Originally posted by Sarg01
Originally posted by KevinM
Can you post the power ranking breakdowns again? I love that stuff. It always makes more sense than the predictions themselves IMO.
Just to be clear, my ranking system is not associated with the rankings in this thread. The largest component of my system is roster strength, and in-game results are always referenced back to something. Stats reference back to conference-wide averages. Margin of victories reference back to strength of opponent.
It has the advantage of earlier accuracy and markedly less volatility, but it has a couple of downsides too. The biggest of them is it's not automated, so it takes me about 2 hours to do all the data entry. The next biggest is that since results aren't the largest component that record only indirectly influences the rankings. A 3-3 team can absolutely be ranked below a 2-4 team, etc.
I don't intend to take anything personal and give you grief over them. I jsut htink they're cool.
Originally posted by KevinM
Can you post the power ranking breakdowns again? I love that stuff. It always makes more sense than the predictions themselves IMO.
Just to be clear, my ranking system is not associated with the rankings in this thread. The largest component of my system is roster strength, and in-game results are always referenced back to something. Stats reference back to conference-wide averages. Margin of victories reference back to strength of opponent.
It has the advantage of earlier accuracy and markedly less volatility, but it has a couple of downsides too. The biggest of them is it's not automated, so it takes me about 2 hours to do all the data entry. The next biggest is that since results aren't the largest component that record only indirectly influences the rankings. A 3-3 team can absolutely be ranked below a 2-4 team, etc.
I don't intend to take anything personal and give you grief over them. I jsut htink they're cool.