User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Africa AAA League > Africa AAA #2 > Buckwheat's Africa AAA #2 Rankings & Predictions!
Page:
 
Rhuin
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by nfratami
Originally posted by Rhuin

You had no run game,,,, and couldn't stop theirs. And when they did pass they were very efficient, high % and avg. Not completely owned but a very sound win, very efficient win. .

And the masses cheered.


The masses also cheered when we beat your 6th place team by 24.

Who the hell comes here and talks trash about a game they weren't even in.

Pigs = pwned.

Mambas = gonna get pwned.

Also, try watching the game, our run game did what it needed to (apparently 120 yards on the ground is no run game) it converted a lot of short yardage situations for us. The run game wasn't the problem -4 turnover margin was.



pfffft, I want to see if your TO sized head will actualy explode one day. I could comment even if my team was 0-13, I comment because your a sore loser, it's sort of what the forum is for. You lost, you make excuses, it looks weak.
Last edited Jan 27, 2009 15:50:57
 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Tikker
1 turnover was meaningless 2nd last play of the game

you didn't stop their run at all (200+ yards)

they had heat on your QB and forced turnovers

you got beat, fair and square



Yeah we lost, never said we didn't.

Just saying that balls we tipped weren't picked and theirs were, aka RNG pwnt us.
Last edited Jan 27, 2009 15:57:31
 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rhuin

pfffft, I want to see if your TO sized head will actualy explode one day. I could comment even if my team was 0-13, I comment because your a sore loser, it's sort of what the forum is for. You lost, you make excuses, it looks weak.


Well, congrats on being satisfied with living vicariously through other teams instead of being good yourself.

All my trash talk on here is just joking around, it never becomes an issue until some douche like you takes it personally and starts a fight.

It's a bit hypocritical to say that talking trash on the forums is ok because that's what the forums are for when you are trash talking me for doing the same.
 
Rhuin
offline
Link
 
Actualy I was not intially trash talking you at all, I was pointing out the obvious discrepancy in the numbers. I actualy said it was NOT being owned, the fact that you make yourself a target, even in good fun, means that also in "good fun" you should not expect to be adored and defended at every turn, alas "the masses cheered" can't really be called "trash talking" you can't be that sensative, that's what lit your fuse, looks at your response. As people love T.O, people can't stand T.O, all is fair when you take on that role, all in good fun that is, you can't seriously expect your constant yabbering and trash talk to be a 1 way street...... Mr Ricky is just way to defensive.
Last edited Jan 27, 2009 16:10:53
 
lapham1
offline
Link
 
GG Greats. Someone had to lose. I'm just glad we put up a decent fight against a great team. Hopefully we can continue our win streak through the end of the season and in to the playoffs.

As stated above a few simple breaks go the other way and my team would have lost.
Last edited Jan 27, 2009 16:15:27
 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rhuin

And the masses cheered.


Trash talking imo.
 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lapham1
GG Greats. Someone had to lose. I'm just glad we put up a decent fight against a great team. Hopefully we can continue our win streak through the end of the season and in to the playoffs.

As stated above a few simple breaks go the other way and my team would have lost.


GG to you too.
 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
I think the thing that bothered me most was the 3 back to back to back sacks. We drive down the field and then that happens. There was a total of 1 sack the rest of the game, tough to swallow.
 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rhuin
Actualy I was not intially trash talking you at all, I was pointing out the obvious discrepancy in the numbers.


TOTAL NET YARDS 392 377

There wasn't a huge discrepancy with any numbers besides turnovers, which you didn't even mention. Great analysis.
 
whydowork
offline
Link
 
When good teams get together, alot of it comes down to the RNG. Offense looked good on both sides of the ball. I look forward to playing the Greats in the last game. I hope I can get my offense up for the task.
 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by whydowork
When good teams get together, alot of it comes down to the RNG. Offense looked good on both sides of the ball. I look forward to playing the Greats in the last game. I hope I can get my offense up for the task.


Yeah, the game will def have some huge seeding implications.
 
Rhuin
offline
Link
 
53 Devil offensive snaps to get those yards compared to 84, top 2 backs from each team YPC Greats 3.75 to Devils 7, Jerome was a beast at 17 carries for 10 ypc. Higher avg per pass, although less passes, they got yards from those, that's why I called their game efficient. Hey and turnovers are part of the game, something this game should have is team +/-. Numbers can be split however someone wants to see them, I admit that. So remember I did not say "owned" I called it an "efficient game", "a solid win", my comment was to say it was not all about the TO's, not to trash you.

Last edited Jan 27, 2009 16:39:19
 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by nfratami
Originally posted by Rhuin


And the masses cheered.


Trash talking imo.


 
nfratami
offline
Link
 
Lol way to key in on a key stat by the way, Total Plays! lol

The only thing numbers wise that mattered in that game was turnovers, not yards per play or anything like that. If anything us running more offensive plays should have benefited us by tiring their defense.
 
britdevine316
offline
Link
 
BBE by at least 17 over Toros IMO
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.