User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pacific Pro League > Oceania Conference > McGruff's Matchup Machine - Week 5
Page:
 
McGruffHawk
offline
Link
 
Some very interesting and very important matchups across the spectrum in both conferences this week, starting with too "even" matchups as our games of the week. Many matchups with potential playoff significance, along with others fighting each other for relegations, especially in Zeta conference.

Games of the Week

Tonga (4-0) over West Scranton (3-1) - even
Brisbane Heat (4-0) over Vanuata (3-1) - even

**** Games
New Enland (3-1) -14.5 over Fiji (3-1)
Canberra (3-1) -7.5 over Perth (1-3)
East Coast (3-1) -9 over Newcastle (3-1)
Brisbane Bandits (2-2) -2.5 over Wagga Wagga (2-2)
Tongan (2-2) -2.5 over Nauru (3-1)

*** Games
Brantford (2-2) -27 over Emerald City (2-2)
Brisbane Gods (1-3) -5.5 over Co-op City (3-1)
FFLivewire (3-1) -23.5 over Big Island (1-3)

** Games
Auckland (1-3) -29.5 over Aussie (0-4)
Saipan (0-4) -9.5 over Great Barrier (1-3)

* Games
Green Bay (0-4) -81.5 over Dogdandy (0-4)
Rawle Tech (3-1) -94.5 over Westpac (0-4)
IC (4-0) -113.5 over Purdue (0-4)
FFLW (3-1) -45.5 over Jakarta (0-4)
 
TheKingOfVa
offline
Link
 
Great work!
 
Notor
offline
Link
 
Should be a great game with the Heat, we're tied 1-1 in our previous meetings so we'll have ourselves a tiebreaker here

We've had to rebuild a little bit since we last played, so this should be a big test for the new guys....and everyone else on the team as usual.
Last edited Aug 10, 2008 17:47:41
 
sxewesley
offline
Link
 
Really looking forward to it, we consider the Sharks our main rivals.
 
HOODjelly
offline
Link
 
Whoa....guess I better get to planning Here I thought we were buddies sharing the same rival (GLB BETA)

Good luck fellas! Should be a good game.
 
JoeOlson
offline
Link
 
Heh one of these days, all of us over at Perth will come out on the good side of these games.
 
ptriley
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by sxewesley
Really looking forward to it, we consider the Sharks our main rivals.



Same with some of us, and I still think you guys have a great team, with some very good players and GM's. Good luck ( but not to much )
 
GotMilk
offline
Link
 
We're better when we play you guys in playoff
 
tsimp93
offline
Link
 
Looking forward to this one us guys at Brisbane are buzzing about this!
 
bdnannac
offline
Link
 
Lots of good matchups this week.
 
Link
 
Again with the Fiji unlove. I'm not saying we will win... not even saying we should be favored against a team as good as New England... but two touchdowns AND the hook?
 
McGruffHawk
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JuniorMcSpiffy
Again with the Fiji unlove. I'm not saying we will win... not even saying we should be favored against a team as good as New England... but two touchdowns AND the hook?


I've got to find a measurable number that allows me to factor in intangibles like coaching and game play. You guys are successful, as far as I can tell, because you either 1) build better players, or 2) out game plan other teams or 3) both of the above.

Neither of those are factored into the machine's calculations.
 
McGruffHawk
offline
Link
 
And, you've also got to remember that in GLB land, 2 TD's is a close game.
 
Mobius
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by McGruffHawk


I've got to find a measurable number that allows me to factor in intangibles like coaching and game play. You guys are successful, as far as I can tell, because you either 1) build better players, or 2) out game plan other teams or 3) both of the above.

Neither of those are factored into the machine's calculations.


I would hope that it's #1 and #2, with a dash of #3, #3 being we have a rabid fan base and the best looking cheerleaders in the league

 
McGruffHawk
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mobius
Originally posted by McGruffHawk



I've got to find a measurable number that allows me to factor in intangibles like coaching and game play. You guys are successful, as far as I can tell, because you either 1) build better players, or 2) out game plan other teams or 3) both of the above.

Neither of those are factored into the machine's calculations.


I would hope that it's #1 and #2, with a dash of #3, #3 being we have a rabid fan base and the best looking cheerleaders in the league



http://cheerleading.about.com/od/malecheerleaders/Resources_for_Male_Cheerleadres.htm
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.