User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Europe East > Europe East AA Leagues > Eastern Europe Power Rankings AA#1
Page:
 
greg420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Devin00
and greg no offense to you or anyone else on ur team...but let's look at what the paper matchups show...


Jersey Krakow
overall 30 27
recieving 24 24
blocking 33 30
rush def 27 27
passing 33 30
rushing 24 27
pass def 24 24
kicking 39 33

so where does it show ur better? according to these we have you in 4 categories as you only have us in rushing....as you all didn't even beat a dominant team yet either...the only game worth noting is the one you tied...sry but i just don't see it...and i not trying to debate with your whole team...you have 1 player that is just a moron...i'm sure you know who i'm talking about.



im talkin individual position player by player, I have no idea where they get those numbers from.
 
jayhere5101
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Devin00
will someone else please step in and tell this dam toolbag that his 1 player playing on team is not undefeated...as it's getting quite old fast.


jayhere you have a 1-11 record between both of your teams...go do something to fix that please...as i would be excited to be on one winning team at least too so i don't blame you for jockin on about krakow.


Awwwwww...Need some help from more GLB MASTERS????

Here you go..this says it all...

Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS7nqwGt4-I
 
jayhere5101
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Devin00
Originally posted by jayhere5101

"undefeated- Never Defeated" When were we defeated??????? Answer the question! that's part of YOUR definition! When were we defeated??????


you have not been beaten but that's not the whole definition of the word...it's to be unbeaten and to always be victorious....you have not lost now answer my question....have you won every game? and fyi a tie is equivalent to a loss...as it is not a win either.


Okay...so you say we have NEVER BEEN BEATEN!!!!! In your world...does "beaten" and "defeated" mean the same thing??????? It does in my world...which makes the definition YOU sent...true! We are undefeated! NEVER BEEN BEATEN!
 
jayhere5101
offline
Link
 
LOL!!! This guy cracks me up......I should have known though..anyone with an avitar of Donald Trump...must be a douche bag...
Confirmed....

By the way...you can look at half of a definition you sent...but I can't??? Da Da Douche!!!
 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
k well here you go since u can't read it cuz u are ignorant

Undefeated means - never been beaten and always victorious

you are half of that....not all of it...thus not the right word to be using....

Unbeaten is another word....it's in the english dictionary...not the same words....this one is different from undefeated..

Unbeaten means - never been defeated....that's what you are....ding unbeaten

You are not undefeated because you have not been victorious in every game...

in your world they mean the same thing because you live in gray shaded area...it's beautiful once in a while to take a peek at the colors on the other side......moron.
 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by greg420
Originally posted by Devin00

and greg no offense to you or anyone else on ur team...but let's look at what the paper matchups show...


Jersey Krakow
overall 30 27
recieving 24 24
blocking 33 30
rush def 27 27
passing 33 30
rushing 24 27
pass def 24 24
kicking 39 33

so where does it show ur better? according to these we have you in 4 categories as you only have us in rushing....as you all didn't even beat a dominant team yet either...the only game worth noting is the one you tied...sry but i just don't see it...and i not trying to debate with your whole team...you have 1 player that is just a moron...i'm sure you know who i'm talking about.



im talkin individual position player by player, I have no idea where they get those numbers from.


yeah you might have a few higher lvl players but this is taken from overall team...a progress bar each player has telling their strength at their position...and overall we have a better team in a few spots...you have a better one at rb and fb by 3 overall....on paper you look higher lvl...on the field you better be able to play all them starters the entire game should we play...as your depth is half depleted or your guys are just not built good enough...whatever the case may be i don't know...i can't see...a team is not only compromised of it's starters...but of it's backups also...
 
jayhere5101
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Devin00
k well here you go since u can't read it cuz u are ignorant

Undefeated means - never been beaten and always victorious

you are half of that....not all of it...thus not the right word to be using....

Unbeaten is another word....it's in the english dictionary...not the same words....this one is different from undefeated..

Unbeaten means - never been defeated....that's what you are....ding unbeaten

You are not undefeated because you have not been victorious in every game...

in your world they mean the same thing because you live in gray shaded area...it's beautiful once in a while to take a peek at the colors on the other side......moron.


So...you will use half of a definition...the one that fits your argument...but not the half that fits mine??????? LOL!!! You are a bigger idiot then I gave you credit for!
 
greg420
offline
Link
 
this is what I meant when we were better on paper...

krakow jersey better player
qb - 13 qb - 13 push
hb - 13 rb - 10 krakow
fb - 12 fb - 10 krakow
Wr - 13 Wr - 13 push
Wr - 12 Wr - 12 push
OT - 13 OT - 12 krakow
OT - 13 OT - 12 krakow
OG - 13 OG - 12 krakow
OG - 13 OG - 12 krakow
C - 13 C - 12 krakow
DE - 12 DE - 12 push
DE - 12 DE - 11 krakow
NT - 12 NT - 12 push
DT - 12 DT - 10 krakow
OLB - 14 OLB - 12 krakow
MLB - 15 MLB - 13 krakow
OLB - 11 OLB - 11 push
CB - 13 CB - 14 jersey
CB - 11 CB - 14 jersey
FS - 13 FS - 13 push
SS - 13 SS - 12 krakow

K - 10 K - 10 push
P - 11 P - 9 krakow

Team Chem - 76 Team Chem - 71

Results...

krakow - 14
jersey - 2
push - 8

Owned
Last edited May 7, 2008 16:16:57
 
jayhere5101
offline
Link
 
BTW...your guards suck!! I am on another team that is losing..and my guard has 2x's the pan either of your player has! LOL!!!!!
 
jayhere5101
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by greg420
this is what I meant when we were better on paper...

krakow jersey better player results
qb - 13 qb - 13 push krakow - 14
hb - 13 rb - 10 krakow jersey - 2
fb - 12 fb - 10 krakow push - 8
Wr - 13 Wr - 13 push
Wr - 12 Wr - 12 push
OT - 13 OT - 12 krakow
OT - 13 OT - 12 krakow
OG - 13 OG - 12 krakow
OG - 13 OG - 12 krakow
C - 13 C - 12 krakow
DE - 12 DE - 12 push
DE - 12 DE - 11 krakow
NT - 12 NT - 12 push
DT - 12 DT - 10 krakow
OLB - 14 OLB - 12 krakow
MLB - 15 MLB - 13 krakow
OLB - 11 OLB - 11 push
CB - 13 CB - 14 jersey
CB - 11 CB - 14 jersey
FS - 13 FS - 13 push
SS - 13 SS - 12 krakow

K - 10 K - 10 push
P - 11 P - 9 krakow

Team Chem - 76 Team Chem - 71

Owned



Don't argue with this clown....his avitar is Donald Trump..that should tell you something! He is a clown!!!
 
greg420
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Devin00
Originally posted by greg420

Originally posted by Devin00


and greg no offense to you or anyone else on ur team...but let's look at what the paper matchups show...


Jersey Krakow
overall 30 27
recieving 24 24
blocking 33 30
rush def 27 27
passing 33 30
rushing 24 27
pass def 24 24
kicking 39 33

so where does it show ur better? according to these we have you in 4 categories as you only have us in rushing....as you all didn't even beat a dominant team yet either...the only game worth noting is the one you tied...sry but i just don't see it...and i not trying to debate with your whole team...you have 1 player that is just a moron...i'm sure you know who i'm talking about.



im talkin individual position player by player, I have no idea where they get those numbers from.


yeah you might have a few higher lvl players but this is taken from overall team...a progress bar each player has telling their strength at their position...and overall we have a better team in a few spots...you have a better one at rb and fb by 3 overall....on paper you look higher lvl...on the field you better be able to play all them starters the entire game should we play...as your depth is half depleted or your guys are just not built good enough...whatever the case may be i don't know...i can't see...a team is not only compromised of it's starters...but of it's backups also...


lol... have you seen our depth? shall I do a comparison of that too, or should I spare you the embarresment of your team again?

The only reason our stats arent higher is cause everyone on our team is gettin playing time, not just the best players, and were still beating some of the best teams in our division.

Play someone good first before you start proclaiming yourself the best.
 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jayhere5101
Originally posted by Devin00

k well here you go since u can't read it cuz u are ignorant

Undefeated means - never been beaten and always victorious

you are half of that....not all of it...thus not the right word to be using....

Unbeaten is another word....it's in the english dictionary...not the same words....this one is different from undefeated..

Unbeaten means - never been defeated....that's what you are....ding unbeaten

You are not undefeated because you have not been victorious in every game...

in your world they mean the same thing because you live in gray shaded area...it's beautiful once in a while to take a peek at the colors on the other side......moron.


So...you will use half of a definition...the one that fits your argument...but not the half that fits mine??????? LOL!!! You are a bigger idiot then I gave you credit for!


it is not siding with half a definition of a word....do be determined undefeated you have to live up to the whole meaning of the word which u guys do not...
 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by greg420
Originally posted by Devin00

Originally posted by greg420


Originally posted by Devin00



and greg no offense to you or anyone else on ur team...but let's look at what the paper matchups show...


Jersey Krakow
overall 30 27
recieving 24 24
blocking 33 30
rush def 27 27
passing 33 30
rushing 24 27
pass def 24 24
kicking 39 33

so where does it show ur better? according to these we have you in 4 categories as you only have us in rushing....as you all didn't even beat a dominant team yet either...the only game worth noting is the one you tied...sry but i just don't see it...and i not trying to debate with your whole team...you have 1 player that is just a moron...i'm sure you know who i'm talking about.



im talkin individual position player by player, I have no idea where they get those numbers from.


yeah you might have a few higher lvl players but this is taken from overall team...a progress bar each player has telling their strength at their position...and overall we have a better team in a few spots...you have a better one at rb and fb by 3 overall....on paper you look higher lvl...on the field you better be able to play all them starters the entire game should we play...as your depth is half depleted or your guys are just not built good enough...whatever the case may be i don't know...i can't see...a team is not only compromised of it's starters...but of it's backups also...


lol... have you seen our depth? shall I do a comparison of that too, or should I spare you the embarresment of your team again?

The only reason our stats arent higher is cause everyone on our team is gettin playing time, not just the best players, and were still beating some of the best teams in our division.

Play someone good first before you start proclaiming yourself the best.


ur one backup at each position is not depth...and you are not embarrasing nothing....what do the records say...that's enough explanation...when we lose come talk to me...who have you guys played and beat? noone....so the saying fits the both...
 
Devin00
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jayhere5101
BTW...your guards suck!! I am on another team that is losing..and my guard has 2x's the pan either of your player has! LOL!!!!!


our guards suk....lmao i'm done commenting here for now...i just can't believe how simple someone can be....have you looked at any of your own players....

may i repeat or you can scroll up...

15 career receptions in 12 career games....man you are dominating...hope we don't see you on the field...lmao get a life.
 
jayhere5101
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Devin00
Originally posted by jayhere5101

Originally posted by Devin00


k well here you go since u can't read it cuz u are ignorant

Undefeated means - never been beaten and always victorious

you are half of that....not all of it...thus not the right word to be using....

Unbeaten is another word....it's in the english dictionary...not the same words....this one is different from undefeated..

Unbeaten means - never been defeated....that's what you are....ding unbeaten

You are not undefeated because you have not been victorious in every game...

in your world they mean the same thing because you live in gray shaded area...it's beautiful once in a while to take a peek at the colors on the other side......moron.


So...you will use half of a definition...the one that fits your argument...but not the half that fits mine??????? LOL!!! You are a bigger idiot then I gave you credit for!


it is not siding with half a definition of a word....do be determined undefeated you have to live up to the whole meaning of the word which u guys do not...


So...its okay to use half of the definition..as long as it fits your argument. But we are to forget about the other half....hmmmm...wow..you truly are the GLB MASTER!!!!!!! Go back to school you fool!
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.