Seems weird to have the ladder games scheduled while the #1 team's league game still hasn't completed.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Real Ladder Talk: The Top 25 (updated July 12th)
Originally posted by NiborRis
Seems weird to have the ladder games scheduled while the #1 team's league game still hasn't completed.
:/
Seems weird to have the ladder games scheduled while the #1 team's league game still hasn't completed.
:/
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
GG Generals, we had a rough start to the season, nice to know that we are back on track.
Edited by USC_Trojans on Aug 11, 2014 11:12:11
Something cool about this replay with the jumping defender: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/92205/2590451
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Something cool about this replay with the jumping defender: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/92205/2590451
I wonder if you can even possibly get enough vertical to get those jump tries to consistently work. If you run zone defenses, you see a half dozen plays like that in one game sometimes.
Something cool about this replay with the jumping defender: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/92205/2590451
I wonder if you can even possibly get enough vertical to get those jump tries to consistently work. If you run zone defenses, you see a half dozen plays like that in one game sometimes.
Originally posted by Galithor
I wonder if you can even possibly get enough vertical to get those jump tries to consistently work. If you run zone defenses, you see a half dozen plays like that in one game sometimes.
It'd be interesting if there was a differentiating display for deflect and INT attempts. Maybe a lot of those jumping attempts are INTs attempts and we just need moar intercepting, lol.
I wonder if you can even possibly get enough vertical to get those jump tries to consistently work. If you run zone defenses, you see a half dozen plays like that in one game sometimes.
It'd be interesting if there was a differentiating display for deflect and INT attempts. Maybe a lot of those jumping attempts are INTs attempts and we just need moar intercepting, lol.
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
It'd be interesting if there was a differentiating display for deflect and INT attempts. Maybe a lot of those jumping attempts are INTs attempts and we just need moar intercepting, lol.
maybe. Though when I'm seeing guys with 50-60 interception getting the same 0-2 picks a season as guys with 10 interception, I can understand folks general lack of enthusiasm for going out and building guys with 80+ interception.
It'd be interesting if there was a differentiating display for deflect and INT attempts. Maybe a lot of those jumping attempts are INTs attempts and we just need moar intercepting, lol.
maybe. Though when I'm seeing guys with 50-60 interception getting the same 0-2 picks a season as guys with 10 interception, I can understand folks general lack of enthusiasm for going out and building guys with 80+ interception.
Edited by Galithor on Aug 11, 2014 15:53:43
Galithor
offline
offline
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/43048
Is this build the best Interception guy this season? If that's the model for a 10 INT type guy, then I do wonder what such a build would look like if he gets to 70 INT, and has eyes on the prize instead of on an Island and the team runs a bunch of zones.
Otherwise, there's just something magical about 90/90/75 awareness/cov tech/footwork, with 50s in INT/conditioning/sprinting/quickness and another 80 points in deflection?
Is 75ish footwork pretty common in pro? Maybe that's why he stands out. Dude's just backpedaling a little bit further than most CBs before turning, and it's buying him more jumped pass opportunities on a bigger variety of routes.
Lord knows his sprinting and quickness ought to have him eaten alive by the 90+ sprinting type WRs.
Is this build the best Interception guy this season? If that's the model for a 10 INT type guy, then I do wonder what such a build would look like if he gets to 70 INT, and has eyes on the prize instead of on an Island and the team runs a bunch of zones.
Otherwise, there's just something magical about 90/90/75 awareness/cov tech/footwork, with 50s in INT/conditioning/sprinting/quickness and another 80 points in deflection?
Is 75ish footwork pretty common in pro? Maybe that's why he stands out. Dude's just backpedaling a little bit further than most CBs before turning, and it's buying him more jumped pass opportunities on a bigger variety of routes.
Lord knows his sprinting and quickness ought to have him eaten alive by the 90+ sprinting type WRs.
Edited by Galithor on Aug 11, 2014 16:29:58
Time Trial
offline
offline
Zone awareness would be required.
I believe that you can't ignore deflection skills to get INTs. Many of the INTs that I see come from builds that aren't just getting into position for the INT, but builds who tip the ball with the PD roll and then catch it.
I believe that you can't ignore deflection skills to get INTs. Many of the INTs that I see come from builds that aren't just getting into position for the INT, but builds who tip the ball with the PD roll and then catch it.
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by Time Trial
Zone awareness would be required.
I believe that you can't ignore deflection skills to get INTs. Many of the INTs that I see come from builds that aren't just getting into position for the INT, but builds who tip the ball with the PD roll and then catch it.
If it works that you need to win a deflect roll to get an INT roll, that'd make man coverage with OaI superior to zone with eyes on the prize for interceptions. Eyes could give +50 interception, and it'd still be inferior.
Zone awareness would be required.
I believe that you can't ignore deflection skills to get INTs. Many of the INTs that I see come from builds that aren't just getting into position for the INT, but builds who tip the ball with the PD roll and then catch it.
If it works that you need to win a deflect roll to get an INT roll, that'd make man coverage with OaI superior to zone with eyes on the prize for interceptions. Eyes could give +50 interception, and it'd still be inferior.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
If it works that you need to win a deflect roll to get an INT roll, that'd make man coverage with OaI superior to zone with eyes on the prize for interceptions. Eyes could give +50 interception, and it'd still be inferior.
I don't think you always have to, I just seem to see most of the INTs coming from what appear to be a failed catch or a tip.
If it works that you need to win a deflect roll to get an INT roll, that'd make man coverage with OaI superior to zone with eyes on the prize for interceptions. Eyes could give +50 interception, and it'd still be inferior.
I don't think you always have to, I just seem to see most of the INTs coming from what appear to be a failed catch or a tip.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
