GG Maine
PING72
offline
offline
Originally posted by LordEvil
I wouldn't mind that much how bad passing to Wrs suck, but the cost is what bothers me. You have to have at least 6 and at 300 a piece times 900 a piece for boosting thats 7,200 plus 600 for custom, 7,800 flex for not even half assed players. So 50 dollars per team to have a shitty passing game is just ridiculous. I guess GLB is looking out for their own interest,
If all they do is block, let's get some OT's or TE's in there.
I wouldn't mind that much how bad passing to Wrs suck, but the cost is what bothers me. You have to have at least 6 and at 300 a piece times 900 a piece for boosting thats 7,200 plus 600 for custom, 7,800 flex for not even half assed players. So 50 dollars per team to have a shitty passing game is just ridiculous. I guess GLB is looking out for their own interest,
If all they do is block, let's get some OT's or TE's in there.
PING72
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lone Star Mercs
GG Ping - You've got your shit together this season!
GG. Your defense is tough!
GG Ping - You've got your shit together this season!
GG. Your defense is tough!
enasty19
offline
offline
Originally posted by PING72
If all they do is block, let's get some OT's or TE's in there.
OTs would take a Big OOP penalty, but TE/FB at WR spot would be good.
Edit: Plus, you could always put up catching/speed on a TE and make him more versatile.
If all they do is block, let's get some OT's or TE's in there.
OTs would take a Big OOP penalty, but TE/FB at WR spot would be good.
Edit: Plus, you could always put up catching/speed on a TE and make him more versatile.
Edited by enasty19 on Dec 6, 2010 16:42:45
Nif
offline
offline
Originally posted by enasty19
Originally posted by PING72
If all they do is block, let's get some OT's or TE's in there.
OTs would take a Big OOP penalty, but TE/FB at WR spot would be good.
Edit: Plus, you could always put up catching/speed on a TE and make him more versatile.
Pretty sure Gerr did this with the '85 Bears a couple seasons ago and it didn't quite work out the way he planned.
Originally posted by PING72
If all they do is block, let's get some OT's or TE's in there.
OTs would take a Big OOP penalty, but TE/FB at WR spot would be good.
Edit: Plus, you could always put up catching/speed on a TE and make him more versatile.
Pretty sure Gerr did this with the '85 Bears a couple seasons ago and it didn't quite work out the way he planned.
Nif
offline
offline
Dunno if its worse being a shitty team or being the team that loses to a shitty team three seasons in a row.
GG either way Pain Nation
GG either way Pain Nation
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
