Warrior General Games

I am ready for a team.. your new approach seems to be the most fair.... Keep up the improvements!

now we just need the list to get implemented to discover how many people gonna top us on the list

Unfortunately some of us will never get the chance to own a team because of when we joined. I joined at the begging of the second season and with all of the accounts I think it will be slim chance that I will see a team.Think of all of the season one accounts that got aced out for one reason or another.
I just hope that there will be no collusion between the present teams and the future ones.......

Still a great idea though

I think that any owner who wants to sell back the team the Gm(s) automatically get first chance to buy it if they differ from the owner. It only seems fair to keep teh team going forward. After all, who can best fix things than the current people? Shy of that, then random owners based on creation date seems the most fair.

I think increasing the purchasing price a "little bit" is a bad idea, the only thing it will help increase is revenue not responsible ownership.. What is a little bit, 200 flex points? Paying $2 more isn't going to make someone be a responsible owner, or what about making it 1500? Then you have people paying 100 more for the first two seasons than what people before paid for three seasons and for more than one team in some cases. There are enough complaints about the perks of having been here since the start as it is.

If the initial price goes up, it wont be long before the extension does also, if not at the same time. If offseasons are 3-5 days an owner who bought a team at the start of the season will have spent 3000 flex if they still own the team Super Bowl weekend.

Originally posted by TroyAikman8
Unfortunately some of us will never get the chance to own a team because of when we joined. I joined at the begging of the second season and with all of the accounts I think it will be slim chance that I will see a team.Think of all of the season one accounts that got aced out for one reason or another.
I just hope that there will be no collusion between the present teams and the future ones.......

Still a great idea though

You can still get one before the list goes into affect though..


Creation date is only going to apply to the past 30 days also I guess..

Originally posted by Bort
- The list is ordered by account creation date, up to 30 days back. If two accounts are at least 30 days old, it's ordered by the day you add yourself to the list.

Originally posted by refguru
I think that any owner who wants to sell back the team the Gm(s) automatically get first chance to buy it if they differ from the owner. It only seems fair to keep teh team going forward. After all, who can best fix things than the current people? Shy of that, then random owners based on creation date seems the most fair.

Bort already replied that will tend to encourage black market

Originally posted by manic


You can still get one before the list goes into affect though..



Theorically ... but there are really few chances that gonna happen

edit - nevermind

Originally posted by neverdodge
Originally posted by manic



You can still get one before the list goes into affect though..



Theorically ... but there are really few chances that gonna happen



Depends on where/how you look.. the right search options and firefox can make the odds pretty good

Originally posted by Bort

- The list is ordered by account creation date, up to 30 days back. If two accounts are at least 30 days old, it's ordered by the day you add yourself to the list.


Why distinguish between people who were here 31 days ago and people that were here 29 days ago?

Why dont you just say anyone who has the Alpha tester logo on their profile gets a free team.

Seems pretty hypocritical to favour your older players, but only up to some point.

Is that going to be 30 days from end of season 2 or 30 days from when the list is made?

Originally posted by Dee
Originally posted by Bort


- The list is ordered by account creation date, up to 30 days back. If two accounts are at least 30 days old, it's ordered by the day you add yourself to the list.


Why distinguish between people who were here 31 days ago and people that were here 29 days ago?

Why dont you just say anyone who has the Alpha tester logo on their profile gets a free team.

Seems pretty hypocritical to favour your older players, but only up to some point.



I totally agree. I haven't been here but 6 days and I feel I have more responsibility than atleast half of people spamming for teams and such.

I don't get how older players can be favored more than newer players? We are all for here for one reason, and most of us spend money on here.. so we should all have a fair chance of getting a team. I don't believe i could count the many teams ive check the buy team forum and refreshed continuously.

I think there should be a set date when the Buy Team sign up would be added. It would give everyone a fair chance to be here and sign up, but only if you have the 500fp to get started.

Originally posted by Dee
Originally posted by Bort


- The list is ordered by account creation date, up to 30 days back. If two accounts are at least 30 days old, it's ordered by the day you add yourself to the list.


Why distinguish between people who were here 31 days ago and people that were here 29 days ago?

Why dont you just say anyone who has the Alpha tester logo on their profile gets a free team.

Seems pretty hypocritical to favour your older players, but only up to some point.



You have that backwards.. If you have been here for since season 1 your spot on the list depends on when you get on the list.

is fair in 1 sense dat an older member can have a better chance of gettin a team cus if a newer player just came along everybody wud b sookin cus he got a team
any1 with a team already shudnt b allowed get another!!!!!!!!!!!!