Well, me and Alpine are having some trouble this season.
Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
Well, me and Alpine are having some trouble this season.
I don't know. Just a very volatile sim. Just beat DD that is ranked at #1 with the same tactics.
Well, me and Alpine are having some trouble this season.
I don't know. Just a very volatile sim. Just beat DD that is ranked at #1 with the same tactics.
Reaper Of The Dead
offline
offline
Yeah, but whatever it is it's making your team look worse than it actually is.
Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
Yeah, but whatever it is it's making your team look worse than it actually is.
Or we have just been lucky up until now
Yeah, but whatever it is it's making your team look worse than it actually is.
Or we have just been lucky up until now

Ancient Sith Lord
offline
offline
Annnnddd.....the B-Squad wins again, making us 6-0 on the season in ladder games.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/46288
Game could have been alot worse. We fumbled twice inside their 5 yard line. Watch this crap:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/46288/1540527?player_id=24262
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/46288/1541570?player_id=18709
362 yards rushing on 65 carries.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/46288
Game could have been alot worse. We fumbled twice inside their 5 yard line. Watch this crap:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/46288/1540527?player_id=24262
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/46288/1541570?player_id=18709
362 yards rushing on 65 carries.
Ancient Sith Lord
offline
offline
Originally posted by cavalier
I don't know. Just a very volatile sim. Just beat DD that is ranked at #1 with the same tactics.
Maybe you should change your tactics and playbook according to each team you play. I change both every game. Just a suggestion.
I don't know. Just a very volatile sim. Just beat DD that is ranked at #1 with the same tactics.
Maybe you should change your tactics and playbook according to each team you play. I change both every game. Just a suggestion.
Originally posted by nortobc
Maybe you should change your tactics and playbook according to each team you play. I change both every game. Just a suggestion.

Would of course be a good idea, but realistically, that just won't happen. I probably should be able to change it more often than every third season though
Maybe you should change your tactics and playbook according to each team you play. I change both every game. Just a suggestion.

Would of course be a good idea, but realistically, that just won't happen. I probably should be able to change it more often than every third season though
Naked Welder
offline
offline
Originally posted by cavalier
Or we have just been lucky up until now
There is a LOT of shithouse luck in this game but, its still decent. The thing I hate is how inaccurate some stats are. When a defender's play results in "Pass incomplete due to nearby defense" and that defender is the only guy around, that should be a PD. Unless PD is Pass Deflection. I thought PD was Passes Defensed? Another thing is INTs. I have a safety in another league and sure, I only have 38 intercepting but, I have 64 in coverage tech, 30" vert (Jumping INTs), and 30 in balance (for INTs in stride supposedly), plenty of speed and stamina, and all special abilities focused on intercepting the ball. I can't explain as to why I have not had a single INT since rookie when my guy sticks to his opponent like glue? You would think the law of averages would get at least one in an entire season with well above average coverage skills? I wouldn't expect Richard Sherman type numbers but you would think I could get an INT once every 4 or 5 games with the points I have spent? Oh well I guess.
Or we have just been lucky up until now
There is a LOT of shithouse luck in this game but, its still decent. The thing I hate is how inaccurate some stats are. When a defender's play results in "Pass incomplete due to nearby defense" and that defender is the only guy around, that should be a PD. Unless PD is Pass Deflection. I thought PD was Passes Defensed? Another thing is INTs. I have a safety in another league and sure, I only have 38 intercepting but, I have 64 in coverage tech, 30" vert (Jumping INTs), and 30 in balance (for INTs in stride supposedly), plenty of speed and stamina, and all special abilities focused on intercepting the ball. I can't explain as to why I have not had a single INT since rookie when my guy sticks to his opponent like glue? You would think the law of averages would get at least one in an entire season with well above average coverage skills? I wouldn't expect Richard Sherman type numbers but you would think I could get an INT once every 4 or 5 games with the points I have spent? Oh well I guess.
Ancient Sith Lord
offline
offline
I scout every team I am about to play and make the proper adjustments. EX: I put in a bunch of sweeps out of I-Form and Strong I because I knew Minnesota ran LILB Lurk against that formation. The LILB blitzes and gets locked up with the TE, and if my WR2 gets a good block (which he does most of the time) then the FB just has to take out the safety and I have a 10+ yard gain every time.
Motiak
offline
offline
6-2 in the Ladder today so we have another guaranteed non-losing week. Let's make it 10-2.
Donqueodie
offline
offline
Originally posted by Motiak
6-2 in the Ladder today so we have another guaranteed non-losing week. Let's make it 10-2.
Make that 6-5 now, winning record rides on Rhode Island
6-2 in the Ladder today so we have another guaranteed non-losing week. Let's make it 10-2.
Make that 6-5 now, winning record rides on Rhode Island
NiborRis
offline
offline
Recapping last week:
Tampa won 19-14
Deeproute lost 13-24
Helmand lost 24-41
B-Squad won 20-10
MoD lost 30-49
Detroit won 23-0
Alpine lost 0-45
Xombi won 51-0
KC won 35-14
Toast lost 14-20
Gangsters won 28-24
RI lost 7-14
6-6, our first .500 week as Stobie mentioned.
Tampa won 19-14
Deeproute lost 13-24
Helmand lost 24-41
B-Squad won 20-10
MoD lost 30-49
Detroit won 23-0
Alpine lost 0-45
Xombi won 51-0
KC won 35-14
Toast lost 14-20
Gangsters won 28-24
RI lost 7-14
6-6, our first .500 week as Stobie mentioned.
NiborRis
offline
offline
And now for week 7:
#9 Tampa vs #7 Queen City Brewmasters
#36 Deeproute vs #30 Iowa Rogues
#69 Helmand vs #71 Baltimore BrewMasters
#93 B-Squad vs #96 Portland Cardinals
#27 MoD vs #34 Bloodless Brotherhood
#16 Detroit vs #25 Black Ice en Fuego
#16 Alpine vs #22 Mr Men
#133 Xombi vs #138 Tacoma Tugs
#52 KC vs #46 Warsaw Wrath
#107 Toast vs #110 Music City Miracle
#49 Gangsters vs #60 New York Masons
#153 RI vs #146 All Rapacious Wolverines
Detroit and Alpine tied? Nice.
#9 Tampa vs #7 Queen City Brewmasters
#36 Deeproute vs #30 Iowa Rogues
#69 Helmand vs #71 Baltimore BrewMasters
#93 B-Squad vs #96 Portland Cardinals
#27 MoD vs #34 Bloodless Brotherhood
#16 Detroit vs #25 Black Ice en Fuego
#16 Alpine vs #22 Mr Men
#133 Xombi vs #138 Tacoma Tugs
#52 KC vs #46 Warsaw Wrath
#107 Toast vs #110 Music City Miracle
#49 Gangsters vs #60 New York Masons
#153 RI vs #146 All Rapacious Wolverines
Detroit and Alpine tied? Nice.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





still not a losing record but first 500 week. 





















