Originally posted by dlee1019
Speaking of that, what's up the NTs? They don't seem very effective unless they seriously out-lvl opponents. Why don't they penetrate the O-line more?
You know forcefull penetration is frowned upon in MOST civilised countries...
Ah, NT's?
Main issue is Maths. 3 Olinemen at 54 or 57 blocking (plus the odd 51 Fullback) against a DT at 54 and an NT at 54. Numbers don't stack up in favour of the DT's. That said I normally judge the interior linemens success on the ypc in the middle and the LB's tackle numbers. If the DT's can stop the C or G's releasing to the LB's then their job is done - succesfully.
NT/DT is a tough position to track effectiveness other than opposition rushing and W/L.
Speaking of that, what's up the NTs? They don't seem very effective unless they seriously out-lvl opponents. Why don't they penetrate the O-line more?
You know forcefull penetration is frowned upon in MOST civilised countries...
Ah, NT's?
Main issue is Maths. 3 Olinemen at 54 or 57 blocking (plus the odd 51 Fullback) against a DT at 54 and an NT at 54. Numbers don't stack up in favour of the DT's. That said I normally judge the interior linemens success on the ypc in the middle and the LB's tackle numbers. If the DT's can stop the C or G's releasing to the LB's then their job is done - succesfully.
NT/DT is a tough position to track effectiveness other than opposition rushing and W/L.
Last edited Sep 23, 2008 07:53:11
