Got to defend my Conference, so here goes:
I don't think strict interconference records are necessarily indicative of which conference is better. For example, if you set the pairings up so that W1 played E5, W2 played E6, W3 played E7 etc. you would expect the West to win all eight games until the pairing got past W12-E16 and started on W13-E1, W14-E2, etc. The East would probably clobber the West in those 4 games, but all the 1-12 West teams should be able to beat an East team seeded 4 places below them. The result would be an 8-4 edge for West over East, but wouldn't necessarily indicate that the West clearly had the stronger teams.
In that vein, before the interconference games started, these were the standings:
WESTW1. Twin City Wildcats (15-0)
W2. Northwest Arkansas Naturals (12-3)
W3. Hammond Bayou Bengals (12-3)
W4. San Diego Bolts (11-4)
W5. Oakland Nation (11-4)
W6. Tampa Bay Greyhounds (10-5)
W7. LUElinks LUEshis (9-6)
W8. Austin Alcoholics (9-6)
W9. Laredo Lesbians (8-7)
W10. Farkistan Squirrels (7-8)
W11. Texas Bigga Bois (5-10)
W12. Auckland Raiders (3-12)
W13. Houston Cougars (3-12)
W14. Kingston Sidewinders (3-12)
W15. Lynchburg Lightning (2-13)
W16. Nic Cage 4-Ever<3 (0-15)
EASTE1. Toronto Turtles (15-0)
E2. The Fighting Farvas (14-1)
E3. Atlanta Purple Penguins (13-2)
E4. Tupelo Kings (11-4)
E5. Fulton County Massacre (10-5)
E6. New York Grizzlies (10-5)
E7. Frunkis Town Virus (9-6)
E8. Beaver City Crabs (8-7)
E9. Baton Rouge Bayou Bengals (7-8)
E10. Murfreesboro Taints (6-9)
E11. KingsTalk Angerswords (6-9)
E12. Chicago Wolves (5-10)
E13. Key Biscayne Sabercats (3-12)
E14. Twin City Cobras (2-13)
E15. Tampa Bay Paladins (1-14)
E16. Niagara Rapids (0-15)
The matchups were set this way with the favored team's conference as the third column:
W1---E11--->W
W2---E3---->W
W3---E7---->W
W4---E8---->W
W5---E6---->W
W6---E15--->W
W7---E10--->W
W8---E5---->E
W9---E9---->even
W10---E1--->E
W11---E14-->W
W12---E12-->even
W13---E4--->E
W14---E13-->E
W15---E16-->W
W16---E2--->E
So if things held to form, the West should have won 9, the East 5, and presumably the conferences would have split the tossups. Therfore, based on the matchups, the West SHOULD have had a FOUR game advantage in wins over the East, but only had 2. To me, this means the East outperformed the West.
For reference, here are the games that did NOT hold form based on seedings:
Toss-ups:Laredo (W) beat Baton Rouge (E)
Chicago (E) beat Auckland (W)
Upsets:W14 Kingston beat E13 Key Biscayne
E6 New York beat W5 Oakland
E3 Atlanta beat W2 Northwest Arkansas
So I think the East's performance above what would be expected can be argued as evidence that it is actually the EAST that is the superior conference.
Two final points:
(1) Just because the straight 9-7 edge for the West doesn't prove its superiority, neither does this. It's just a bunch of number crunching to argue about but we'll never really know the truth without a LOT more information than we currently have.
(2) Yes, I have WAAAAAY too much time on my hands....