Warrior General Games

You know how 1 player moves before the ball has been hiked. I think having man in action plays would create another crazy depth to this game

There are plenty, they are all just trash because they involve safeties blitzing, not LBs. Look for plays w/ the word tiger in the name.

https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/images/tactics/defense_plays/548.jpg
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/images/tactics/defense_plays/462.jpg
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/images/tactics/defense_plays/466.jpg
etc.

Any offensive plays ?
Also they really should add more then that plus have LB blisters at you said

Originally posted by o The Boss x
There are plenty, they are all just trash because they involve safeties blitzing, not LBs. Look for plays w/ the word tiger in the name.

https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/images/tactics/defense_plays/548.jpg
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/images/tactics/defense_plays/462.jpg
https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/images/tactics/defense_plays/466.jpg
etc.

Or are they trash because nobody builds safeties for blitzing?

Originally posted by Corndog
Or are they trash because nobody builds safeties for blitzing?

i had a SS built for blitzing and it was pretty great tbh i really want a tunnel vision line crasher but i dont know what skills make line crasher good

ended up with tunnel vision monster hit

Originally posted by Corndog
Or are they trash because nobody builds safeties for blitzing?

No they're trash because they involve safeties blitzing.

Both safeties are too far away from the line to cause a legitimate sack chance on the QB and potentially move a player (who would always be in a position to make a play) out of position.

If you could tag/maneuver depth charts based on plays like you could in GLB1 then yeah it could be a cool risky play to stop the run but that's about it. Right now, safeties need to excel in a lot of things (specifically the SS, which would likely be the more viable tiger blitzer since he's strong side). That's part of what makes cover 3 tiger so great, because so few plays in 3-4 are viable you can just set your 3-4 depth chart how you want and not run any other 3-4 plays. But yeah, the LB being at the LOS at the snap of the ball is the icing on the cake.

Safety blitzes are actually pretty dope, if your scheme can’t properly use them then that has nothing to do with the overall usefulness of the play

Originally posted by ThePh33P
i had a SS built for blitzing and it was pretty great tbh

Yeah I remember that. The legendary "Garbage Man"