FYI...cugel is the godfather of the CPU challenge. Here is the proof...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5213414
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5213414
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > The CPU Challenge
good game Muttley. was close the whole way through. both our kickers stunk....as per usual.
Originally posted by Dee.
FYI...cugel is the godfather of the CPU challenge. Here is the proof...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5213414
that was an awesome thread -- and I will gladly agree - he is the godfather
FYI...cugel is the godfather of the CPU challenge. Here is the proof...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5213414
that was an awesome thread -- and I will gladly agree - he is the godfather
Originally posted by TxSteve
that was an awesome thread -- and I will gladly agree - he is the godfather
oops - I thought that was the thread where the guy was complaining that CPU players needed to be nerfed because he lost to Cugel
that was an awesome thread -- and I will gladly agree - he is the godfather
oops - I thought that was the thread where the guy was complaining that CPU players needed to be nerfed because he lost to Cugel
Originally posted by TxSteve
oops - I thought that was the thread where the guy was complaining that CPU players needed to be nerfed because he lost to Cugel
I loved that one
...anybody remember where it was?
oops - I thought that was the thread where the guy was complaining that CPU players needed to be nerfed because he lost to Cugel
I loved that one
...anybody remember where it was?Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
not sure if this is it....but it is close
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5145987
I just down voted it.
not sure if this is it....but it is close
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5145987
I just down voted it.
Ok - 25 games into the season and it is time for an update. I haven't watched. Thought I would take a little more detailed look.
Science Fair: 18-7 - I think we beat one top 10 opponent in Muttley's turtles or whatever - not sure if we beat any others. 6 of our 10 losses were within 10 points - so with some RNG help (and better coaching) - I think we could be a lot better than 18-7. I got blown out by DD - but a: he's good and b: I tossed together some random terrible defense with a bunch of broken plays...and I changed up my O to include some pass plays that he just obliterated with ZEB (so I would sum that up as I probably got out coached...or I made a bunch of mistakes).
Currently sitting at #11 in the ladder and likely to be the #1 seed in the playoffs.
All told I've run 18 different inside running plays
17 outside runs
4 off tackles
28 passing plays
(kind of cheating though because Viper coached for me on 5 or 6 games when i was out of town)
The bulk of my passing: 702 of my 1865 passing plays were Big I TE Crosses - completed 50.6% for 10.6 per catch. It is my opinion that this play is overpowered. I wish there was a defensive play that would shut it down better in rookie.
Bulk of my defense: Zero Edge Blitz
---------------------------------------------------------
Pink and Black Attack - 18-6-1 (currently #10 in ladder) - 3 of their losses within 3. They have beaten some good teams too but I don't keep track very well. They are playoff bound.
Looking at their offense:
17 inside runs
8 outside
1 off tackle
47 passes
The bulk of their offense is 838 of 2065 passes - was SG WR Hook and Big I TE Crosses.
The majority of their defense is ZEB / Shallow Will / OWMB1
------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck 16-9 and 18th in ladder. 4 of their losses within 10 - playoff bound
They have run on O:
8 inside
7 outside
2 off tackle
12 pass plays
They've tried a lot more QB rollouts than the other teams. Their passing isn't as spammy - though that could be because they invested in a running QB.
On D: they are very heavy on ZEB and OWMB1.
Science Fair: 18-7 - I think we beat one top 10 opponent in Muttley's turtles or whatever - not sure if we beat any others. 6 of our 10 losses were within 10 points - so with some RNG help (and better coaching) - I think we could be a lot better than 18-7. I got blown out by DD - but a: he's good and b: I tossed together some random terrible defense with a bunch of broken plays...and I changed up my O to include some pass plays that he just obliterated with ZEB (so I would sum that up as I probably got out coached...or I made a bunch of mistakes).
Currently sitting at #11 in the ladder and likely to be the #1 seed in the playoffs.
All told I've run 18 different inside running plays
17 outside runs
4 off tackles
28 passing plays
(kind of cheating though because Viper coached for me on 5 or 6 games when i was out of town)
The bulk of my passing: 702 of my 1865 passing plays were Big I TE Crosses - completed 50.6% for 10.6 per catch. It is my opinion that this play is overpowered. I wish there was a defensive play that would shut it down better in rookie.
Bulk of my defense: Zero Edge Blitz
---------------------------------------------------------
Pink and Black Attack - 18-6-1 (currently #10 in ladder) - 3 of their losses within 3. They have beaten some good teams too but I don't keep track very well. They are playoff bound.
Looking at their offense:
17 inside runs
8 outside
1 off tackle
47 passes
The bulk of their offense is 838 of 2065 passes - was SG WR Hook and Big I TE Crosses.
The majority of their defense is ZEB / Shallow Will / OWMB1
------------------------------------------------------------
Fvck 16-9 and 18th in ladder. 4 of their losses within 10 - playoff bound
They have run on O:
8 inside
7 outside
2 off tackle
12 pass plays
They've tried a lot more QB rollouts than the other teams. Their passing isn't as spammy - though that could be because they invested in a running QB.
On D: they are very heavy on ZEB and OWMB1.
Edited by TxSteve on Oct 5, 2015 09:51:43
no surprise there I think. For those with experience:
Spam ZEB / Shallows / OWMB1
Spam Big I TE Cross / hooks / and 3-4 others
Build fast blitzers
Build TEs who can catch
Blow out newbs.
Spam ZEB / Shallows / OWMB1
Spam Big I TE Cross / hooks / and 3-4 others
Build fast blitzers
Build TEs who can catch
Blow out newbs.
Majestic Gent
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
no surprise there I think. For those with experience:
Spam ZEB / Shallows / OWMB1
Spam Big I TE Cross / hooks / and 3-4 others
Build fast blitzers
Build TEs who can catch
Blow out newbs.
That's a fundamental flaw in GLB2 IMHO.
no surprise there I think. For those with experience:
Spam ZEB / Shallows / OWMB1
Spam Big I TE Cross / hooks / and 3-4 others
Build fast blitzers
Build TEs who can catch
Blow out newbs.
That's a fundamental flaw in GLB2 IMHO.
Should be a Rookie Challenge
No ZEB / Shallows / OWMB1/ Engage 8
No Big I TE Cross / SG WR hooks / SB TE Post/ I FL Hitch
No ZEB / Shallows / OWMB1/ Engage 8
No Big I TE Cross / SG WR hooks / SB TE Post/ I FL Hitch
Absolut Zero
offline
offline
Hmm, Rookie Challenge teams should try and replicate what they're doing with Zone D...for funsies. At least Cover 3 Tiger can generate pressure well.
since the goal is to win some games...that kind of goes against the plan... 
I have run some zone this season. who knows - maybe some of my MLB/CB/SS/FS have zone investments....beats me
I have run some zone this season. who knows - maybe some of my MLB/CB/SS/FS have zone investments....beats me
Good Game Wildcats. That started ugly and we never recovered (you caused a sack fumble on our first offensive play that you turned into a touchdown).
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
