Originally posted by Rob.
We won?!
We won?!
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Season 17 Vet Discussion - Madcow talking to Madcow
mutleyddmc DTD
offline
offline
So by virtue of whales only losing by 3. We would best Hawaii too!!!
Whoop
Serious though congrats that's impressive as hell
Whoop
Serious though congrats that's impressive as hell
bhall43
offline
offline
Ya my regular 4 WR defense probably not good for against those guys. I forget HAHA is an all spread team.
bhall43
offline
offline
Pretty surprised about BEEF's dominance over that Miami Sharktapus team too. Those guys have done well against run teams.
FairForever
offline
offline
One of the huge downsides of being in Seasoned is we don't get these in-tier matchups...
HAHA
Salty
PORN
EEA
No Name
really need to all play each other. I'd add Bloody but they got matchups with Salty and EEA already.
No Name has literally played one Seasoned team in ladder so far - and that was against the bottom of the barrel in terms of teams (first ladder game of the season). Outside of the WotW/Marvel/Miami/AK ladder games, it has not been particularly fun or exciting. At least today we get a pretty good team in Sunderland in a matchup that could go either way.
HAHA
Salty
PORN
EEA
No Name
really need to all play each other. I'd add Bloody but they got matchups with Salty and EEA already.
No Name has literally played one Seasoned team in ladder so far - and that was against the bottom of the barrel in terms of teams (first ladder game of the season). Outside of the WotW/Marvel/Miami/AK ladder games, it has not been particularly fun or exciting. At least today we get a pretty good team in Sunderland in a matchup that could go either way.
FairForever
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Pretty surprised about BEEF's dominance over that Miami Sharktapus team too. Those guys have done well against run teams.
Interesting win. 155 yards leading to 19 points is pretty insane. But still - great job.
This Seasoned tier is ridiculously good.
Pretty surprised about BEEF's dominance over that Miami Sharktapus team too. Those guys have done well against run teams.
Interesting win. 155 yards leading to 19 points is pretty insane. But still - great job.
This Seasoned tier is ridiculously good.
Edited by FairForever on Aug 6, 2015 10:54:50
Rob.
offline
offline
Originally posted by FairForever
One of the huge downsides of being in Seasoned is we don't get these in-tier matchups...
HAHA
Salty
PORN
EEA
No Name
really need to all play each other. I'd add Bloody but they got matchups with Salty and EEA already.
No Name has literally played one Seasoned team in ladder so far - and that was against the bottom of the barrel in terms of teams (first ladder game of the season). Outside of the WotW/Marvel/Miami/AK ladder games, it has not been particularly fun or exciting. At least today we get a pretty good team in Sunderland in a matchup that could go either way.
That's a good point and it's something we have clamored for in the past, but there were always detractors.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5224710
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5228235
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5229140
The thing everyone keeps pointing to is global ladder being worthless if we don't play out of tier, but that point is moot now with rankings getting reset each season. There is no bonus for Porn if we finish the season at #1 and 20 spots ahead of everyone else, because we all start the same next season. The only thing that matters is tier trophies when it comes to ladder and those trophies should be decided by the top teams playing each other at least once.
Does that mean seasoned teams should never play journeyman? Absolutely not, but there should be some type of preference for same tier matchups when the ladder schedule is created.
One of the huge downsides of being in Seasoned is we don't get these in-tier matchups...
HAHA
Salty
PORN
EEA
No Name
really need to all play each other. I'd add Bloody but they got matchups with Salty and EEA already.
No Name has literally played one Seasoned team in ladder so far - and that was against the bottom of the barrel in terms of teams (first ladder game of the season). Outside of the WotW/Marvel/Miami/AK ladder games, it has not been particularly fun or exciting. At least today we get a pretty good team in Sunderland in a matchup that could go either way.
That's a good point and it's something we have clamored for in the past, but there were always detractors.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5224710
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5228235
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5229140
The thing everyone keeps pointing to is global ladder being worthless if we don't play out of tier, but that point is moot now with rankings getting reset each season. There is no bonus for Porn if we finish the season at #1 and 20 spots ahead of everyone else, because we all start the same next season. The only thing that matters is tier trophies when it comes to ladder and those trophies should be decided by the top teams playing each other at least once.
Does that mean seasoned teams should never play journeyman? Absolutely not, but there should be some type of preference for same tier matchups when the ladder schedule is created.
Absolut Zero
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Ya my regular 4 WR defense probably not good for against those guys. I forget HAHA is an all spread team.
Excellent! Although your linebackers have enough blitz awareness and speed that outside pitches weren't working all that well against your Over Will.
GG, you guys are making me re-invest in Rec Grip. I recently added 10 to Grip and felt pretty good about it, Knocked Loose totals were way down since that increase, but...
The difference between completion rates of 55.8% and 67.4% were your KL. Time to add more.
Ya my regular 4 WR defense probably not good for against those guys. I forget HAHA is an all spread team.
Excellent! Although your linebackers have enough blitz awareness and speed that outside pitches weren't working all that well against your Over Will.
GG, you guys are making me re-invest in Rec Grip. I recently added 10 to Grip and felt pretty good about it, Knocked Loose totals were way down since that increase, but...
The difference between completion rates of 55.8% and 67.4% were your KL. Time to add more.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Absolut Zero
Excellent! Although your linebackers have enough blitz awareness and speed that outside pitches weren't working all that well against your Over Will.
GG, you guys are making me re-invest in Rec Grip. I recently added 10 to Grip and felt pretty good about it, Knocked Loose totals were way down since that increase, but...
The difference between completion rates of 55.8% and 67.4% were your KL. Time to add more.
Ya thats all those ex BEEF CB's. Terrible cover guys but lots of hard hitting.
Excellent! Although your linebackers have enough blitz awareness and speed that outside pitches weren't working all that well against your Over Will.
GG, you guys are making me re-invest in Rec Grip. I recently added 10 to Grip and felt pretty good about it, Knocked Loose totals were way down since that increase, but...
The difference between completion rates of 55.8% and 67.4% were your KL. Time to add more.
Ya thats all those ex BEEF CB's. Terrible cover guys but lots of hard hitting.
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rob.
The thing everyone keeps pointing to is global ladder being worthless if we don't play out of tier, but that point is moot now with rankings getting reset each season. There is no bonus for Porn if we finish the season at #1 and 20 spots ahead of everyone else, because we all start the same next season. The only thing that matters is tier trophies when it comes to ladder and those trophies should be decided by the top teams playing each other at least once.
Does that mean seasoned teams should never play journeyman? Absolutely not, but there should be some type of preference for same tier matchups when the ladder schedule is created.
This is why I suggested many times to have a 8 or 16 team, single elimination tournament towards the end of the season, using that last 4 games of the ladder.
The thing everyone keeps pointing to is global ladder being worthless if we don't play out of tier, but that point is moot now with rankings getting reset each season. There is no bonus for Porn if we finish the season at #1 and 20 spots ahead of everyone else, because we all start the same next season. The only thing that matters is tier trophies when it comes to ladder and those trophies should be decided by the top teams playing each other at least once.
Does that mean seasoned teams should never play journeyman? Absolutely not, but there should be some type of preference for same tier matchups when the ladder schedule is created.
This is why I suggested many times to have a 8 or 16 team, single elimination tournament towards the end of the season, using that last 4 games of the ladder.
jfbueno
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
This is why I suggested many times to have a 8 or 16 team, single elimination tournament towards the end of the season, using that last 4 games of the ladder.
You do that and you kind of negate all the previous ladder games to that point.
This is why I suggested many times to have a 8 or 16 team, single elimination tournament towards the end of the season, using that last 4 games of the ladder.
You do that and you kind of negate all the previous ladder games to that point.
Xars
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
This is why I suggested many times to have a 8 or 16 team, single elimination tournament towards the end of the season, using that last 4 games of the ladder.
Originally posted by jfbueno
You do that and you kind of negate all the previous ladder games to that point.
I like my past suggestion better.
In the last 2/3/4 Ladder games of the season, priority is given to the highest ranked team in tier you haven't played. It doesn't create a tournament. It just schedules missing opponents in tier.
This is why I suggested many times to have a 8 or 16 team, single elimination tournament towards the end of the season, using that last 4 games of the ladder.
Originally posted by jfbueno
You do that and you kind of negate all the previous ladder games to that point.
I like my past suggestion better.
In the last 2/3/4 Ladder games of the season, priority is given to the highest ranked team in tier you haven't played. It doesn't create a tournament. It just schedules missing opponents in tier.
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by jfbueno
You do that and you kind of negate all the previous ladder games to that point.
No you don't. The first X number of ladder games in the season would be used for seeding and/or making the tournament.
You do that and you kind of negate all the previous ladder games to that point.
No you don't. The first X number of ladder games in the season would be used for seeding and/or making the tournament.
Edited by Galactic Empire on Aug 6, 2015 14:42:31
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
