Warrior General Games

New Offensive set: I, Pro, Strong, & Weak WR Twins formation (so slot receivers can get some more use), and a Pistol Weak formation

46 Defense (similar to 4-3 or a 4-4 but with SS up in box, the old Bear's defense)

3-5-3 Defense (the double SS's D)

Fix screens.

https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5297806


https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/5298349


https://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum/thread/52984



can we get a Deflection SA that works both for DB and DT/DE.

Can WR/CB/SS/FS be able to use the Beatdown SA?

i actually love the 3-3-5 defense. 3 dline, 3 lbers, and 5 dbs. you can do a lot with that defense in real situations. on here it would probably be ass. there is also the 4-2-5 is nice

Originally posted by dredgar
i actually love the 3-3-5 defense. 3 dline, 3 lbers, and 5 dbs. you can do a lot with that defense in real situations. on here it would probably be ass. there is also the 4-2-5 is nice

I don't know, have you tried it? It's been in the game since launch.

Originally posted by Corndog
I don't know, have you tried it? It's been in the game since launch.

doesn't work well against all situations. its just part of it for 3-3-5. but the 3-5-3 or 4-2-5, is completely different

Maybe it's my QB, but I don't recall Quick Hitter firing much all season (maybe On The Run over rides it on text showing up?)...anyone else see it fire consistently?

Also, how about dividing up defense for 2TE sets (single HB and single WR) like you all did for Trips in 3 & 4 WR sets?

Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
Also, how about dividing up defense for 2TE sets (single HB and single WR) like you all did for Trips in 3 & 4 WR sets?

That would make more sense for the defense but could start to make the game more not the ease they hoped for

Originally posted by dredgar
That would make more sense for the defense but could start to make the game more not the ease they hoped for

its optional so it doesn't affect you unless you want it too, as that the trips stuff is that way already and didn't hurt anything

Originally posted by dredgar
That would make more sense for the defense but could start to make the game more not the ease they hoped for

Probably make it easier not trying to find one play to stop two totally different formations. You would also not have to change your playbook so often game to game.

How about the option on depth charts on offense to do it by formation like on defense instead of just all and goalline

Originally posted by cjhwolf
How about the option on depth charts on offense to do it by formation like on defense instead of just all and goalline

This would be great.

Running plays for WR position

Originally posted by cjhwolf
How about the option on depth charts on offense to do it by formation like on defense instead of just all and goalline

No