Please send your votes. I haven't received any votes to make a list to vote from.
MattMan Firespot
offline
offline
Its a lot of work to do, I dont think alot of people want to spend the necessary time it owuld take to make a probowl list of players when it doesnt matter and boils down to a popularity contest. Alot of owners and GMs are busy with the playoffs.
canes30
offline
offline
Originally posted by MattMan Firespot
Its a lot of work to do, I dont think alot of people want to spend the necessary time it owuld take to make a probowl list of players when it doesnt matter and boils down to a popularity contest. Alot of owners and GMs are busy with the playoffs.
Its a lot of work to do, I dont think alot of people want to spend the necessary time it owuld take to make a probowl list of players when it doesnt matter and boils down to a popularity contest. Alot of owners and GMs are busy with the playoffs.
morid
offline
offline
I don't have time to rate players. I would not pick the leaders most of the time. I would have to watch film and look at records and do spreadsheets! I just cant do it right now.
titanicwin
offline
offline
In the future (not this season) the best thing would be for each GM/owner (one per team) to nominate up to two players from each side of the ball from their team that they truly feel are worthy of consideration and to compile a list that way. That way, there is a list of 64 players (at most) on both sides of the ball. That is a lot, but not completely overwhelming. Naturally, some teams would not participate and others would perhaps not feel that anyone (or perhaps one or two) were up to consideration. That might leave only 40 players to pick from on both sides of the ball. Not a perfect system, but it makes it far less work for everyone.
For kicking and punting, I guess just go with the highest stats.
For kicking and punting, I guess just go with the highest stats.
morid
offline
offline
Originally posted by Albert Harrison
For kicking and punting, I guess just go with the highest stats.
Stats as in points? or stats as in who pined the other team the most?
For kicking and punting, I guess just go with the highest stats.
Stats as in points? or stats as in who pined the other team the most?
canes30
offline
offline
Come on Morid 
just because you have a punter. I'll give it to you although our punter may be mad.
just because you have a punter. I'll give it to you although our punter may be mad.Chase Herman
offline
offline
Originally posted by Albert Harrison
In the future (not this season) the best thing would be for each GM/owner (one per team) to nominate up to two players from each side of the ball from their team that they truly feel are worthy of consideration and to compile a list that way. That way, there is a list of 64 players (at most) on both sides of the ball. That is a lot, but not completely overwhelming. Naturally, some teams would not participate and others would perhaps not feel that anyone (or perhaps one or two) were up to consideration. That might leave only 40 players to pick from on both sides of the ball. Not a perfect system, but it makes it far less work for everyone.
For kicking and punting, I guess just go with the highest stats.
In the future (not this season) the best thing would be for each GM/owner (one per team) to nominate up to two players from each side of the ball from their team that they truly feel are worthy of consideration and to compile a list that way. That way, there is a list of 64 players (at most) on both sides of the ball. That is a lot, but not completely overwhelming. Naturally, some teams would not participate and others would perhaps not feel that anyone (or perhaps one or two) were up to consideration. That might leave only 40 players to pick from on both sides of the ball. Not a perfect system, but it makes it far less work for everyone.
For kicking and punting, I guess just go with the highest stats.
kurieg
offline
offline
Originally posted by canes30
Come on Morid just because you have a punter. I'll give it to you although our punter may be mad.
That'd be really nice since Morid's punter is not in this league
Come on Morid
just because you have a punter. I'll give it to you although our punter may be mad.That'd be really nice since Morid's punter is not in this league
MattMan Firespot
offline
offline
Originally posted by Chase Herman
Originally posted by Albert Harrison
In the future (not this season) the best thing would be for each GM/owner (one per team) to nominate up to two players from each side of the ball from their team that they truly feel are worthy of consideration and to compile a list that way. That way, there is a list of 64 players (at most) on both sides of the ball. That is a lot, but not completely overwhelming. Naturally, some teams would not participate and others would perhaps not feel that anyone (or perhaps one or two) were up to consideration. That might leave only 40 players to pick from on both sides of the ball. Not a perfect system, but it makes it far less work for everyone.
For kicking and punting, I guess just go with the highest stats.
+2
Originally posted by Albert Harrison
In the future (not this season) the best thing would be for each GM/owner (one per team) to nominate up to two players from each side of the ball from their team that they truly feel are worthy of consideration and to compile a list that way. That way, there is a list of 64 players (at most) on both sides of the ball. That is a lot, but not completely overwhelming. Naturally, some teams would not participate and others would perhaps not feel that anyone (or perhaps one or two) were up to consideration. That might leave only 40 players to pick from on both sides of the ball. Not a perfect system, but it makes it far less work for everyone.
For kicking and punting, I guess just go with the highest stats.
+2
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
