User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > Working as Intended
Page:
 
fish11th
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ahrens858
loldpride


Is that all you say? god you really suck at posting...

someone should count how many times you say some variation of lolu, or loldpride etc. It's annoying, you must be a kid.

 
StoutOne
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by 5STAR
honestly I know what arcade is doing...revolutionize I don't know about that. More like play a style that is incredibly unlike football and push GLB to the limits

gotta hand it to you because I think it will work wonderfully and will be almost impossible to stop. Teams are just not built to handle 10 WRs and score 100 every game.


If it's a threat, mid season trades, dump LB's for CB's....not a big deal tbh.
 
StinkCheese
offline
Link
 
i give this thread a +10
 
StinkCheese
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by fish11th
Is that all you say? god you really suck at posting...

someone should count how many times you say some variation of lolu, or loldpride etc. It's annoying, you must be a kid.



sup multi sup
 
Ahrens858
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by fish11th
Is that all you say? god you really suck at posting...

someone should count how many times you say some variation of lolu, or loldpride etc. It's annoying, you must be a kid.



considering it sums up the lol @ dpride in this thread ill post it as many times as i want.
 
Dpride59
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rygar
if you do its not based on build and more geared towards the 10 wr's on your roster


O, Maliks build owns yours and soon he'll be 4 aeq, you're jv compared to him
 
Dpride59
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ahrens858
considering it sums up the lol @ dpride in this thread ill post it as many times as i want.


What's the lol, Mayan made a thread thinking we were trying to win some horrible piece of MVP gear, and you explained over and over how little you know about this game. I mean when I said I was exploiting energy you thought that was some how against the rules, I mean - thanks for the laughs. For a kid who spends 20 hrs a day on this game you would think you would start to pick up on things a little quicker
 
ufshowboat
I has 7 titles
offline
Link
 
Damn. I guess Im going to have to revolutionize this thread and stick up for Dpride.

He is an asshole and a prick to everybody in the game. Sure.

But....


I tip my hat to you with what you have done with this team David. You thought outside the box, thought about what works/broken in the sim and pushed it to the max. And you followed the same rules as everybody else. And one of your teams did it without cheating this time.

Seriously. I really respect the thought and plan behind this. Revolutionary? Maybe. That's a big word, but you certainly deserve props for putting that team together with those tactics. Let's see if it works out in the end and you take it all the way.

One more thing..... Every single team WL champion has been ahead of the curve and thought a little outside the box, either with their dots or their gameplans. True Story.
 
Ahrens858
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dpride59
What's the lol, Mayan made a thread thinking we were trying to win some horrible piece of MVP gear, and you explained over and over how little you know about this game. I mean when I said I was exploiting energy you thought that was some how against the rules, I mean - thanks for the laughs. For a kid who spends 20 hrs a day on this game you would think you would start to pick up on things a little quicker


i never said it was against the rules. now stop making things up to try and save this thread from being a huge embarrassment to you.

Funny, for a kid who doesnt pick up on things quick i sure did blow this thread up in your face awfully quick.
 
TrevJo
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by NiborRis
Well, I see this is as the Texas Tech offense with better QB/WRs. So to consider what's broken, let's look at why they rack up 100-120 pts instead of 50-60.

I'm going to take a high-flying game from Tech's last season, vs Kansas State, which they won 66-14. Probably their highest offensive output of the season all around.
39/49 for 554 yards, 8 TDs, 1 INT
Also, they had 26 rushes for 185 yards.
That's 75 plays instead of 100. And they were 67% pass instead of 100% pass.
So at the 11.3 yards per pass play, if they'd thrown 100 pass plays up, but were sacked on 10 so they only got 90 passes off...that would be 1017 yards passing.

The numbers are NOT that far off from reality, on a per play basis, except that GLB has a huge play gap problem and in passing plays it's horribly magnified. And I'd recommend not touching that aspect unless XP gets a complete overhaul (it's been tweaked a bunch but could probably use a full makeover. Doubt we'll see that.)
And because of that, dots have to be in "better condition" than normal humans do just to get the same amount of tired at the end of the game.
And he did have 10 WRs to help keep his WRs fresh against opponents D.
And I bet his D was gassed and demoralized to all hell....just like the Tech D was for most of the Leach era.

It's not optimal, but honestly it's not as "sky is falling" as is being presented. Instead it's the result of being able to create unbalanced gameplans and totally sell out to a single strategy...which is completely unavoidable in this kind of game environment.

..I'd be more worried if he'd won 100-20 over a very good team, but putting up 100 in a loss seems to be exactly what his team is built to do.


It's not remotely similar to Texas Tech. As you alluded to, Tech HBs ran the ball almost 30% of the time last year for over 5 yards per carry. But where I disagree is with the notion that Arcade's offense is "not far off from [that] reality". 30% rushes is is certainly enough to make defenses honor the run, and that is a world of difference from 0%.

I don't care how many WRs you have, a team should not be able to throw every down, against a team expecting them to throw every down, and have overwhelming success with with it. Not unless the defensive talent is much less than the offensive talent, or unless the defensive tactics are just completely wrong.

Defending the results based in any way on energy and the 10WRs is really missing the point... Arcade scored TDs on their first 4 possessions, scored on every first half offensive possession (averaging 6 points per possession). They actually had more trouble in the second half. (As they should have, but the point is energy is not the reason they scored 100 points.)

While I like the idea of extreme tactics being used as a way to demonstrate the flaws in the game, here's are some likely problems I forsee happening:
-Dpride complains against a nerf to overpowered passing, and GLB admins are influenced by the huge amounts of cash he has spent.
-Dpride's QB wins the MVP award and then he complains about how it's not the best endorsement and gets it changed.
-Or, just as likely, GLB fails to fix the sim.
Edited by TrevJo on Sep 24, 2010 17:12:11
Edited by TrevJo on Sep 24, 2010 17:04:37
Edited by TrevJo on Sep 24, 2010 16:53:50
 
StinkCheese
offline
Link
 
inb4bortnerfsyou
 
Ahrens858
offline
Link
 
ahrens, your stupid for saying im exploiting the game.

im exploiting the game.

no im not

you said i cheat


jesus christ you are dumb.
 
StinkCheese
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Dpride59
I love Cheating


well we all already knew that
 
ufshowboat
I has 7 titles
offline
Link
 
The only thing embarrassing in this thread is the people with torches calling Jam Arcade cheaters. Maybe the Blaze guys are known for that and it makes it easy. But in is case, many of you should direct your anger to the game developer.
 
Ahrens858
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by ufshowboat
The only thing embarrassing in this thread is the people with torches calling Jam Arcade cheaters. Maybe the Blaze guys are known for that and it makes it easy. But in is case, many of you should direct your anger to the game developer.


i think you missed how this all started.

dpride claimed he was revolutionizing the game

which is completely off.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.