Warrior General Games

Sigh;

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=167838

Originally posted by TheRooster
Sigh;

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=167838



Try having some fun....let your QB run back punts. See if your fat guard can kick a field goal...What's the worst that could happen? You only score 140?

Originally posted by midastouch1269
Originally posted by TheRooster

Sigh;

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=167838



Try having some fun....let your QB run back punts. See if your fat guard can kick a field goal...What's the worst that could happen? You only score 140?

Now that would just be mean. Imagine a team that has everyone playing as far out of position as possible beating you handily 140-0. If that don't make you want to quit, I don't know what would.

Obviously a team losing by 200 points hasn't grasped the concept of scouting, so Im sure they would have no idea that "Pancake-O-Matic" isn't your usual kicker....

Originally posted by midastouch1269
Obviously a team losing by 200 points hasn't grasped the concept of scouting, so Im sure they would have no idea that "Pancake-O-Matic" isn't your usual kicker....

You're probably right. Do it Rooster. I want to see some slow TD runs by a C returning kicks.

Winning by 200 is only fleeting happiness

Originally posted by oronis
Originally posted by midastouch1269

Obviously a team losing by 200 points hasn't grasped the concept of scouting, so Im sure they would have no idea that "Pancake-O-Matic" isn't your usual kicker....

You're probably right. Do it Rooster. I want to see some slow TD runs by a C returning kicks.

Do it Rooster.

The Eagles won by 230.

Originally posted by midastouch1269

Try having some fun....let your QB run back punts. See if your fat guard can kick a field goal...What's the worst that could happen? You only score 140?

Sadly, it comes down to points for and against. Why should my team want to take a chance and "have fun" and only score 140 instead of 200+ if it means the difference between a 2nd and 3rd place seeding for the playoffs, or the possibility of making more cash by hosting an extra playoff game?

This is what happens when everyone wants to be an owner, but isn't willing to pony up hundreds of dollars (or hours and hours of referrals) in order to make a team dominated by your own players. We have too many teams, and not enough talent. IN the East, there is an obvious top 4 that have built teams over a couple of seasons and recruited for the long-term, a half-dozen in the middle that are still in the process of finding talent, and then everyone else is also-rans who are either incompetent, or decided to slow-build and not care about winning games this season (or next season, or the season after that).

Sounds like they are moving all the gutted teams all the way down next year so this won't be a problem in the near future plus more than the 2 teams a year will move up. With all the gutted teams everywhere I wouldn't be shocked if all the playoff teams moved up

Originally posted by monkeymelt
Sounds like they are moving all the gutted teams all the way down next year so this won't be a problem in the near future plus more than the 2 teams a year will move up. With all the gutted teams everywhere I wouldn't be shocked if all the playoff teams moved up

This will suck for my Canada BBB team, but it's good for the competitive teams in Canada A...or should I say Canada soon to be AA.

Hell, we may end up in AAA.

I hope it's not level-based, because I think a lot of us play above our level.

Originally posted by GIEFF
I hope it's not level-based, because I think a lot of us play above our level.

We should do some more scrimmage games against high level teams and see if we can beat any of them. Our last one I played an offense I would never run, just to observe a large sample of one set of plays.

I really dont want to end up in AA. The last time I was there I promised my sponsor I wouldn't be back....