Right, but picking the Gangsters over Tokyo shouldn't count. . .
Eric the Great of Antarctica
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gyuri1
Right, but picking the Gangsters over Tokyo shouldn't count. . .
LOL with that reasoning how does picking the fishermen over osaka count? hehe
Right, but picking the Gangsters over Tokyo shouldn't count. . .
LOL with that reasoning how does picking the fishermen over osaka count? hehe
Gyuri1
offline
offline
B/c I said 7-0 and not 6-0. . .c'mon, work with me here. I'm just trying a little self-justification to explain away my inability to count.
TurboBoxer
offline
offline
hey man tried to get you that 47-0 score like you predicated....53-0, we got a little carried away.
edit
also what happened to the R'backs this season? not in the forums, games that should be closer in score....
edit
also what happened to the R'backs this season? not in the forums, games that should be closer in score....
Last edited Oct 3, 2008 12:12:27
big_poppa2x
offline
offline
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Rip U. Rheadoff
offline
offline
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
TurboBoxer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
Rip U. Rheadoff
offline
offline
Originally posted by TurboBoxer
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
Your matchup with them was one of the ones I looked at. I saw lots that could be taken advantage of on both sides of the ball.
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
Your matchup with them was one of the ones I looked at. I saw lots that could be taken advantage of on both sides of the ball.
Gyuri1
offline
offline
Shhhhhhhh. If you don't hush up, I'm going to have to tell the Dunk about the weaknesses we found in their game planning.
Originally posted by TurboBoxer
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
You are of course correct. We have two young & new coordinators whom I think are learning rapidly in the Fiery Cauldron we call AA4...I went with new blood there and untried, b/c hell, we all have to learn somewhere right?
Besides, at this point, we've set a team record with 4 consecutive wins before today's thrashing, so I'm rather proud of the Hurricanes atm, lol.
Thanks for not being nasty about the win too,
, it is appreciated dude.
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
You are of course correct. We have two young & new coordinators whom I think are learning rapidly in the Fiery Cauldron we call AA4...I went with new blood there and untried, b/c hell, we all have to learn somewhere right?
Besides, at this point, we've set a team record with 4 consecutive wins before today's thrashing, so I'm rather proud of the Hurricanes atm, lol.
Thanks for not being nasty about the win too,
, it is appreciated dude.TurboBoxer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Gyuri1
Shhhhhhhh. If you don't hush up, I'm going to have to tell the Dunk about the weaknesses we found in their game planning.
LOL....their levels?
Originally posted by GmanV2
Thanks for not being nasty about the win too,, it is appreciated dude.
yea we're not nasty about winning in Zeta....before the game though, anything goes
Shhhhhhhh. If you don't hush up, I'm going to have to tell the Dunk about the weaknesses we found in their game planning.
LOL....their levels?
Originally posted by GmanV2
Thanks for not being nasty about the win too,
, it is appreciated dude.yea we're not nasty about winning in Zeta....before the game though, anything goes
Last edited Oct 3, 2008 19:45:35
Rip U. Rheadoff
offline
offline
Originally posted by GmanV2
Originally posted by TurboBoxer
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
You are of course correct. We have two young & new coordinators whom I think are learning rapidly in the Fiery Cauldron we call AA4...I went with new blood there and untried, b/c hell, we all have to learn somewhere right?
Besides, at this point, we've set a team record with 4 consecutive wins before today's thrashing, so I'm rather proud of the Hurricanes atm, lol.
Thanks for not being nasty about the win too,, it is appreciated dude.
Seriously I didn't mean to come across as nasty if I did. I realize you guys are a work in progress which is why I thought we'd win more handily than the original prediction. You obviously have the Canes headed in the right direction though.
Originally posted by TurboBoxer
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
You are of course correct. We have two young & new coordinators whom I think are learning rapidly in the Fiery Cauldron we call AA4...I went with new blood there and untried, b/c hell, we all have to learn somewhere right?
Besides, at this point, we've set a team record with 4 consecutive wins before today's thrashing, so I'm rather proud of the Hurricanes atm, lol.
Thanks for not being nasty about the win too,
, it is appreciated dude.Seriously I didn't mean to come across as nasty if I did. I realize you guys are a work in progress which is why I thought we'd win more handily than the original prediction. You obviously have the Canes headed in the right direction though.
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by GmanV2
Originally posted by TurboBoxer
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
You are of course correct. We have two young & new coordinators whom I think are learning rapidly in the Fiery Cauldron we call AA4...I went with new blood there and untried, b/c hell, we all have to learn somewhere right?
Besides, at this point, we've set a team record with 4 consecutive wins before today's thrashing, so I'm rather proud of the Hurricanes atm, lol.
Thanks for not being nasty about the win too,, it is appreciated dude.
Seriously I didn't mean to come across as nasty if I did. I realize you guys are a work in progress which is why I thought we'd win more handily than the original prediction. You obviously have the Canes headed in the right direction though.
Thx bro and I didn't take it that way completely. I'm actually deployed now, so those guys don't have me there full time and I think it's actually helped...lol.
Originally posted by GmanV2
Originally posted by TurboBoxer
Originally posted by Rip U. Rheadoff
Originally posted by big_poppa2x
i know thats why i changed the score. i originally had 28 for the bulls. i was damn close on a couple scores.
Like I said earlier in the thread though I'd have been sorely disappointed if we'd only beaten the Canes by 14. Some people saw the game as being close but I didn't think the matchup would be that close.
the canes need major work on their off and def AI....at least when we played them they did
You are of course correct. We have two young & new coordinators whom I think are learning rapidly in the Fiery Cauldron we call AA4...I went with new blood there and untried, b/c hell, we all have to learn somewhere right?
Besides, at this point, we've set a team record with 4 consecutive wins before today's thrashing, so I'm rather proud of the Hurricanes atm, lol.
Thanks for not being nasty about the win too,
, it is appreciated dude.Seriously I didn't mean to come across as nasty if I did. I realize you guys are a work in progress which is why I thought we'd win more handily than the original prediction. You obviously have the Canes headed in the right direction though.
Thx bro and I didn't take it that way completely. I'm actually deployed now, so those guys don't have me there full time and I think it's actually helped...lol.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
