Originally posted by rob4121983
Just for fun looked at your QB's conditioning at the end of games and it wasn't bad. So I guess maybe in the early tiers it would be better to have 2 QB's but at higher levels 1 QB can get the job done.
yeah thats 70 plays a game at 40 conditioning (second wind does help a little), I think morale used to be the big reason teams experimented with two QB's though - i don't know how valid that is
Originally posted by bhall43
Regardless of your composition. You still need to put the right plays into the mix. For passing offenses those plays can be more set it and forget it because passing is only predictable based on what the defense throws at you but it has the ability to adapt. Rushing is not a set it and forget it deal. In fact it is lucky that the DC tactics are completely buggy and tricky because most rushing offenses are entirely predictable to a T. Balanced is without a doubt the best possible path. Especially if you put the right pieces in place.
I guess but judging from GLB we will never be happy with the variety of effective plays available at any given time.
Originally posted by Chevanton10
You dont though you just need a good balance of fast WR and strong WR to cause the D coord to think about the downfield passes and the short ones.
I would rather build 3 superstar WR's with 99 hands, 99 cit, and 99 receiving grip and a TE / some bench receivers who could sprint than anything else at this point, as a QB anyway lol.
Just for fun looked at your QB's conditioning at the end of games and it wasn't bad. So I guess maybe in the early tiers it would be better to have 2 QB's but at higher levels 1 QB can get the job done.
yeah thats 70 plays a game at 40 conditioning (second wind does help a little), I think morale used to be the big reason teams experimented with two QB's though - i don't know how valid that is
Originally posted by bhall43
Regardless of your composition. You still need to put the right plays into the mix. For passing offenses those plays can be more set it and forget it because passing is only predictable based on what the defense throws at you but it has the ability to adapt. Rushing is not a set it and forget it deal. In fact it is lucky that the DC tactics are completely buggy and tricky because most rushing offenses are entirely predictable to a T. Balanced is without a doubt the best possible path. Especially if you put the right pieces in place.
I guess but judging from GLB we will never be happy with the variety of effective plays available at any given time.
Originally posted by Chevanton10
You dont though you just need a good balance of fast WR and strong WR to cause the D coord to think about the downfield passes and the short ones.
I would rather build 3 superstar WR's with 99 hands, 99 cit, and 99 receiving grip and a TE / some bench receivers who could sprint than anything else at this point, as a QB anyway lol.
Edited by Laggo on Jul 27, 2014 23:46:25
