All bets on player to score first touchdown
$2475 on Any other Drygerian player (15/1)
$2475 on Any other Honolulu player (15/1)
$11,550 on Garrett Dooley (2/1)
$6599 on Jericho Brooks (6/1)
Forum > Pro Leagues > World League Playoff Bookie
sckbleh
offline
offline
All bets on player to score first touchdown
$2475 on Any other Drygerian player (15/1)
$2475 on Any other Honolulu player (15/1)
$11,550 on Garrett Dooley (2/1)
$6599 on Jericho Brooks (6/1)
Abstract Actuary
offline
offline
These are all the bets I have for this final round. Double check that I didn't miss yours.
Originally posted by Stobie
14,200 on -110 Under 52.5 points scored
14,200 on -110 Drygerian Hoblosionnaires imo -9.5
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Actually, to make it more interesting I'd like to switch it to:
$5,000 on +200 Honolulu Hurricane Warriors -5.5
$2,000 on +300 Honolulu Hurricane Warriors -17.5
$900 15/1 Any other HHW player
$900 15/1 Any other Drygerian player
Originally posted by kurieg
$13,800 on -110 under 52.5 points scored
Max bet for you is 10,500, so I went with that.
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
$1500 15/1 Any other Honolulu player
$3000 6/1 Jericho Brooks
$2000 6/1 Kenton Addai
$6000 -110 Over 52.5 points scored
Originally posted by boomer82
$5000 on Jericho Brooks scoring the first TD
$2100 on any other Drygerian player
$2100 on any other HHW player
Originally posted by Veracocha
$2000 on any other Drygerian
$2000 on any other HHW
$4000 on -110 Under 52.5 points scored
$4000 on -110 Honolulu Hurricane Warriors +9.5
Originally posted by sckbleh
All bets on player to score first touchdown
$2475 on Any other Drygerian player (15/1)
$2475 on Any other Honolulu player (15/1)
$11,550 on Garrett Dooley (2/1)
$6599 on Jericho Brooks (6/1)
I'm rounding these to hundreds for you as follows: 2,500 ; 2,500 ; 11,500 ; 6,600
Originally posted by Stobie
14,200 on -110 Under 52.5 points scored
14,200 on -110 Drygerian Hoblosionnaires imo -9.5
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Actually, to make it more interesting I'd like to switch it to:
$5,000 on +200 Honolulu Hurricane Warriors -5.5
$2,000 on +300 Honolulu Hurricane Warriors -17.5
$900 15/1 Any other HHW player
$900 15/1 Any other Drygerian player
Originally posted by kurieg
$13,800 on -110 under 52.5 points scored
Max bet for you is 10,500, so I went with that.
Originally posted by PLAYMAKERS
$1500 15/1 Any other Honolulu player
$3000 6/1 Jericho Brooks
$2000 6/1 Kenton Addai
$6000 -110 Over 52.5 points scored
Originally posted by boomer82
$5000 on Jericho Brooks scoring the first TD
$2100 on any other Drygerian player
$2100 on any other HHW player
Originally posted by Veracocha
$2000 on any other Drygerian
$2000 on any other HHW
$4000 on -110 Under 52.5 points scored
$4000 on -110 Honolulu Hurricane Warriors +9.5
Originally posted by sckbleh
All bets on player to score first touchdown
$2475 on Any other Drygerian player (15/1)
$2475 on Any other Honolulu player (15/1)
$11,550 on Garrett Dooley (2/1)
$6599 on Jericho Brooks (6/1)
I'm rounding these to hundreds for you as follows: 2,500 ; 2,500 ; 11,500 ; 6,600
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by sckbleh
All bets on player to score first touchdown
$2475 on Any other Drygerian player (15/1)
$2475 on Any other Honolulu player (15/1)
$11,550 on Garrett Dooley (2/1)
$6599 on Jericho Brooks (6/1)
You might want to round your numbers to multiples of 100's, otherwise I think all of your bets are going to be D'Qd. According to the rules all bets have to be in multiples of 100s, therefore your post here doesn't include any bets. Although if you aren't betting perhaps you could win by standing pat, so you have that chance if you don't see this message in time.
All bets on player to score first touchdown
$2475 on Any other Drygerian player (15/1)
$2475 on Any other Honolulu player (15/1)
$11,550 on Garrett Dooley (2/1)
$6599 on Jericho Brooks (6/1)
You might want to round your numbers to multiples of 100's, otherwise I think all of your bets are going to be D'Qd. According to the rules all bets have to be in multiples of 100s, therefore your post here doesn't include any bets. Although if you aren't betting perhaps you could win by standing pat, so you have that chance if you don't see this message in time.
Abstract Actuary
offline
offline
Updated balances. Double check, please.
Current Balance - Player - Available Balance
$28,400 Stobie $-
$23,100 sckbleh $-
$22,600 ki11erkiwi $22,600
$22,000 Ctap $22,000
$21,000 kurieg $3,300
$20,300 Veracocha $8,300
$19,200 xcoach2 $19,200
$18,600 PLAYMAKERS $-
$16,700 Dirty Mo Posse $14,200
$13,800 cbothe $11,300
$13,800 The Strategy Expert $-
$12,100 joemiken $9,600
$10,300 mlbtrader23 $10,300
$9,600 sirallan $9,600
$9,600 tautology $9,600
$9,600 letan24 $9,600
$9,600 jdros13 $9,600
$9,200 Kingdan23 $6,100
$9,200 boomer82 $-
$7,300 The Duff Man $7,300
$7,300 coachviking $7,300
$7,300 qjam6 $4,800
$7,300 Willis66 $4,800
$7,200 MontyK $7,200
$6,900 Hoates $5,900
$5,100 Voltron $5,100
$4,800 Gart888 $4,800
$2,500 Timetoshine-Beta $-
$2,300 phthalatemagic $-
$- PatricktheDookie $-
Current Balance - Player - Available Balance
$28,400 Stobie $-
$23,100 sckbleh $-
$22,600 ki11erkiwi $22,600
$22,000 Ctap $22,000
$21,000 kurieg $3,300
$20,300 Veracocha $8,300
$19,200 xcoach2 $19,200
$18,600 PLAYMAKERS $-
$16,700 Dirty Mo Posse $14,200
$13,800 cbothe $11,300
$13,800 The Strategy Expert $-
$12,100 joemiken $9,600
$10,300 mlbtrader23 $10,300
$9,600 sirallan $9,600
$9,600 tautology $9,600
$9,600 letan24 $9,600
$9,600 jdros13 $9,600
$9,200 Kingdan23 $6,100
$9,200 boomer82 $-
$7,300 The Duff Man $7,300
$7,300 coachviking $7,300
$7,300 qjam6 $4,800
$7,300 Willis66 $4,800
$7,200 MontyK $7,200
$6,900 Hoates $5,900
$5,100 Voltron $5,100
$4,800 Gart888 $4,800
$2,500 Timetoshine-Beta $-
$2,300 phthalatemagic $-
$- PatricktheDookie $-
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Wow we posted at the same time LOL. But how can you adjust somebody's bets, shouldn't the onus be on the player to list their bets? Cause now he can play it both ways, if his bets dont come in he can claim he didnt make any bets and wants to stand pat as a backup plan.
Edited by The Strategy Expert on Sep 23, 2009 16:30:52
Abstract Actuary
offline
offline
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Wow we posted at the same time LOL. But how can you adjust somebody's bets, shouldn't the onus be on the player to list their bets?
I've been lenient in the past, as well. Regarding editing, etc. Also, I usually point out illegal bets with more time to spare.
Wow we posted at the same time LOL. But how can you adjust somebody's bets, shouldn't the onus be on the player to list their bets?
I've been lenient in the past, as well. Regarding editing, etc. Also, I usually point out illegal bets with more time to spare.
Abstract Actuary
offline
offline
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Wow we posted at the same time LOL. But how can you adjust somebody's bets, shouldn't the onus be on the player to list their bets? Cause now he can play it both ways, if his bets dont come in he can claim he didnt make any bets and wants to stand pat as a backup plan.
If he tries to play it that way (1) he won't be eligible for the grand prize (flex) and (2) we will all laugh at him, since we know that wasn't his intent.
Wow we posted at the same time LOL. But how can you adjust somebody's bets, shouldn't the onus be on the player to list their bets? Cause now he can play it both ways, if his bets dont come in he can claim he didnt make any bets and wants to stand pat as a backup plan.
If he tries to play it that way (1) he won't be eligible for the grand prize (flex) and (2) we will all laugh at him, since we know that wasn't his intent.
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Originally posted by Abstract Actuary
If he tries to play it that way (1) he won't be eligible for the grand prize (flex) and (2) we will all laugh at him, since we know that wasn't his intent.
Well it seems like it could be his intent because why would he take 25 dollars off a couple of them and put them on another to be goofy? Seems to me like he is trying to stand pat, with a chance of getting credited for a win if you allow him to do so in his post. It doesn't seem to me like his bets are illegal, I would say that they aren't bets, a bet isn't a bet until it is accepted as a bet, and I don't see how you can accept them as bets since the definition of bets was spelled out in the master rules in the OP?
If he tries to play it that way (1) he won't be eligible for the grand prize (flex) and (2) we will all laugh at him, since we know that wasn't his intent.
Well it seems like it could be his intent because why would he take 25 dollars off a couple of them and put them on another to be goofy? Seems to me like he is trying to stand pat, with a chance of getting credited for a win if you allow him to do so in his post. It doesn't seem to me like his bets are illegal, I would say that they aren't bets, a bet isn't a bet until it is accepted as a bet, and I don't see how you can accept them as bets since the definition of bets was spelled out in the master rules in the OP?
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
Honestly the biggest flaw of the bets were the ANY OTHER player bets. If you look at the total number of TDs of all players included, some of offense as well as defense, the odds of 15/1 were favorably high, they should have been reduced. I would have put all my money on those 2 options evenly if I could, but I was already committed to HHW when I took the 5/2 odds on the championship win in the previous round. Also the QB to score first was too low it should have been a lot more than 15/1.
The Strategy Expert
offline
offline
sckbleh shouldn't get 3rd place based upon his nonbets imo.
Edited by The Strategy Expert on Sep 23, 2009 16:52:30
Edited by The Strategy Expert on Sep 23, 2009 16:51:13
Abstract Actuary
offline
offline
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Honestly the biggest flaw of the bets were the ANY OTHER player bets. If you look at the total number of TDs of all players included, some of offense as well as defense, the odds of 15/1 were favorably high, they should have been reduced. I would have put all my money on those 2 options evenly if I could, but I was already committed to HHW when I took the 5/2 odds on the championship win in the previous round. Also the QB to score first was too low it should have been a lot more than 15/1.
I agree that it turned out the 'Any Other' bets were pretty high. I thought that the odds that a RB or top WR would score the touchdown were pretty high. Then considering that I split the 'Any other player' line up by team, that further reduced the odds. By taking both, you basically had to take about 7.5/1 on 'any other player'. Eh, I still feel it was the right line, with the large percentage of TDs scored by the RBs. It ended up burning me, obviously, but that is how it works.
Yes, the QB odds were high, but you could basically just throw that line out.
Honestly the biggest flaw of the bets were the ANY OTHER player bets. If you look at the total number of TDs of all players included, some of offense as well as defense, the odds of 15/1 were favorably high, they should have been reduced. I would have put all my money on those 2 options evenly if I could, but I was already committed to HHW when I took the 5/2 odds on the championship win in the previous round. Also the QB to score first was too low it should have been a lot more than 15/1.
I agree that it turned out the 'Any Other' bets were pretty high. I thought that the odds that a RB or top WR would score the touchdown were pretty high. Then considering that I split the 'Any other player' line up by team, that further reduced the odds. By taking both, you basically had to take about 7.5/1 on 'any other player'. Eh, I still feel it was the right line, with the large percentage of TDs scored by the RBs. It ended up burning me, obviously, but that is how it works.
Yes, the QB odds were high, but you could basically just throw that line out.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
