Warrior General Games

Air Raid has 23 different agents controlling players on our roster. We're currently the #1 team in the game. We've got more agents on the roster today than we started with. We've replaced agents that've gone inactive and recruited from the marketplace or PLFT forum every single season except this last one. Roughly half the roster experienced turnover on the way to Veteran.

I know early on, many folks were concerned about rosters built by a single agent, or a few agents. You can have fun and success in GLB2 putting together a team with a bunch of people involved.

I like teams with multiple agents. Any chance for more discussion in the forums is a good thing. I like interacting with other agents though. Some people prefer to stay to themselves or just want full control of every build. There are many ways to skin the cat though. A dedicated owner and agents willing to build towards performing their respective roles well should be successful.

I haven't seen much "single agent teams are the devil" posting lately, thankfully.

In the current Journeyman tier, I've actually found that (in general) the single agent teams tend to be significantly weaker than multi agents. Ninja's team is an exception (and there may be a few others good ones, too lazy to go checking the top 10 right now), but in my regular scouting as I go through the rest of the tier, most single agent teams are legitimately bad teams. Not "good but flawed", not "well, that'll be a tough win". A lot of them are "I'll run my base AI, should win by 30".

I am on a few many agent teams and single agent teams. For me I don't want the responsiblity of going dark or screwing things up so I limit the amount of teams I run with many agents. I will tell you single agent teams are a PITA when it comes time to adding SP!

Single Agent still have the edge, as Long as They actually know the game

Originally posted by pottsman
I haven't seen much "single agent teams are the devil" posting lately, thankfully.

In the current Journeyman tier, I've actually found that (in general) the single agent teams tend to be significantly weaker than multi agents. Ninja's team is an exception (and there may be a few others good ones, too lazy to go checking the top 10 right now), but in my regular scouting as I go through the rest of the tier, most single agent teams are legitimately bad teams. Not "good but flawed", not "well, that'll be a tough win". A lot of them are "I'll run my base AI, should win by 30".

Seasoned has a ton of very good single agent teams.

Originally posted by pottsman
I haven't seen much "single agent teams are the devil" posting lately, thankfully.

In the current Journeyman tier, I've actually found that (in general) the single agent teams tend to be significantly weaker than multi agents. Ninja's team is an exception (and there may be a few others good ones, too lazy to go checking the top 10 right now), but in my regular scouting as I go through the rest of the tier, most single agent teams are legitimately bad teams. Not "good but flawed", not "well, that'll be a tough win". A lot of them are "I'll run my base AI, should win by 30".
unless the single agent knows what they are doing

Originally posted by peeti
Single Agent still have the edge, as Long as They actually know the game

this

To an extent. Superstars can kind of even out the argument between single and multi agent teams

Originally posted by jfbueno
To an extent. Superstars can kind of even out the argument between single and multi agent teams

This...I am restricted to only 3 S*s. The best team would be a 2 agent team with 6 S*s. One agent runs the offense and one runs the defrnse.

Originally posted by Galithor
Air Raid has 23 different agents controlling players on our roster. We're currently the #1 team in the game. We've got more agents on the roster today than we started with. We've replaced agents that've gone inactive and recruited from the marketplace or PLFT forum every single season except this last one. Roughly half the roster experienced turnover on the way to Veteran.

I know early on, many folks were concerned about rosters built by a single agent, or a few agents. You can have fun and success in GLB2 putting together a team with a bunch of people involved.

You've played 2 teams this season with at least as many SSs as you have, you went 1-1.

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
This...I am restricted to only 3 S*s. The best team would be a 2 agent team with 6 S*s. One agent runs the offense and one runs the defrnse.

ya probably unless that two agent team some one doesn't have the S*s


for what i would want to do with a team i would need at 3 different agents. taking i want 3 Tier S*s

so i think there is two way to do it

1 run o 1 run d and have 3 of each on each side

2. 1 guy makes the majority of the roster minus some S* slots.

Originally posted by peeti
Single Agent still have the edge, as Long as They actually know the game

Must be why mine sucks lol

Originally posted by jfbueno
To an extent. Superstars can kind of even out the argument between single and multi agent teams

Easily

i have found both ways. some one agent teams i see and go demolish them for fun. and some i see and go well damn time to really gameplan

also a great team would be say get 4 or 5 agents max and get your stars that way fill the team each prson makes 6-7 players so you know the roster is made of quality agents and can all run the team as on realy.