Warrior General Games

Voodoo will lose to Horns, don't worry about it.

Originally posted by PyscoJester13


I just have a feeling that your H-Town game is going to be one of those WTF games where you have better stats, but they have a few key plays that give them the chance to put it away in the end. Watch the TO's in this game, they will be the deciding factor. I may be wrong on this but we will see. Good Luck to both of the teams involved in this game though, should be a good one.


We'll see. I didn't get a chance to gameplan and scout quite as much as I wanted to last night. Planned on doing it during the "quiet" hours of work last night but we had a double fatality accident at about midnight that I was on until about 0600. Then I had to finish my DWI paperwork from 2130 earlier and left the PD at about 0830. I just got done working on the defense and hopefully I have us competitive.

Originally posted by lawdawg95
Rochester v. Omaha

Rochester is slowly showing people they belong on the big stage. I thought Omaha was making improvements . . . . . Can they take on and defeat the newcomer? Not likely.

Rochester 59-24


I think 35-10 sounds more reasonable.

Originally posted by JerryStegmaier
Originally posted by lawdawg95

Rochester v. Omaha

Rochester is slowly showing people they belong on the big stage. I thought Omaha was making improvements . . . . . Can they take on and defeat the newcomer? Not likely.

Rochester 59-24


I think 35-10 sounds more reasonable.

Why? We hung 90. Surely y'all can score more than 35.

Good luck Hitmen. I hope for a close game and this will be only the 2nd game I will watch through the whole thing instead of looking at the score first.

Originally posted by shaun123987
Good luck Hitmen. I hope for a close game and this will be only the 2nd game I will watch through the whole thing instead of looking at the score first. Same to the Roughnecks and I just hope we can hang.

All I am pulling for is a legit sim on both sides. I don't want to lose OR win by a jacked up sim.

Originally posted by lawdawg95

Why? We hung 90. Surely y'all can score more than 35.


Yeah, but we're not the Roughnecks. We're comparable to Austin Longhorns and they beat Omaha 48-13.

Originally posted by JerryStegmaier
Originally posted by lawdawg95


Why? We hung 90. Surely y'all can score more than 35.


Yeah, but we're not the Roughnecks. We're comparable to Austin Longhorns and they beat Omaha 48-13.

I think you will. We may have been able to get more, but we made some changes for that game to try some things out.

Originally posted by Kendog
Originally posted by JerryStegmaier

Originally posted by lawdawg95



Why? We hung 90. Surely y'all can score more than 35.


Yeah, but we're not the Roughnecks. We're comparable to Austin Longhorns and they beat Omaha 48-13.

I think you will. We may have been able to get more, but we made some changes for that game to try some things out.

Oddly enough so did we...and they didn't work like we would've liked.

I don't know what your all fired up about, you were *suppose* to win that game you know...the only reason you won by that much was because of what we were trying.

Jesus. Some of you have a pretty loose definition of "fired up".

Look, you got 90pts hung on your ass. Stop trying to write it off as an "experiment".

I wouldn't "experiment" when you play Thunder or they're likely to hang 120 on you.

I guess this was a failed "experiment" with Cover 1 which made your D-Line get their ass handed to them?

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4139758

And this was an "experiment" on a new tactic for special teams player alignment. . .

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4136502

This one to?

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4138973

And if you weren't in Cover 1 then your CB wouldn't have got toasted here right?

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4138219

This "new tactic" must have been what made everyone on your defense slower than the HB on this play. . . . I wouldn't use that one again. . .
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4138055
Because it didn't work here either. . .
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4138484


Looks like Cover 2 didn't work either, you're running out of "experiments" that might work. . .
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4138664

If you're dumb enough to line up with a 2 CB set to defend 3 wides you deserve to get 90 thrown on you. . .
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4139286

Here, your CB just sucks. . .
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4139450

Did you have your Safeties set on "Avoid The Ball Carrier" tactic on this play? I wouldn't try that again either.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4139514

Maybe you shouldn't have experimented with "+2 Put It On The Ground Gloves of Chance"
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4139544



You can blame it on a super secret new thing you were "trying out" all you want but you can't explain away getting worked over in every aspect of the game by an "experiment".

I wasn't worked up or excited about it until you started running your mouth about how it was all your fault you got beat badly.

Originally posted by lawdawg95

I wouldn't "experiment" when you play Thunder or they're likely to hang 120 on you.

+1

Originally posted by lawdawg95

And this was an "experiment" on a new tactic for special teams player alignment. . .

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4136502


Great Scott! I'd love to see my KR pull something like that.

Originally posted by lawdawg95

Looks like Cover 2 didn't work either, you're running out of "experiments" that might work. . .
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=145337&pbp_id=4138664


Your HB shrugged of a NT? Damn.