100-0 good enough for you Chiv? 
KellerFox
offline
offline
Originally posted by KellerFox
Sahara Death Stalkers vs. Mozambique Starvin Marvins -104.5
If the Marvins dont cover than Chivas has to retire his DT
The Marvins 2 failed to cover... 101-0
TISK TISK TISK
Sahara Death Stalkers vs. Mozambique Starvin Marvins -104.5
If the Marvins dont cover than Chivas has to retire his DT
The Marvins 2 failed to cover... 101-0
TISK TISK TISK
Last edited Oct 3, 2008 14:26:29
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by KellerFox
100-0 good enough for you Chiv?
HA HA the REAL Marvis won their game 101 to 0
good day for the marvins teams
100-0 good enough for you Chiv?
HA HA the REAL Marvis won their game 101 to 0
good day for the marvins teams
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by KellerFox
Originally posted by KellerFox
Sahara Death Stalkers vs. Mozambique Starvin Marvins -104.5
If the Marvins dont cover than Chivas has to retire his DT
The Marvins 2 failed to cover... 101-0
TISK TISK TISK
hey you came up with that not us
Originally posted by KellerFox
Sahara Death Stalkers vs. Mozambique Starvin Marvins -104.5
If the Marvins dont cover than Chivas has to retire his DT
The Marvins 2 failed to cover... 101-0
TISK TISK TISK
hey you came up with that not us
Robbnva
offline
offline
plus when you played them they scored 14 on you and you couldn't score 100 so what you got to say now
KellerFox
offline
offline
Originally posted by indyeagle308
well you were right about the frogs, sadly
Yall have the talent to be a great team, it just doesnt always manifest on the field. It seems yall show up and make statements in the big games but then disappear in the ones that are truely within your grasp of winning.
well you were right about the frogs, sadly
Yall have the talent to be a great team, it just doesnt always manifest on the field. It seems yall show up and make statements in the big games but then disappear in the ones that are truely within your grasp of winning.
indyeagle308
offline
offline
Originally posted by KellerFox
Originally posted by indyeagle308
well you were right about the frogs, sadly
Yall have the talent to be a great team, it just doesnt always manifest on the field. It seems yall show up and make statements in the big games but then disappear in the ones that are truely within your grasp of winning.
hopefully we can figure out why that happens sooner than later lol
Originally posted by indyeagle308
well you were right about the frogs, sadly
Yall have the talent to be a great team, it just doesnt always manifest on the field. It seems yall show up and make statements in the big games but then disappear in the ones that are truely within your grasp of winning.
hopefully we can figure out why that happens sooner than later lol
Crixtala
offline
offline
Originally posted by Robbnva
plus when you played them they scored 14 on you and you couldn't score 100 so what you got to say now
At that point we weren't running up scores. We had pretty tight "play it safe" settings in the AI, which didn't allow for much scoring and allowed for better field position for the other teams. We've pretty much knocked those setttings out of our AI the past two weeks.
Not trying to make excuses though, the real Marvins will be known when we finally play a real game against each other.
plus when you played them they scored 14 on you and you couldn't score 100 so what you got to say now
At that point we weren't running up scores. We had pretty tight "play it safe" settings in the AI, which didn't allow for much scoring and allowed for better field position for the other teams. We've pretty much knocked those setttings out of our AI the past two weeks.
Not trying to make excuses though, the real Marvins will be known when we finally play a real game against each other.
Robbnva
offline
offline
Originally posted by Crixtala
Originally posted by Robbnva
plus when you played them they scored 14 on you and you couldn't score 100 so what you got to say now
At that point we weren't running up scores. We had pretty tight "play it safe" settings in the AI, which didn't allow for much scoring and allowed for better field position for the other teams. We've pretty much knocked those setttings out of our AI the past two weeks.
Not trying to make excuses though, the real Marvins will be known when we finally play a real game against each other.
and you lose
Originally posted by Robbnva
plus when you played them they scored 14 on you and you couldn't score 100 so what you got to say now
At that point we weren't running up scores. We had pretty tight "play it safe" settings in the AI, which didn't allow for much scoring and allowed for better field position for the other teams. We've pretty much knocked those setttings out of our AI the past two weeks.
Not trying to make excuses though, the real Marvins will be known when we finally play a real game against each other.
and you lose
Ben Sanderson
offline
offline
GG.
Shit... we didn't show solid. We gave up 42. It's my D and I'm not happy right now.
I'm going to go drink
Shit... we didn't show solid. We gave up 42. It's my D and I'm not happy right now.
I'm going to go drink
PP
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ben Sanderson
GG.
Shit... we didn't show solid. We gave up 42. It's my D and I'm not happy right now.
I'm going to go drink
Understand your frustration. Sometimes a team just hits things right.
GG.
Shit... we didn't show solid. We gave up 42. It's my D and I'm not happy right now.
I'm going to go drink
Understand your frustration. Sometimes a team just hits things right.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
