it really dumb. After reading the Tao Te Ching, I found all the answers I had and all of the philosophy stuff was mostly just people feeding their egos.

So like....do you wanna do my class for me?

Originally posted by soapbox
I personally think Descartes wasn't really a great philosopher. I really don't have much trust for many of the Catholic philosophers since they seem to always just try to backwards rationalize things from the standpoint of there being a god (I can perceive there is a god so there must be a god. I can think of perfection so there must be perfection which is automatically embodied by this god). His duality argument was also kind of weak. I didn't dislike Aquinas though. I may not have read enough but I thought his stuff was pretty good.

My favorites were Hume (On Benevolence), Albert Camus (Absurdism), RW Emerson (his philosophies on power... great stuff, applicable today), his friend HD Thoreau (Civil Disobedience), and who can forget Immanuel Kant (Categorical Imperative stuff mostly)?

I also didn't like JS Mill's amoral philosophy at all, preferred Pojman's response to Rand's Ethical Egoism, and Plato really just rubbed me the wrong way, especially with The Republic (it seems he and I agree on a lot of the same stuff, but what he says just aggravates me... I like his predecessor and prodigy, just not him )

I really enjoyed my philosophy class on one hand, but on the other I found it really dumb. After reading the Tao Te Ching, I found all the answers I had and all of the philosophy stuff was mostly just people feeding their egos.

HOLY CRAP!!! What has happened to this forum? Did I stet into some worm-hole and end up at some tea party?

I feel dirty...I'm going to get a beer.

Originally posted by RTJakarta
Originally posted by soapbox

I personally think Descartes wasn't really a great philosopher. I really don't have much trust for many of the Catholic philosophers since they seem to always just try to backwards rationalize things from the standpoint of there being a god (I can perceive there is a god so there must be a god. I can think of perfection so there must be perfection which is automatically embodied by this god). His duality argument was also kind of weak. I didn't dislike Aquinas though. I may not have read enough but I thought his stuff was pretty good.

My favorites were Hume (On Benevolence), Albert Camus (Absurdism), RW Emerson (his philosophies on power... great stuff, applicable today), his friend HD Thoreau (Civil Disobedience), and who can forget Immanuel Kant (Categorical Imperative stuff mostly)?

I also didn't like JS Mill's amoral philosophy at all, preferred Pojman's response to Rand's Ethical Egoism, and Plato really just rubbed me the wrong way, especially with The Republic (it seems he and I agree on a lot of the same stuff, but what he says just aggravates me... I like his predecessor and prodigy, just not him )

I really enjoyed my philosophy class on one hand, but on the other I found it really dumb. After reading the Tao Te Ching, I found all the answers I had and all of the philosophy stuff was mostly just people feeding their egos.

So like....do you wanna do my class for me?

If you want summaries you can list some authors and excerpts and I could help you out I guess.

And majech - I actually love discussing philosophy, dating, and just the fun things in life. Unfortunately, most of the time I'm stuck with SheVegas doing everything he can to try and somehow hurt the LOLs.

Not saying this to take a shot at SheVegas, but if you look at this forum, like 90% of the posts (and probably 95-99% of SheVegas') are about the LOLs in some regard. I mean whereas the attention does mean you're doing something right as a team (all success comes with detractors), it's also pretty discouraging for any sort of a mix of cultures here. I'm sure everyone (this includes SheVegas... I doubt SheVegas is a bad person who's really like this in all aspects of his life) here has some wonderful insights on things... I've never met someone who hasn't had the capability of giving me a new perspective. And not just that, I love just shooting the shit with people (online or in real life).

Originally posted by soapbox
I personally think Descartes wasn't really a great philosopher. I really don't have much trust for many of the Catholic philosophers since they seem to always just try to backwards rationalize things from the standpoint of there being a god (I can perceive there is a god so there must be a god. I can think of perfection so there must be perfection which is automatically embodied by this god). His duality argument was also kind of weak. I didn't dislike Aquinas though. I may not have read enough but I thought his stuff was pretty good.

My favorites were Hume (On Benevolence), Albert Camus (Absurdism), RW Emerson (his philosophies on power... great stuff, applicable today), his friend HD Thoreau (Civil Disobedience), and who can forget Immanuel Kant (Categorical Imperative stuff mostly)?

I also didn't like JS Mill's amoral philosophy at all, preferred Pojman's response to Rand's Ethical Egoism, and Plato really just rubbed me the wrong way, especially with The Republic (it seems he and I agree on a lot of the same stuff, but what he says just aggravates me... I like his predecessor and prodigy, just not him )

I really enjoyed my philosophy class on one hand, but on the other I found it really dumb. After reading the Tao Te Ching, I found all the answers I had and all of the philosophy stuff was mostly just people feeding their egos.

I always preferred Yogi Berra myself.

Originally posted by mikelj
Originally posted by soapbox

I personally think Descartes wasn't really a great philosopher. I really don't have much trust for many of the Catholic philosophers since they seem to always just try to backwards rationalize things from the standpoint of there being a god (I can perceive there is a god so there must be a god. I can think of perfection so there must be perfection which is automatically embodied by this god). His duality argument was also kind of weak. I didn't dislike Aquinas though. I may not have read enough but I thought his stuff was pretty good.

My favorites were Hume (On Benevolence), Albert Camus (Absurdism), RW Emerson (his philosophies on power... great stuff, applicable today), his friend HD Thoreau (Civil Disobedience), and who can forget Immanuel Kant (Categorical Imperative stuff mostly)?

I also didn't like JS Mill's amoral philosophy at all, preferred Pojman's response to Rand's Ethical Egoism, and Plato really just rubbed me the wrong way, especially with The Republic (it seems he and I agree on a lot of the same stuff, but what he says just aggravates me... I like his predecessor and prodigy, just not him )

I really enjoyed my philosophy class on one hand, but on the other I found it really dumb. After reading the Tao Te Ching, I found all the answers I had and all of the philosophy stuff was mostly just people feeding their egos.

I always preferred Yogi Berra myself.
At least Berra answered questions unlike Hokie Dokie.