Warrior General Games

https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/807077/225151

My late game behind tactics are almost 100% pass, and the punt at the end is just fantastic guys.


Seriously, fix this, it’s getting old to watch your team throw away a game because they feel like it.

Every time this happens in a ranked game it is completely unacceptable. I literally had 0% chance of winning at the end due to this, my team wasn’t even aware they were losing or behind apparently. And you guys don’t even bother to respond to these post anymore, it’s just a fun little quirky bug you don’t care to even try to fix despite it being one of the most game breaking.

Originally posted by Raid
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/807077/225151

My late game behind tactics are almost 100% pass, and the punt at the end is just fantastic guys.


Seriously, fix this, it’s getting old as fuck to watch your team throw away a game because they feel like it.

I hear ya man. I hope they concentrate on fixing tactics this season. Biggest part of the game that needs improvement.

What are your tactics set for the following?

Within 3 Points, Near FG Range, 5min left

and

Trailing 3min Offense

When to punt late should definitely be in tactics

Logic could be you’re team has enough time to make the stop. That could be the flaw

Originally posted by Raid
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/807077/225151

My late game behind tactics are almost 100% pass, and the punt at the end is just fantastic guys.
I'd guess that you switched to running because your Tactics say to do that in FG range. But, that third down 3 yard loss put you out of FG range. Hence the punt.

HOWEVER, there's no way you should be punting in that situation. That doesn't make sense.

Originally posted by vipermaw82
Logic could be you’re team has enough time to make the stop. That could be the flaw
Not with 39 seconds left. And, teams go for it on 4th downs, late in the game with more time than that on the clock.

Yeah, that's very frustrating.

Originally posted by Ace of Spades 7

Not with 39 seconds left. And, teams go for it on 4th downs, late in the game with more time than that on the clock.

Yeah, that's very frustrating.

True, trying to find that flaw in the code would be nuts

Originally posted by vipermaw82
True, trying to find that flaw in the code would be nuts

It shouldn’t be that hard to find. Code probably doesn’t do a check on timeouts.

Originally posted by Cybertron
It shouldn’t be that hard to find. Code probably doesn’t do a check on timeouts.

Out of curiosity have you coded before, genera question not a criticizing moment. If it was a simple check they probably would have found it a long time ago. But it would appear to be a random thing. Finding the right line of the the code, finding out if you missed one character or punctuation in the code which causes the error out, may not even show up as an error… unlimited possibilities

Originally posted by vipermaw82
Out of curiosity have you coded before, genera question not a criticizing moment. If it was a simple check they probably would have found it a long time ago. But it would appear to be a random thing. Finding the right line of the the code, finding out if you missed one character or punctuation in the code which causes the error out, may not even show up as an error… unlimited possibilities

Yes...I am a senior developer/architect and have been in software for 25 years. I write code every day...lol

You don't "miss a character or punctuation" in code. It would not compile if there is a syntax error. I do not know how this code is architected or what it is written in so I am just guessing. But I would assume, several checks are made when making a decision to punt or go for it. And those checks should be in the code (or possibly a configuration file that is read by the code) that make these decisions. It could be a 50 line nested if statement or some kind of recursive method....heck if I know. They could put some log statements in the code to help pinpoint where the issue is though. I don't know how much trouble shooting they have done as the developers are not very transparent with us about bug fixes.

Originally posted by Cybertron
Yes...I am a senior developer/architect and have been in software for 25 years. I write code every day...lol

You don't "miss a character or punctuation" in code. It would not compile if there is a syntax error. I do not know how this code is architected or what it is written in so I am just guessing. But I would assume, several checks are made when making a decision to punt or go for it. And those checks should be in the code (or possibly a configuration file that is read by the code) that make these decisions. It could be a 50 line nested if statement or some kind of recursive method....heck if I know. They could put some log statements in the code to help pinpoint where the issue is though. I don't know how much trouble shooting they have done as the developers are not very transparent with us about bug fixes.

See now I eat my words lol.

Originally posted by Cybertron
Yes...I am a senior developer/architect and have been in software for 25 years. I write code every day...lol

You don't "miss a character or punctuation" in code. It would not compile if there is a syntax error. I do not know how this code is architected or what it is written in so I am just guessing. But I would assume, several checks are made when making a decision to punt or go for it. And those checks should be in the code (or possibly a configuration file that is read by the code) that make these decisions. It could be a 50 line nested if statement or some kind of recursive method....heck if I know. They could put some log statements in the code to help pinpoint where the issue is though. I don't know how much trouble shooting they have done as the developers are not very transparent with us about bug fixes.

Too bad you're an Empire fan.



"May the Force be with you."

Originally posted by Xars
Too bad you're an Empire fan.



"May the Force be with you."

Emperor Palpatine foresaw a great invasion of the known galaxy by a force that was strong enough to possibly destroy them all unless he could unite the galaxy as one to fight them off. He utilized his position to try to create such a united force, but was ultimately defeated by his hatred of the Jedi Order.

While in the past Jedi and Sith had mostly existed without direct conflict, Palpatine was driven by a mistrust of the Jedi, and was determined to wipe them out rather than try to cooperate with them and the parts of the galaxy that might side with them. He feared, especially with his visions of destruction and doom in the future, that Jedi pacifism might lead to parts of the galaxy unwilling to participate in the defense of other systems far away from them, leading to massive death totals and a possible defeat.

Palpatine, with these thoughts in mind, set about his plans to consolidate power in the republic, incentivize systems and powers to join the republic, and eventually unite the galaxy as one force under Imperial rule. He failed, and ultimately the universe would be doomed to be decimated by the Yuuzhan Vong who exterminated 300 trillion lives and nearly wiped out the entirety of the new republic.

Some things of note: The Empire banned slavery, and brought about prosperity on many worlds that had toiled before in the outer areas of the galaxy. The majority of the backing for the rebellion came from ultra-rich and royal families who feared losing their positions of power within the new Empire, a large portion representing systems and powers that relied on slavery for their continued austerity.