Warrior General Games

Also, BSB has now run 65 different pass plays at least once this season. Forgive me if proper Gameplanning against a known incoming blitz spam results in me sticking to a handful of plays in a game.

Originally posted by Rob.
Unique gameplans are easier done when not facing a blitz spam. Easier to beat the blitz spam with an anti-blitz spam.

Also, quit hating

lol. I know, I beat you last season with this twice as well

thats the thing tho...You asked and blamed my Gameplan that I didnt blitz you. OFC you and everyone else who has seen rookie last season knows that blitzing you would have meant my death, so I didnt do it. Its just so easy.

Just like they need to remove or change GL Rollouts/ Sweeps, they need to change defense there for those situations. Like Hurries actually leading to bad throws. Otherwise blitzing is dead as its onl viable vs bad teams

Originally posted by Detroit Leos
Also, BSB has now run 65 different pass plays at least once this season. Forgive me if proper Gameplanning against a known incoming blitz spam results in me sticking to a handful of plays in a game.


Wel yeah, I see that. Its easy to beat rookie agent teams with it easily just like for me or any other top team. Im only talking about games that matter

I dont blame you. You saw and see it working so you do the same. Thats how this game works. So dont feel offended...Was just disappointed when I noticed it after seeing how you started the sseason^^ We all just wanna win so everyone can use the best plays!

Blitzing is very strong in rookie. I agree that hurries should effect throws maybe a little bit more but I only think that this is a pile on effect of running fewer passing plays. I like a diverse PB but blitzing in rookie limits what I can do against good teams offensively because it is so OP against 95% of the passing plays. So if a boost to hurried effects is made I would also like to be able to run other plays without having a guaranteed sack in rookie ball.

You act like I have not known what offensive plays have been effective over the past 4+ seasons. Haha. I am not copying anybody. Yes they are effective, yes I spammed 1 game against a known incoming defensive spam but it does not mean that spamming is what my offense is about... I didn't collect two S* TEs and 3 S* WRs to run the same 2-3 plays every game. I did it FOR diversity. Simma down nah!

Originally posted by Detroit Leos
Blitzing is very strong in rookie. I agree that hurries should effect throws maybe a little bit more but I only think that this is a pile on effect of running fewer passing plays. I like a diverse PB but blitzing in rookie limits what I can do against good teams offensively because it is so OP against 95% of the passing plays. So if a boost to hurried effects is made I would also like to be able to run other plays without having a guaranteed sack in rookie ball.

Well, what makes those play OP is how fast they relase the ball and they always get away with a hurry or nothing. So it should be penalized by a chance of bad throws just like blitzing is supposed to work. I dont really agree on your last comment. Just like passing the ball a few times prevents ppl from using zone plays vs the run, heavy blitz should force ppl to actually run the ball sometimes. There are many many plays who would abuse ZEB with some runs pretty good

But yes...some plays are horribly cded in terms of sack

Everything boils down to Gameplanning. I like realism but also like the option of running "pure" teams in a game environment as unrealistic as it is. If you know a specific play is being spammed by a defense in specific situations or whatever there should be plays that beat it either running or passing. I figured this was coming from Couch as he held Hawaii Bulls to 17 with it a few days ago so game planned my offense for it. I have been running balanced and pure passing offenses for the past 5-6 seasons or so and building my knowledge/network to get to the point and own my own team. Didn't expect owning my team to make such an enormous difference regarding excitement for games but it does. Anyway, just like an offense spamming a certain play a defense can be burned by it as well. I do not like the "spam" types of PB/tactics but sometimes Gameplanning may require it. With that said of course some known effective plays are going to fire more on any good offense. Do not knock the offense because it was game planned for dealing with a specific defensive look just as defenses are game planned.

then you have to live with beeing blitzed into oblivion imo. that attitude is OK, but it needs to have consequences

I am alright with being blitzed in to oblivion but knowingly walking my non-s* QB with no backup QB in to 15-25 sacks and a known uncompetitive day offensively would just be stupid! If I know a specific defensive play is coming at me on specific situations or a whole game I am going to modify my offense accordingly like any good OC would.

Bottom line... If you know what a defense is going to do against you then you should be able to make them pay for it if running the right plays. It is the same with DCs teeing off on offensive tendencies.

well yeah, we already closed that topic I thought. whatever

Well don't be disappointed with a single "spam" offensive Gameplan to combat a specific "spam" type defensive Gameplan. It is even worse when you consider that it is essentially ALL that you have done with the Cobras. If you are disappointed with a single BSB game of doing it take a good, long and hard look in the mirror.

Originally posted by Detroit Leos
Well don't be disappointed with a single "spam" offensive Gameplan to combat a specific "spam" type defensive Gameplan. It is even worse when you consider that it is essentially ALL that you have done with the Cobras. If you are disappointed with a single BSB game of doing it take a good, long and hard look in the mirror.

Again...seems like you didnt follow our conversation at all and now just trying to bitch?Haha, pathetic. I mean I even said "spam like last seaasons" as Cobras and Bombers were the first team to spam those plays constantly. And now you think that was a counter? Its stupid, just like much nowadays. NP man, go ahead^^ Look thru posts and also the chronology maybe you then understand what I mean. GL the rest of the way tho

So it is about you somehow trying to take credit for BSB success in a single game??? Once again... The game was game planned for offensively. We have not spammed every game or anything "like" the Cobras or BB. I have been running these plays for seasons now and my Gameplan for today has nothing to do with the Cobras or BB. It has to do with running successful plays against an all out blitzing defense.

OK...if you cant read then I stop writing, sorry. Jeesus

Originally posted by peeti
OK...if you cant read then I stop writing, sorry. Jeesus

Love our chats.

football has no rules