I've been intensely curious about how each of our league's teams will rate this preseason. Does anyone else wonder who's going to take it all this next year?
raiderdav
offline
offline
Originally posted by cmalouf
winnepeg falcons baby!
I have to agree with cmalouf on this one.
winnepeg falcons baby!
I have to agree with cmalouf on this one.
mickyj
offline
offline
I thienk you 2 are kidding yourselves.
It believe it will be between the 2 sides that played the East confreance final again. Montreal and Yukon
It believe it will be between the 2 sides that played the East confreance final again. Montreal and Yukon
raiderdav
offline
offline
Doubtful - have you looked at the Olympians roster lately? Looks like they were just waiting for the cap to go away.
raiderdav
offline
offline
... and hopefully the new sportsmanship deductions will kick in 
Not that I wouldn't do the same thing if I could...
Not that I wouldn't do the same thing if I could...JohnRowdy
offline
offline
Yeah, Well see how it works out when the Sportmanship penalties kick in. All their new players belong to 1 person lol
Lucius
offline
offline
I cannot complain, as we may well be the (second) worst offender, but does it make anyone else sad that the game forces everyone to upgrade to basically the same level, regardless of league?
I cannot say I can offer a solution, but there should be something to keep people in line and make it so A is actually worse than AA, etc.
We basically had to make our championship starting line-up backups, release our backups and sign all new starters and I wouldn't say we're the favorites. That's a bit depressing. I'd rather have kept my starting unit together, but that just isn't possible year-to-year if you want to compete.
I cannot say I can offer a solution, but there should be something to keep people in line and make it so A is actually worse than AA, etc.
We basically had to make our championship starting line-up backups, release our backups and sign all new starters and I wouldn't say we're the favorites. That's a bit depressing. I'd rather have kept my starting unit together, but that just isn't possible year-to-year if you want to compete.
Last edited Jul 28, 2008 10:53:37
mdkaden
offline
offline
Originally posted by SidVicious
Olympians roster is just plain not fair.
Will the payroll be too high? With the new rules of no negative?
Olympians roster is just plain not fair.
Will the payroll be too high? With the new rules of no negative?
JerryRice
offline
offline
Originally posted by Lucius
I cannot complain, as we may well be the (second) worst offender, but does it make anyone else sad that the game forces everyone to upgrade to basically the same level, regardless of league?
True that. The Silent Pwners have 5 of the starting 24 (including K/P) from last year's roster still starting. Not saying I don't like my team because I love it, but The Olympians are a bit ridiculous. It is quite sad we can't keep our team from last year if we want to compete. Just the way it is.
I cannot complain, as we may well be the (second) worst offender, but does it make anyone else sad that the game forces everyone to upgrade to basically the same level, regardless of league?
True that. The Silent Pwners have 5 of the starting 24 (including K/P) from last year's roster still starting. Not saying I don't like my team because I love it, but The Olympians are a bit ridiculous. It is quite sad we can't keep our team from last year if we want to compete. Just the way it is.
Mastodon
offline
offline
Originally posted by JerryRice
True that. The Silent Pwners have 5 of the starting 24 (including K/P) from last year's roster still starting. Not saying I don't like my team because I love it, but The Olympians are a bit ridiculous. It is quite sad we can't keep our team from last year if we want to compete. Just the way it is.
It's a shame to be sure. There is absolutely no sense of accomplishment one should get from beating teams that are half your level. It's like some major college football team thumping their chests after beating a middle school girls team. I'll not own a team in this sim until they address parity within a league.
GLB needs at least a couple of leagues where real restrictions are in place for boosting, level differences, etc., to prohibit the absurd mismatches that are all too common. Leagues where teams are close enough that scounting, strategy, tactics, and a little luck are the prime drivers of victory.
True that. The Silent Pwners have 5 of the starting 24 (including K/P) from last year's roster still starting. Not saying I don't like my team because I love it, but The Olympians are a bit ridiculous. It is quite sad we can't keep our team from last year if we want to compete. Just the way it is.
It's a shame to be sure. There is absolutely no sense of accomplishment one should get from beating teams that are half your level. It's like some major college football team thumping their chests after beating a middle school girls team. I'll not own a team in this sim until they address parity within a league.
GLB needs at least a couple of leagues where real restrictions are in place for boosting, level differences, etc., to prohibit the absurd mismatches that are all too common. Leagues where teams are close enough that scounting, strategy, tactics, and a little luck are the prime drivers of victory.
Last edited Jul 28, 2008 13:22:35
raiderdav
offline
offline
I'm really surprised there wasn't a second level cap of like 19 or something this season. Oh well - we'll be rid of 2 teams and they can get shelled in AA next season.
Forseth89
offline
offline
For this season the lvl is less important since the Defense and offense Al is here.
raiderdav
offline
offline
Originally posted by Forseth89
For this season the lvl is less important since the Defense and offense Al is here.
I'm not buying that for a second.
For this season the lvl is less important since the Defense and offense Al is here.
I'm not buying that for a second.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
