User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > s17 gg thread
Page:
 
5STAR
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by Phil Jackson

Thats like asking Taurran to stop doing the things that are fun for him

I disapprove


If being bitter and bitching about everything is fun...well...that seems like a contradiction to me. But whatever works.


you looking at it wrong...

Saigon game planned for a week 3 game against a newly promoted team and have quite a bit of cares in the forums

Let them have their fun....they deserve it

We will be ready when the games matter more
 
Link
 
Originally posted by taurran

You won't, unless your OC finds another play to run 20+ times in the game that makes consistent yardage. Good luck.


ISLAM, baby..... ISLAM!!!
 
StoutOne
offline
Link
 
lol.
 
Dpride59
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by 5STAR
you looking at it wrong...

Saigon game planned for a week 3 game against a newly promoted team and have quite a bit of cares in the forums

Let them have their fun....they deserve it

We will be ready when the games matter more


Ughhhh, they beat you by 50, have better builds across the board, and the positions you are close to being an equal eff level they have players with 3 aeq where you have one....... Looking at your schedule you need 10 wins to assure a playoff spot, if you get 7 losses you'll be playing s18 in south America ...

Indi
blaze
gunny
cinnci
Lincoln
speyside

can all beat you which would get you an 8th seed, you slip up vs anyone like monowowi, rr, cathrage, you're demoted... Hell I'm nervous about the blaze getting demoted, there are too many good teams for you to be as excited after a 50 pt curbstomping as you are...
 
5STAR
offline
Link
 
it was a game...a game we lost to the best team in GLB...a game where we put forth a terrible gameplan

It is not the end of the world

5-3 was our target after 8 games....after that point the schedule gets quite a bit easier and some more dots hit 72.


PS: if you actually watched the game you would know where I am coming from
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1340986&pbp_id=3974499

LOL at this...hint I had some new DAI situations put in place and forgot to link the DPC plays. SS on WR1 and weak shift

Edited by 5STAR on Aug 3, 2010 14:22:11
Edited by 5STAR on Aug 3, 2010 14:19:43
 
jamz
offline
Link
 
Taurran is Spencer Pratt, IRL. GLB's forum villain.

 
Link
 
Originally posted by jamz
Taurran is Spencer Pratt, IRL. GLB's forum villain.



I googled Spencer Pratt. Style points have been deducted from you for knowing who that person was.

Hell, now I've googled him and I know who he is. I think I may have experience a second-hand deduction.
 
StoutOne
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by 5STAR


PS: if you actually watched the game you would know where I am coming from
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1340986&pbp_id=3974499

LOL at this...



He's going to be doing that all season long....
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1343416&pbp_id=4089272
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1343416&pbp_id=4090288
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1343416&pbp_id=4088520 39.19 what!!
 
5STAR
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by StoutOne DTD
Originally posted by 5STAR



PS: if you actually watched the game you would know where I am coming from
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1340986&pbp_id=3974499

LOL at this...



He's going to be doing that all season long....
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1343416&pbp_id=4089272
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1343416&pbp_id=4090288
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1343416&pbp_id=4088520 39.19 what!!


cool he did it against basic AI because I created new DAI situations and didn't link the plays associated with them...that was my point

SS on WR1 and weak side shift cover 3?

So much fail
Edited by 5STAR on Aug 3, 2010 14:23:32
 
jamz
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JuniorMcSpiffy
Originally posted by jamz

Taurran is Spencer Pratt, IRL. GLB's forum villain.



I googled Spencer Pratt. Style points have been deducted from you for knowing who that person was.

Hell, now I've googled him and I know who he is. I think I may have experience a second-hand deduction.


Victory is mine.
 
tjsexkitten82
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by 5STAR
cool he did it against basic AI because I created new DAI situations and didn't link the plays associated with them...that was my point

SS on WR1 and weak side shift cover 3?

So much fail


5star: Your HB deserves less credit because I'm a shithead who totally fucked up the gameplanning. And that somehow effects the insane speed Dot Right puts out.

......k
 
Link
 
Originally posted by tjking82
Originally posted by 5STAR

cool he did it against basic AI because I created new DAI situations and didn't link the plays associated with them...that was my point

SS on WR1 and weak side shift cover 3?

So much fail


5star: Your HB deserves less credit because I'm a shithead who totally fucked up the gameplanning. And that somehow effects the insane speed Dot Right puts out.

......k


qfeffects
 
Galkuris
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tjking82
5star: Your HB deserves less credit because I'm a shithead who totally fucked up the gameplanning. And that somehow effects the insane speed Dot Right puts out.

......k


You guys really can't comprehend what he is saying can you...he isn't taking credit away from that HB which is an amazing dot. He is saying the AI was screwed up in some circumstances and that some of the blame for getting beat so bad goes on that.

Is he saying Osaka would have won without those mistakes? Nope
Is he saying it likely would have been a closer game? Yup (and it probably would have been).

Take the hate blinders off already.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Galkuris
You guys really can't comprehend what he is saying can you...he isn't taking credit away from that HB which is an amazing dot. He is saying the AI was screwed up in some circumstances and that some of the blame for getting beat so bad goes on that.

Is he saying Osaka would have won without those mistakes? Nope
Is he saying it likely would have been a closer game? Yup (and it probably would have been).

Take the hate blinders off already.


HATE BLINDERS ON!
 
Link
 
Originally posted by ImTheScientist
Originally posted by Galkuris

You guys really can't comprehend what he is saying can you...he isn't taking credit away from that HB which is an amazing dot. He is saying the AI was screwed up in some circumstances and that some of the blame for getting beat so bad goes on that.

Is he saying Osaka would have won without those mistakes? Nope
Is he saying it likely would have been a closer game? Yup (and it probably would have been).

Take the hate blinders off already.


HATE BLINDERS ON!


My car has hate blinkers... and my left hate blinker is always on.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.