Warrior General Games

What you guys think about this inclusion? Could be too op for pass? And i'm not talking about Goal line, SB Jumbo uses 1 WR instead of a FB.

Originally posted by McLovinCowboys
What you guys think about this inclusion? Could be too op for pass? And i'm not talking about Goal line, SB Jumbo uses 1 WR instead of a FB.

So where would you put the 11th guy? Big I already has 2 TE and 1 WR plus FB. Are you wanting 3 TE, 1 WR?

Just asking so I'm clear. 3 TE would force you to either carry a 3rd TE or use the FB as a TE. I. This case they could just add plays to big I that line the FB up on the edge instead maybe instead of having a whole new formation?

I see in the title you mean 3rd TE. Missed that

Yep, Falcons is using some 3 TE sets on the NFL, and its an old unusual formation. http://i.imgur.com/nEBoSUL.png

Originally posted by McLovinCowboys
Yep, Falcons is using some 3 TE sets on the NFL, and its an old unusual formation. http://i.imgur.com/nEBoSUL.png

Raiders use it from time to time as well. They also use an unbalanced line where an OT is at TE and a TE is lined up like an OT. Both are mostly run formations. Haven't seen what Atl does out of it though

Might be a bit op running strong side.

Originally posted by bhall43
Might be a bit op running strong side.

Yeah, but they could make it like goalline formation, no real outside run, just offtackle, but i want it for passes.