Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jfbueno
Watching the game right now and I have to say The Village Breast Cancer Awareness whatever the hell you want to call them is pretty much playing perfect defense right now. I'm very surprised/impressed.

Yeah and they went 4 WR pass spam, when they are normally 50/50 run pass out of that formation. They gambled and went all in on one thing and it paid off. GG jhigg.

Holding you to 3 YPR doesn't help much either.

Originally posted by Rob.
Yeah and they went 4 WR pass spam, when they are normally 50/50 run pass out of that formation. They gambled and went all in on one thing and it paid off. GG jhigg.

yea i needed to switch it up rob. no apologies here but gg rob u had me sweating while i was in the scout process i literally made changes and i mean a huge change with 44 secs left before the game

ty internet for not being slow

everybody go get your comcast xfinity lol

gg rob

And SEATTLE FALLS!

The Team That Shall Never Hold a Name for Too Long upsets #1 Seattle by gambling on an all pass attack which is out of character for them and running a very tight and efficient run defense. Seattle much like MEM relied heavily on their QB runs to get the job done with 27 carries 9 yards vs the HB 32 for 165.5 yards. It ended up being the difference as it caused enough stops that's the gamble on offense was efficient enough to seal the deal. Seattle though is more then strong enough to keep there #1 ranking. Now how will the rest of the season play?

Prediction was Seattle by 10

Seattle lost 6-21

Link in OP.

Originally posted by jhiggseiu14
yea i needed to switch it up rob. no apologies here but gg rob u had me sweating while i was in the scout process i literally made changes and i mean a huge change with 44 secs left before the game

ty internet for not being slow

everybody go get your comcast xfinity lol

gg rob

Yeah you guys definitely belong in the top 5 now in my eyes.

Originally posted by Zaranthuul
And SEATTLE FALLS!

The Team That Shall Never Hold a Name for Too Long upsets #1 Seattle by gambling on an all pass attack which is out of character for them and running a very tight and efficient run defense. Seattle much like MEM relied heavily on their QB runs to get the job done with 27 carries 9 yards vs the HB 32 for 165.5 yards. It ended up being the difference as it caused enough stops that's the gamble on offense was efficient enough to seal the deal. Seattle though is more then strong enough to keep there #1 ranking. Now how will the rest of the season play?

Prediction was Seattle by

Seattle lost 6-21

Link in OP.

I still wouldn't consider a near 50-50 split as relying heavily on the QB runs but that's just me

Originally posted by jfbueno
I still wouldn't consider a near 50-50 split as relying heavily on the QB runs but that's just me

When 3 players are involved and 1 = 2 its not an even split. Especially when such reliance as just seen can cripple a team bad. My HB had a 6+ypc and probably the only time I'll ever be able to brag that I beat the other 2 in yardage or efficiency. The gamble defensively for jhigg was key on the qb. He got thrashed (just looking at stats) by the HB holding the QB to 18 tfl on 27 carries and only 9 yards.

Originally posted by Zaranthuul
When 3 players are involved and 1 = 2 its not an even split. Especially when such reliance as just seen can cripple a team bad. My HB had a 6+ypc and probably the only time I'll ever be able to brag that I beat the other 2 in yardage or efficiency. The gamble defensively for jhigg was key on the qb. He got thrashed (just looking at stats) by the HB holding the QB to 18 tfl on 27 carries and only 9 yards.

You're looking at it in terms of each individual splitting runs which in that case then sure, heavily QB reliant. The way I look at it is if it's just called a qb run or hb run, doesn't matter who is carrying it. The way I see it a 50/50 split isn't really crippling if you try to balance things out. Obviously if you stop one form of running or the other it'll help your chances but that's the risk you take with a 100% running team.

Originally posted by jfbueno
Surprised by the final score but after watching the game hub city didn't do themselves any favors with that offensive game plan

Good game from the hornets nonetheless but I'd like to see them try that versus Seattle or MEM.





Originally posted by jhiggseiu14
I'm slowly deleting that list...

But GG Hubcity CHECK

GG Seatlle.CHECK

MEM, DWC next? Factory Rematch?

Originally posted by jfbueno
You're looking at it in terms of each individual splitting runs which in that case then sure, heavily QB reliant. The way I look at it is if it's just called a qb run or hb run, doesn't matter who is carrying it. The way I see it a 50/50 split isn't really crippling if you try to balance things out. Obviously if you stop one form of running or the other it'll help your chances but that's the risk you take with a 100% running team.

It is matter of perspective and for me I detest qb run reliance. You can justify it as 50/50 qb/hb but when you do that it makes it more efficient to gamble on stopping the qb. Qb is one build vs 2 builds on HB and more then likely different effectiveness. So stop the QB and you stop half the offense. Safe gamble in my mind.

Originally posted by jhiggseiu14
GG Seatlle.

MEM, DWC next?

I'm always game especially since I'm now easily the questionable top 5 team after losing 2 ranks (after league game) when we had a 41 point blow out win. My League isn't as strong as the others.

Originally posted by Zaranthuul
It is matter of perspective and for me I detest qb run reliance. You can justify it as 50/50 qb/hb but when you do that it makes it more efficient to gamble on stopping the qb. Qb is one build vs 2 builds on HB and more then likely different effectiveness. So stop the QB and you stop half the offense. Safe gamble in my mind.

Well then you'll be interested in seeing how MEM changes this off-season more than likely. We were going to change this off-season a little but held back until things started to pan out offensively some more.

Originally posted by Zaranthuul
It is matter of perspective and for me I detest qb run reliance. You can justify it as 50/50 qb/hb but when you do that it makes it more efficient to gamble on stopping the qb. Qb is one build vs 2 builds on HB and more then likely different effectiveness. So stop the QB and you stop half the offense. Safe gamble in my mind.

And the problem with gambling on stopping the QB is you are more than likely leaving the middle vulnerable against the HB.

Originally posted by jfbueno
And the problem with gambling on stopping the QB is you are more than likely leaving the middle vulnerable against the HB.

I haven't watched the game but. 18 tfl on 27 touches kills drives. You play 50/50 qb/hb and you focus on killing the qb you don't have sustainability from the HB. Because you run too many chances of qb being called 2 of 3 times in a set of downs over the drive. I'll give up 5-6 ypc to a HB when over the course of a drive its likely to stall because of qb.

Remember we held Seattle to 9 last season and MEM to 14. We just stalled on offense ourselves. But all 3 teams are much improved compared to last season. So just looking to get my chances to validate my team. Its my turn to prove I belong in top 5 now especially when my goal is ladder trophy to go with league ship.

Originally posted by Zaranthuul
I haven't watched the game but. 18 tfl on 27 touches kills drives. You play 50/50 qb/hb and you focus on killing the qb you don't have sustainability from the HB. Because you run too many chances of qb being called 2 of 3 times in a set of downs over the drive. I'll give up 5-6 ypc to a HB when over the course of a drive its likely to stall because of qb.

Remember we held Seattle to 9 last season and MEM to 14. We just stalled on offense ourselves. But all 3 teams are much improved compared to last season. So just looking to get my chances to validate my team. Its my turn to prove I belong in top 5 now especially when my goal is ladder trophy to go with league ship.



its a tough road but with a dangerous pass game and smart scouting anything is possible.

gamechanger