Originally posted by Corndog
If normal passing was 60% games would be 120 to 106 and fewer people would be talking about hurries.
Not necessarily if you get there by somehow strengthening short passes at the expense of deeper passes.
Plays like this:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/102684/450292?player_id=35494
Are why most folks just don't bother with short passing. I'd happily dink and dunk my way down the field at a slower pace if it were able to be remotely efficient. If I'm gonna pass for 50-60% though regardless of the depth of the target, I might as well do it trying for 15 yard gains instead of 5 yard gains.
As it is, the only time I do short passing plays is in my short yardage packages. I'm probably wasting my time with them, since I could just do another TE Post, WR Posts, Double Cross, etc and get more yards and a better YPA.
If normal passing was 60% games would be 120 to 106 and fewer people would be talking about hurries.
Not necessarily if you get there by somehow strengthening short passes at the expense of deeper passes.
Plays like this:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/102684/450292?player_id=35494
Are why most folks just don't bother with short passing. I'd happily dink and dunk my way down the field at a slower pace if it were able to be remotely efficient. If I'm gonna pass for 50-60% though regardless of the depth of the target, I might as well do it trying for 15 yard gains instead of 5 yard gains.
As it is, the only time I do short passing plays is in my short yardage packages. I'm probably wasting my time with them, since I could just do another TE Post, WR Posts, Double Cross, etc and get more yards and a better YPA.
Edited by Galithor on Sep 3, 2014 10:36:59






























