Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Valtookan
GG to the Los Angeles Outlaws. Really close, sucked that we could bring down Leonel Messi at the end.

Yeah gg guys. Inside run for the win haha

Originally posted by Valtookan
GG to the Los Angeles Outlaws. Really close, sucked that we could bring down Leonel Messi at the end.

GG for sure. Crazy how bad defense was.

That was a wild game.

Originally posted by bhall43
GG for sure. Crazy how bad defense was.

CiT is silly

Originally posted by HayRow
CiT is silly

I've been saying this for years...

Originally posted by HayRow
CiT is silly

Ain't that the truth.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
I've been saying this for years...

Yeah but youve been saying it while running zone which everyone told you was weak v pass

And zone would be much better vs the pass if CiT wasn't so powerful. I have very quick, hard hitting guys that are constantly smothering the WRs when they catch the ball in traffic.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
And zone would be much better vs the pass if CiT wasn't so powerful. I have very quick, hard hitting guys that are constantly smothering the WRs when they catch the ball in traffic.

Zone is already a lot stronger v most rushing plays though, kinda asking for best of both worlds here

As per usual you're requests involve making your team stronger. Maybe we should also limit the zone capabilities v the rush as i feel they're too strong. And it causes way too many passes knocked loose too

lol...no. My zone is good because my builds are good. If you think zone is OP, you are crazy.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
lol...no. My zone is good because my builds are good. If you think zone is OP, you are crazy.

It is for the knocked loose you get... if you want better pass coverage in zone, then theyd have to negate the benefits of it, which are forced fumbles and intercepts. Which you thrive off

Originally posted by Valtookan
GG to the Los Angeles Outlaws. Really close, sucked that we could bring down Leonel Messi at the end.

Now that's a run.

Originally posted by HayRow
Yeah gg guys. Inside run for the win haha

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/456481/391384

Originally posted by jakedood
It is for the knocked loose you get... if you want better pass coverage in zone, then theyd have to negate the benefits of it, which are forced fumbles and intercepts. Which you thrive off

I thrive off knock loose, int and FFumb because I build my defense for that. And teams still pass against me...so don't talk trash about zone being awesome against the pass because it isn't.

Bottom line...WRs catch too many passes while getting blanketed by defenders.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
I thrive off knock loose, int and FFumb because I build my defense for that. And teams still pass against me...so don't talk trash about zone being awesome against the pass because it isn't.

Bottom line...WRs catch too many passes while getting blanketed by defenders.

Its not. But in saying if it became as good v the pass as man coverage then there's have to be a conpromise so there's pros and con's to both methods. Rather than giving zone both the hard hitting ability and the strong coverage.

Plus you're defense is great v all but the best TEs

Originally posted by jakedood
Rather than giving zone both the hard hitting ability and the strong coverage.


LOL...this is a build thing. You can build hard hitting, man to man coverage guys.