Originally posted by Mezirah
Technically trash talk is the best way to run defend as well with the nerf to leadership. You just bombard a QB's morale to zero then the run machine dies after a few tackles for loss, especially if you have some guys with showboat.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/119841
Queens City is winning this game until about 8 minutes in and 3 showboats then the offense melts without the leadership train. And they don't score after the 1st quarter despite running counters vs man base and cover 2 man under which is typically not a bad matchup. But without morale no team is doing anything special.
Imagine if the Generals were equipped enough to have TT mixed in to destroy a run team via attacking a QB who's only job is to keep morale high and handoff the ball? There is no reason NOT to have TT explosions on new teams.The Leadership nerf was made to Romo's team AFTER he had completed his builds.
That's important for everyone to understand. For 5 seasons of building, he had Leadership effecting his team. As a result, he's probably under-invested in Heart and possibly Toughness because he didn't need them while his team was building.
Now that his builds are done, he can't invest more in Heart, etc. to compensate for the Leadership nerf. Unless he spends FLEX on respecs.
But going forward teams won't have Leadership and thus they'll be monitoring the Energy/Morale of their OLine without the buff. Which will cause them to invest more in Heart, etc.
The game is dynamic. When you change one thing, there are ripple effects. Those ripples cause other changes.
In short, the dynamic action of the player base creating new teams/strategies each season is the balancing act. You're looking at Romo's team which is a static snapshot in time. It doesn't mean you're wrong; but it also doesn't mean you're right.
The game is unbalanced if there's no dynamic to counter TT. We know that Heart and Toughness do counter it.
The game balance question is: IF they CAN and IF they DO, is the cost of the counter reasonable given the cost of the action (TT).