Warrior General Games

Originally posted by bhall43
Question about Rough Cover. Maybe someone has seen different but I have yet to see it fire on any defender in zone defense. Is that correct or has someone seen it happen? Corndog?

nm answered my own question. it does in fact fire in zone defense.

https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/559778/834266

https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/559778/834433

Originally posted by Corndog
Unfortunately, a lot of people think "go pure pass, spam four plays, win every game by 50 points" isn't exactly fun or compelling gameplay.

You say this like it's a bad thing.

Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
Here are some interesting numbers on interception rates. Seems to be a lot of hysteria over pretty little imo.

Pro
4658 attempts
108 interceptions
2%

Vet
10567 attempts
393 interceptions
3.7%

Money Shot (Whoville Whos) 1.3%
Alessandra Ambrosio (Madison Bulldogs) 2.1%
Koofray Jones (Oakland Ozone) 4.5%

Tyler Wesley (Blood, Sweat & Beers) 1.5%
Eli Manning (Bronx Bombers) 1.5%
Brody Murdoch II (Kentucky Mountaineers) 1.9%
Poetry In Motion (Bloody Slaughterhouse) 2%
The Blue Raja (Hartford Marauders) 3.7%
Levi Acker (Oakland Haters) 4.6%

my vet QB has thrown 4ints in 500+ throws ints haven't really been an issue so far this season.

Originally posted by rackhound
my pro QB has thrown 4ints in 500+ throws hasn't really been an issue so far this season.

Those are actually right in the NFL recent historical range of about 3-4% of passes

My superstar through 7 pick up games has thrown 14 interceptions. 100 heart apparently just makes you braver.

Originally posted by bhall43
My superstar through 7 pick up games has thrown 14 interceptions. 100 heart apparently just makes you braver.

Sounds like you made Brett Favre Jr.

Originally posted by Danthesportsman
Sounds like you made Brett Favre Jr.

thats what i was thinkin. arm strength probs too low yet tho.

I guess what's annoying about intercepting is when you work 75 plus and teams with half that investment ninja balls out of the air like they are Deon Sanders on roids and go into super Saiyan mode.

Originally posted by holt1dj
I guess what's annoying about intercepting is when you work 75 plus and teams with half that investment ninja balls out of the air like they are Deon Sanders on roids and go into super Saiyan mode.

just having 75 intercepting stat doesn't get you interceptions. the players physical abilities put them in the position to make the interception and the intercepting stat just increases the odds on the dice roll for the catch similar to CIT for WRs.

Originally posted by Sov.
just having 75 intercepting stat doesn't get you interceptions. the players physical abilities put them in the position to make the interception and the intercepting stat just increases the odds on the dice roll for the catch similar to CIT for WRs.

Yep, you need vertical, awareness, and prob quick to break on ball too... a lot factors into getting a Int

Originally posted by Sov.
just having 75 intercepting stat doesn't get you interceptions. the players physical abilities put them in the position to make the interception and the intercepting stat just increases the odds on the dice roll for the catch similar to CIT for WRs.

This x1000

All my Vader LB builds have always had 30 int, although they get +15 with EOTP. He had 18 last season.

Originally posted by Sov.
just having 75 intercepting stat doesn't get you interceptions. the players physical abilities put them in the position to make the interception and the intercepting stat just increases the odds on the dice roll for the catch similar to CIT for WRs.

I'm not saying this is wrong because both types of builds could work, but I noticed a very pronounced increase in INTs simply by raising the INT skill. High Awareness and High INT do seem to have the effect you'd imagine.

LBs might be more in the Physical build side to get into position, but CBs are naturally pretty close.

Originally posted by Xars
I'm not saying this is wrong because both types of builds could work, but I noticed a very pronounced increase in INTs simply by raising the INT skill. High Awareness and High INT do seem to have the effect you'd imagine.

LBs might be more in the Physical build side to get into position, but CBs are naturally pretty close.




make a CB with 20 fw, 20 sprint, 20 quickness, and 100 INT and i will make a CB with 70 fw, 70 sprint, 70 quickness and 20 INT and we will see who gets more INTs lol

Originally posted by william78
Those are actually right in the NFL recent historical range of about 3-4% of passes

here's the thing... upon first glance that looks ok BUT if you break down the %s against CPU teams vs good pass defenses the difference is staggering. I'd say against CPU teams it's like 1-2%, but against good humans it's probably closer to 10% which is absurdly high. Sure it averages out correctly, but the differences are just way too much between good and bad. We'll have a 10 TD, 0 INT game against CPU, 2 or 3 TD game, 4 or 5 INTs against a good human).

The difference in completions % is astronomical too (usually like 30-40% comp % agaist good teams, 60-75% against bad CPU teams). The only reason these numbers look ok ON AVERAGE is because the top teams are putting up INSANE numbers against CPU.

today #1 tier J-Man vs us (usually top 2 or 3 in-tier for Pro, arguably the best QB in pro) - 9 INT game between the two teams, and they weren't all thrown in double coverage, a lot of 1v1 INTs. https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/560206

passing is as bad as it ever has been on this game

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
here's the thing... upon first glance that looks ok BUT if you break down the %s against CPU teams vs good pass defenses the difference is staggering. I'd say against CPU teams it's like 1-2%, but against good humans it's probably closer to 10% which is absurdly high. Sure it averages out correctly, but the differences are just way too much between good and bad.

The difference in completions % is astronomical too (usually like 30-40% comp % agaist good teams, 60-75% against bad CPU teams). The only reason these numbers look ok ON AVERAGE is because the top teams are putting up INSANE numbers against CPU.

today #1 tier J-Man vs us (usually top 2 or 3 in-tier for Pro, arguably the best QB in pro) - 9 INT game between the two teams, and they weren't all thrown in double coverage, a lot of 1v1 INTs. https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/560206



Instead of "like" show some actual researched facts.