Warrior General Games

Originally posted by BoDiddley
Like Laser Arm(high passing power) who threw this Int in the endzone against a CPU defender? http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/470218/78807?player_id=262729

Running Streaks on the 5 yard line.

Originally posted by o The Boss x
Your one example from rookie shows that the guy with the most picks in the game had heavily invested in int for a sophomore build... How do we know how much int a CPU has? From my understanding I would their builds are rounded af so I would guess their int is just as high as their other skills.

Fair point, don't really know the int ability of CPU players. But considering they're rookie tier their Int SP can't be too high(maybe 30-40 at best). Definitely not 5 Ints worthy. High FF players have to be 70+ just to even get FFs consistently.

Originally posted by TyDavis315
No he's actually right. Combo backs are fucking irritating and the fact that they can return the ball too is annoying as well....

Which is exactly why I have one on roster.

Thank you. It is a hell of a lot easier to tackle a power back than a combo back.

i have a superstar on the miracle with very high intercepting (80+). He had 9 all of last season. He'd probably be a guy to watch in vet

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/246323

Originally posted by BoDiddley

Like Laser Arm(high passing power) who threw this Int in the endzone against a CPU defender? http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/470218/78807?player_id=262729



He threw the ball right into the hands of the DB. I'd be pissed if he didn't INT it...and last season, that is a drop. Like Corndog said, don't run streaks from the 5 yard line.

Where is Xars with his 2 cents?

Originally posted by Corndog
Running Streaks on the 5 yard line.

LOL, probably not the best choice of play for them, but still would expect a good QB to hit the WR at the back of the endzone. If he can't thread the needle with all that passing power, then it makes one wonder if its wise to invest heavily in the SP.

Ints were way too low before, its just that they're too high now for low Int players. Really just needs to be balanced. Fix ur changes

Originally posted by TyDavis315
Why are we glossing over the fact that the guy had 16 TDs.... A 16:4 TD/Int ratio in real life would be enough to make a defensive coordinator shit his pants and break all available tablets on deck. And one or two of the guys that had picks weren't even CPU

Add that to the fact that he also had over 1000 yards and an insane completion rate for what, 77 passes.... Jesus fucking Christ that's nothing to complain about. CPU defenders most likely have more int than we put into our guys, there have been CPU players intercepting passes for the longest so this is just making them a little better.

There are about 3 DBs on the Denver Yellowjackets that have no points in intercepting or deflecting (and as the DC that irks the shit out of me) yet they all pulled in at least 3 interceptions last season.

In 16 games there are guys in the NFL pulling in 6-8 interceptions faithfully. In 30 games I don't see why a DB can't pull in at least 7-9
1) They got 16 TDs against a near human-less roster though. Against a good team, those 4 Ints will kill you on the field. Especially once people start pumping up Int to 70+ levels. A good RB will drop 10-15 TDs on that team with 1000+ yds too.

2) We've had high int players, Victoria's Secret comes to mind. It's always been the cost that dissuades people from investing. http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/176023

A buff was needed, but the rate has more than tripled since the changes.

Streaks in the end zone is actually brilliant most times because once the wr runs put of real estate they do whatever they want and generally find themselves open while the cb looks completely lost.

Originally posted by bhall43
Streaks in the end zone is actually brilliant most times because once the wr runs put of real estate they do whatever they want and generally find themselves open while the cb looks completely lost.

Unless the QB throws the ball right into the hands of the DB, which should be INT.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Unless the QB throws the ball right into the hands of the DB, which should be INT.

You must have missed the part where I said the cb gets lost.

I say stick with the high INT rates, he'll raise the FF rates too! We have had dominant eras of pure passing and pure rushing. Why is it such a bad thing that defense gets some time to shine. I personally think that defensive turnovers are one of the most exciting things in this game. I will take the good and the bad that come from them (pick 6 today for a BSB LB!). Haha. I know that turning the ball over is frustrating for every offense, but how many of us have been running absurd offenses with ridiculous numbers over these many seasons. I am all for an increased amount of turnovers. HBs averaging over 10YPC is crazy unrealistic too. No point in trying to keep the game within "normal" limits of statistical probabilities when it never has been!

GO DEFENSE!!!!

I love more turnovers too, i just hope that every pick doesn't turn into a pick 6, LBs are crazy fast here.

Originally posted by Detroit Leos
I say stick with the high INT rates, he'll raise the FF rates too! We have had dominant eras of pure passing and pure rushing. Why is it such a bad thing that defense gets some time to shine. I personally think that defensive turnovers are one of the most exciting things in this game.

GO DEFENSE!!!!

It actually makes the Offensive coordinator think before throwing into triple coverage down field on 75% of the passes without worrying about the ball being intercepted.

I have always thought the most OP part of this game is throwing into triple coverage, 10+ yards downfield and the WR catching it like 80% of the time.