I don't know guys...they gave up 33 points to a 2-3 Tucson team that NOBODY has said should have made the top 8 in the power rankings. The difference? A 58.5 yard FG by their kicker. They allowed 3.6 yards/carry to Tucson who isn't exactly a powerhouse, and their pass defense was scattered, and only managed a couple of sacks. The defense was clearly run down in the 3rd and 4th quarters as evidenced by the increased yards/carry allowed. If you want to look at records alone, why even do a power ranking? You can just look at the A7 west conference page and see who's where and BOOM, you're done.
Bigpump
offline
offline
Hell, I say give it to em! The Jacks prefer the underdog role anyway.
But good job on the write-ups...and I agree, if you are just gonna go by records why do a power rankings
But good job on the write-ups...and I agree, if you are just gonna go by records why do a power rankings
Last edited Sep 30, 2008 00:58:36
ANDY_VIGLIOTTI_ISAJOKE
offline
offline
Originally posted by mcgovern10
If you want to look at records alone, why even do a power ranking? You can just look at the A7 west conference page and see who's where and BOOM, you're done.
man makes a good point
If you want to look at records alone, why even do a power ranking? You can just look at the A7 west conference page and see who's where and BOOM, you're done.
man makes a good point
panther17
offline
offline
Originally posted by mcgovern10
If you want to look at records alone, why even do a power ranking? You can just look at the A7 west conference page and see who's where and BOOM, you're done.
Normally I agree but how many times do you see the only undefeated team in the conference who happens to have beaten the current number 1 team and played a tough schedule get a number 2 seed instead of the number 1?
If you want to look at records alone, why even do a power ranking? You can just look at the A7 west conference page and see who's where and BOOM, you're done.
Normally I agree but how many times do you see the only undefeated team in the conference who happens to have beaten the current number 1 team and played a tough schedule get a number 2 seed instead of the number 1?
Last edited Sep 30, 2008 06:13:13
FairForever
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bigpump
Hell, I say give it to em! The Jacks prefer the underdog role anyway.
But good job on the write-ups...and I agree, if you are just gonna go by records why do a power rankings
Ehh, I don't even care.
It hardly matters at this point. What matters is being #1 on the power rankings at the end of the season.
That being said, it would be a nice gesture, but we're just hoping to go 8-0 (would have to beat Portland) heading into another tough 2-game stretch against the Longhorns and Mustangs.
Hell, I say give it to em! The Jacks prefer the underdog role anyway.
But good job on the write-ups...and I agree, if you are just gonna go by records why do a power rankings
Ehh, I don't even care.
It hardly matters at this point. What matters is being #1 on the power rankings at the end of the season.
That being said, it would be a nice gesture, but we're just hoping to go 8-0 (would have to beat Portland) heading into another tough 2-game stretch against the Longhorns and Mustangs.
Modok
offline
offline
Originally posted by FairForever
Originally posted by Bigpump
Hell, I say give it to em! The Jacks prefer the underdog role anyway.
But good job on the write-ups...and I agree, if you are just gonna go by records why do a power rankings
Ehh, I don't even care.
It hardly matters at this point. What matters is being #1 on the power rankings at the end of the season.
That being said, it would be a nice gesture, but we're just hoping to go 8-0 (would have to beat Portland) heading into another tough 2-game stretch against the Longhorns and Mustangs.
Fair, I rode your ass hard when you all first came into the league regarding the way the Elves acted. But I have to say, through your actions and those of the team, the Elves public perception has changed. You posts now are very well articulated and enjoyable to read.
Just wanted to give you some kudos since I was so quick to call you out before.
Originally posted by Bigpump
Hell, I say give it to em! The Jacks prefer the underdog role anyway.
But good job on the write-ups...and I agree, if you are just gonna go by records why do a power rankings
Ehh, I don't even care.
It hardly matters at this point. What matters is being #1 on the power rankings at the end of the season.
That being said, it would be a nice gesture, but we're just hoping to go 8-0 (would have to beat Portland) heading into another tough 2-game stretch against the Longhorns and Mustangs.
Fair, I rode your ass hard when you all first came into the league regarding the way the Elves acted. But I have to say, through your actions and those of the team, the Elves public perception has changed. You posts now are very well articulated and enjoyable to read.
Just wanted to give you some kudos since I was so quick to call you out before.
rj414
offline
offline
+1Originally posted by Modok
Originally posted by FairForever
Originally posted by Bigpump
Hell, I say give it to em! The Jacks prefer the underdog role anyway.
But good job on the write-ups...and I agree, if you are just gonna go by records why do a power rankings
Ehh, I don't even care.
It hardly matters at this point. What matters is being #1 on the power rankings at the end of the season.
That being said, it would be a nice gesture, but we're just hoping to go 8-0 (would have to beat Portland) heading into another tough 2-game stretch against the Longhorns and Mustangs.
Fair, I rode your ass hard when you all first came into the league regarding the way the Elves acted. But I have to say, through your actions and those of the team, the Elves public perception has changed. You posts now are very well articulated and enjoyable to read.
Just wanted to give you some kudos since I was so quick to call you out before.
+1
Originally posted by FairForever
Originally posted by Bigpump
Hell, I say give it to em! The Jacks prefer the underdog role anyway.
But good job on the write-ups...and I agree, if you are just gonna go by records why do a power rankings
Ehh, I don't even care.
It hardly matters at this point. What matters is being #1 on the power rankings at the end of the season.
That being said, it would be a nice gesture, but we're just hoping to go 8-0 (would have to beat Portland) heading into another tough 2-game stretch against the Longhorns and Mustangs.
Fair, I rode your ass hard when you all first came into the league regarding the way the Elves acted. But I have to say, through your actions and those of the team, the Elves public perception has changed. You posts now are very well articulated and enjoyable to read.
Just wanted to give you some kudos since I was so quick to call you out before.
+1
Serenity
offline
offline
Originally posted by mcgovern10
The difference? A 58.5 yard FG by their kicker.
What. You mean that's something unexpected?
The difference? A 58.5 yard FG by their kicker.
What. You mean that's something unexpected?
FairForever
offline
offline
Originally posted by mcgovern10
I don't know guys...they gave up 33 points to a 2-3 Tucson team that NOBODY has said should have made the top 8 in the power rankings. The difference? A 58.5 yard FG by their kicker. They allowed 3.6 yards/carry to Tucson who isn't exactly a powerhouse, and their pass defense was scattered, and only managed a couple of sacks. The defense was clearly run down in the 3rd and 4th quarters as evidenced by the increased yards/carry allowed. If you want to look at records alone, why even do a power ranking? You can just look at the A7 west conference page and see who's where and BOOM, you're done.
Well, it's better than having two losses
Anyway, it really doesn't matter. This isn't the BCS, fortunately.
I don't know guys...they gave up 33 points to a 2-3 Tucson team that NOBODY has said should have made the top 8 in the power rankings. The difference? A 58.5 yard FG by their kicker. They allowed 3.6 yards/carry to Tucson who isn't exactly a powerhouse, and their pass defense was scattered, and only managed a couple of sacks. The defense was clearly run down in the 3rd and 4th quarters as evidenced by the increased yards/carry allowed. If you want to look at records alone, why even do a power ranking? You can just look at the A7 west conference page and see who's where and BOOM, you're done.
Well, it's better than having two losses
Anyway, it really doesn't matter. This isn't the BCS, fortunately.
Last edited Oct 1, 2008 20:48:44
Mr. Moses
offline
offline
We find new and improved ways to lose every time it counts. But we're learning. And getting better.
By the way, GG Elves.
By the way, GG Elves.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
