Well played Danish, unlucky with the result though. Glad we finally got rid of the losing streak against you 
Semineer
offline
offline
Originally posted by Crowlnole
Great game Melbourne! I may be biased, but I think we played an instant classic tonight. See you guys in the playoffs, and good luck the rest of the way.
Well I don't like to be on the L side of games, but that was a great game! Good luck to you guys as well!
Great game Melbourne! I may be biased, but I think we played an instant classic tonight. See you guys in the playoffs, and good luck the rest of the way.
Well I don't like to be on the L side of games, but that was a great game! Good luck to you guys as well!
justin5745
offline
offline
jeeeeez!
3rd quarter....
14:51 Orlando TD C Ward pass to Chips Ahoy over the middle, PAT made by Shank Johnson [TD] (60 yd gain)
11:40 Orlando TD C Ward pass to Boom Dizzle up the right side, PAT made by Shank Johnson [TD] (55 yd gain)
7:58 Orlando TD DeAndre Love pass to Jock Longthrow up the right side[forced fumble: Sharif Campbell], fumbled , recovered by Rocky The Balboa, PAT made by Shank Johnson [TD] (88 yd return)
i dont think you could have gotten a worse string of events to happen... lol. we blew up. dont get me wrong tho, im not trying to take anything away, obviously you made those things happen. good game, hopefully we get a rematch. (nice goal line stand at the end too.)
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
3rd quarter....
14:51 Orlando TD C Ward pass to Chips Ahoy over the middle, PAT made by Shank Johnson [TD] (60 yd gain)
11:40 Orlando TD C Ward pass to Boom Dizzle up the right side, PAT made by Shank Johnson [TD] (55 yd gain)
7:58 Orlando TD DeAndre Love pass to Jock Longthrow up the right side[forced fumble: Sharif Campbell], fumbled , recovered by Rocky The Balboa, PAT made by Shank Johnson [TD] (88 yd return)
i dont think you could have gotten a worse string of events to happen... lol. we blew up. dont get me wrong tho, im not trying to take anything away, obviously you made those things happen. good game, hopefully we get a rematch. (nice goal line stand at the end too.)
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Last edited Jul 2, 2008 20:29:51
Chetro
offline
offline
Originally posted by justin5745
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Yeah, but I'm confused as to why we're in that order... Orlando lost to both Perth and Danish, but are ranked ahead of them. Shouldn't it be Northbrook, Melbourne, Danish (lost to Melbourne), Perth (lost to Danish), then Orlando?
Although Orlando just beat Melbourne, so I guess that complicates things.
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Yeah, but I'm confused as to why we're in that order... Orlando lost to both Perth and Danish, but are ranked ahead of them. Shouldn't it be Northbrook, Melbourne, Danish (lost to Melbourne), Perth (lost to Danish), then Orlando?
Although Orlando just beat Melbourne, so I guess that complicates things.
Crowlnole
offline
offline
It was the first thing I said to my GM. Sometimes it's better to be lucky than good.
justin5745
offline
offline
Originally posted by Chetro
Originally posted by justin5745
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Yeah, but I'm confused as to why we're in that order... Orlando lost to both Perth and Danish, but are ranked ahead of them. Shouldn't it be Northbrook, Melbourne, Danish (lost to Melbourne), Perth (lost to Danish), then Orlando?
Although Orlando just beat Melbourne, so I guess that complicates things.
yea seriously.... talk about confusing, who wants to do that thing i saw last year that shows who can lock up what spot? haha j/k
Originally posted by justin5745
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Yeah, but I'm confused as to why we're in that order... Orlando lost to both Perth and Danish, but are ranked ahead of them. Shouldn't it be Northbrook, Melbourne, Danish (lost to Melbourne), Perth (lost to Danish), then Orlando?
Although Orlando just beat Melbourne, so I guess that complicates things.
yea seriously.... talk about confusing, who wants to do that thing i saw last year that shows who can lock up what spot? haha j/k
Crowlnole
offline
offline
Originally posted by Chetro
Originally posted by justin5745
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Yeah, but I'm confused as to why we're in that order... Orlando lost to both Perth and Danish, but are ranked ahead of them. Shouldn't it be Northbrook, Melbourne, Danish (lost to Melbourne), Perth (lost to Danish), then Orlando?
Although Orlando just beat Melbourne, so I guess that complicates things.
Orlando lost to Perth and Northbrook. We have yet to play Danish.
Maybe the SIM knows half of Orlando hasn't boosted yet.
Originally posted by justin5745
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Yeah, but I'm confused as to why we're in that order... Orlando lost to both Perth and Danish, but are ranked ahead of them. Shouldn't it be Northbrook, Melbourne, Danish (lost to Melbourne), Perth (lost to Danish), then Orlando?
Although Orlando just beat Melbourne, so I guess that complicates things.
Orlando lost to Perth and Northbrook. We have yet to play Danish.
Maybe the SIM knows half of Orlando hasn't boosted yet.
Last edited Jul 2, 2008 21:16:19
MrMoose
offline
offline
When you have teams with similar records grouped and one team hasn't beat all of the others, it goes to points total.
vexxet
offline
offline
Originally posted by General Terms
Originally posted by Masakari
Originally posted by General Terms
Still no talk about the Devils...
What kind of talk you lookin' for?
I honestly dont know. I am not accustomed to rockin it stealth style. the first team i gmd is the talk of its league. i suppose sneaking up the rankings aint all bad.
hows this for talk. This will be the rubber match between LVSB and Tasmania. Winner takes the series.
Originally posted by Masakari
Originally posted by General Terms
Still no talk about the Devils...
What kind of talk you lookin' for?
I honestly dont know. I am not accustomed to rockin it stealth style. the first team i gmd is the talk of its league. i suppose sneaking up the rankings aint all bad.
hows this for talk. This will be the rubber match between LVSB and Tasmania. Winner takes the series.
Chetro
offline
offline
Originally posted by Crowlnole
Originally posted by Chetro
Originally posted by justin5745
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Yeah, but I'm confused as to why we're in that order... Orlando lost to both Perth and Danish, but are ranked ahead of them. Shouldn't it be Northbrook, Melbourne, Danish (lost to Melbourne), Perth (lost to Danish), then Orlando?
Although Orlando just beat Melbourne, so I guess that complicates things.
Orlando lost to Perth and Northbrook. We have yet to play Danish.
Maybe the SIM knows half of Orlando hasn't boosted yet.
Maybe... but the SIM doesn't know that NONE of Perth has boosted yet and we get a bonus 5 boosts.
Originally posted by Chetro
Originally posted by justin5745
i also like how positions 2-5 are all tied up. makes things pretty interesting
Yeah, but I'm confused as to why we're in that order... Orlando lost to both Perth and Danish, but are ranked ahead of them. Shouldn't it be Northbrook, Melbourne, Danish (lost to Melbourne), Perth (lost to Danish), then Orlando?
Although Orlando just beat Melbourne, so I guess that complicates things.
Orlando lost to Perth and Northbrook. We have yet to play Danish.
Maybe the SIM knows half of Orlando hasn't boosted yet.
Maybe... but the SIM doesn't know that NONE of Perth has boosted yet and we get a bonus 5 boosts.
Crowlnole
offline
offline
It could end up a total mess. Orlando and Danish have yet to play. Perth and Melbourne still square off too. Northbrook should roll until they run into LVSB to endthe season.
shaffe
offline
offline
Originally posted by vexxet
hows this for talk. This will be the rubber match between LVSB and Tasmania. Winner takes the series.
rubber match? when have we ever come within 50 points of you guys?
or are you just confident in your ability to win that you would gamble the reputation of two previous ass kickings on it?
i look forward to testing our mettle against the top again, a chance we haven't had in a while (our disappointing performance against portland notwithstanding).
hows this for talk. This will be the rubber match between LVSB and Tasmania. Winner takes the series.
rubber match? when have we ever come within 50 points of you guys?
or are you just confident in your ability to win that you would gamble the reputation of two previous ass kickings on it?
i look forward to testing our mettle against the top again, a chance we haven't had in a while (our disappointing performance against portland notwithstanding).
travathian
offline
offline
Originally posted by Semineer
Wow @ Darwin! I don't think I've seen a team put that many points up yet.
A few less drops from our WRs and it could have been an even 200-0. Of course now we are paying for it as a bunch of our team is tired from running up and down the field all day.
Wow @ Darwin! I don't think I've seen a team put that many points up yet.
A few less drops from our WRs and it could have been an even 200-0. Of course now we are paying for it as a bunch of our team is tired from running up and down the field all day.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
