User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Notable Vet Games 7/25
Page:
 
TDiddy8701
offline
Link
 
With Hub and MeM losing, GA moves up and DA is now a 1,2 matchup for todays game...

If GA loses and Madison wins, we might leapfrog up to #2 after being #5 before today
 
Kayoh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Absolut Zero
GG Hub City. I recommend switching up your offensive playbook.

Btw, I think it's really clear the TFL stat isn't working right. I'm counting Shane Dasforth got tackled behind the line of scrimmage 11 times, yet the box score says only once.

Dasforth has been a really fucking weird case. He's got just as much power running as Morris Hammonds (100), gives up about 5 car grip and 7 car awr, but then he's got 9 more balance, 11 more intim, 25 more quickness and sprinting, AND he's not on return duty, and yet somehow he manages to break significantly fewer tackles by comparison. Dasforth has broken 150 tackles in 396 attempts while Hammonds has broken 225 in 363 attempts...38% vs. 62%, I have no clue what's even happening.
Edited by Kayoh on Aug 3, 2015 17:07:00
 
Absolut Zero
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Kayoh

Dasforth has been a really fucking weird case. He's got just as much power running as Morris Hammonds (100), gives up about 5 car grip and 7 car awr, but then he's got 9 more balance, 11 more intim, 25 more quickness and sprinting, AND he's not on return duty, and yet somehow he manages to break significantly fewer tackles by comparison. Dasforth has broken 150 tackles in 396 attempts while Hammonds has broken 225 in 363 attempts...38% vs. 62%, I have no clue what's even happening.


He has less than 1/3rd the fumbles Hammonds has. Is it possible his SA's Mr. Reliable and/or B4I (don't know if he's actually got either) are firing and thus preventing Power Through from firing? Hammonds could be breaking a crap ton of tackles on special teams.

That said...from looking at his BP Reps, I'm thinking he's got a serious energy problem. Hammonds is on ST, yet is getting almost as many reps as Dasforth.
 
Kayoh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Absolut Zero
He has less than 1/3rd the fumbles Hammonds has. Is it possible his SA's Mr. Reliable and/or B4I (don't know if he's actually got either) are firing and thus preventing Power Through from firing? Hammonds could be breaking a crap ton of tackles on special teams.

That said...from looking at his BP Reps, I'm thinking he's got a serious energy problem. Hammonds is on ST, yet is getting almost as many reps as Dasforth.

Dasforth has gold PT, gold Freight Train and silver Mr. R. Hammonds has gold PT, gold Mr. R and silver Grinder.

Hammonds does have more conditioning than Dasforth...that's the only thing that it could be. Dasforth has 44, Hammonds has 56, but that doesn't seem like an extreme enough difference to make up for everything else that Dasforth has higher.
 
TDiddy8701
offline
Link
 
nevermind on the Madison moving up thing...

despite the big win... apparently ELO still not good enough to overtake the two new 3-loss teams (MeM and Hub)
 
Kayoh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
nevermind on the Madison moving up thing...

despite the big win... apparently ELO still not good enough to overtake the two new 3-loss teams (MeM and Hub)

no worries dude, you'll at least overtake Hub by the end of the season. We aren't built to hang with teams like FSM, LZ, you guys, Mercy Flush, etc...teams that can stop the run will crush us and we don't have the man power (5 CBs, 2 coverage LBs) on defense to stop it.
 
Galithor
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Kayoh

Dasforth has gold PT, gold Freight Train and silver Mr. R. Hammonds has gold PT, gold Mr. R and silver Grinder.

Hammonds does have more conditioning than Dasforth...that's the only thing that it could be. Dasforth has 44, Hammonds has 56, but that doesn't seem like an extreme enough difference to make up for everything else that Dasforth has higher.


I'd think 44 is woefully low. I think 56 is low honestly.
 
Kayoh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galithor
I'd think 44 is woefully low. I think 56 is low honestly.

it's a 3 RB rotation. Death Tank is at 63 in a 2 RB rotation.
 
McGruffHawk
offline
Link
 
GG DA. I had hopes, and you crushed them.
 
Galithor
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Kayoh

it's a 3 RB rotation. Death Tank is at 63 in a 2 RB rotation.


It's not about the max energy to start plays. It's about how fast it drops during a play. Dasforth is probably hitting his first tackler with much, much less energy on average comparted to Hammonds or DT. So his "effective" power running would be lower consistently when he start getting tackled.
 
Kayoh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galithor
It's not about the max energy to start plays. It's about how fast it drops during a play. Dasforth is probably hitting his first tackler with much, much less energy on average comparted to Hammonds or DT. So his "effective" power running would be lower consistently when he start getting tackled.

I messaged the agent about getting conditioning up. I was hoping he'd cap conditioning before capping intim, but what're you gonna do.
 
Rob.
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by McGruffHawk
GG DA. I had hopes, and you crushed them.


GG. I'm camping, so you guys got the Parab00n special.
 
TDiddy8701
offline
Link
 
#2, #3, and #4 lose... and we're still at #5...

Geez, our ELO sucks for losing 3 games for a combined 10 points this season (all to top 10 teams), and beating #1 and #2 overall

I still don't understand the ladder formula...

if someone can explain why #2, #3, #4, and #5 are where they are at, I would enjoy hearing it
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Aug 3, 2015 19:05:00
 
Kayoh
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
#2, #3, and #4 lose... and we're still at #5...

Geez, our ELO sucks for losing 3 games for a combined 10 points this season (all to top 10 teams), and beating #1 and #2 overall

I still don't understand the ladder formula...

if someone can explain why #2, #3, #4, and #5 are where they are at, I would enjoy hearing it

jesus fuck dude, be more salty
 
TDiddy8701
offline
Link
 
I wasn't being salty actually, i was just wondering what is included in the ladder formula... it probably came across more brash than I mean't it to
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.