Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > can i be #1 pls
mrm708
offline
offline
It factors in the quality of teams you are putting those stats up against. So, no you can't sorry.
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by E-A-G-L-E-S
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/hof?season=6&type=off_data&position=WR&league_id=0&tier=All
i got way more stuff

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/hof?season=6&type=off_data&position=WR&league_id=0&tier=All
i got way more stuff

peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by mrm708
It factors in the quality of teams you are putting those stats up against. So, no you can't sorry.
You know this is bullshit man...The reason is that he is one season behind, thus playing "lower ranked" teams...In terms of competition, he didnt play any real weaker than the no. 1
It factors in the quality of teams you are putting those stats up against. So, no you can't sorry.
You know this is bullshit man...The reason is that he is one season behind, thus playing "lower ranked" teams...In terms of competition, he didnt play any real weaker than the no. 1
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
You know this is bullshit man...The reason is that he is one season behind, thus playing "lower ranked" teams...In terms of competition, he didnt play any real weaker than the no. 1
You realize you can just sort by tier right?
You know this is bullshit man...The reason is that he is one season behind, thus playing "lower ranked" teams...In terms of competition, he didnt play any real weaker than the no. 1
You realize you can just sort by tier right?
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
You realize you can just sort by tier right?
lol, ofc?
Can you please tell me, why I had to answer to such a dumbshit post? I never said the system is flawed, just explained why he is behind and that mrm's post was bull
You realize you can just sort by tier right?
lol, ofc?
Can you please tell me, why I had to answer to such a dumbshit post? I never said the system is flawed, just explained why he is behind and that mrm's post was bull
mrm708
offline
offline
Doesnt make it bullshit. i dont think my LB deserves to be #1 but if you just look at the numbers you might think so.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/hof?season=6&type=def_data&position=All&league_id=0&tier=All
#1 HOF should be the best veteran players except in very rare situations.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/hof?season=6&type=def_data&position=All&league_id=0&tier=All
#1 HOF should be the best veteran players except in very rare situations.
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Qq much?
lol...I just won vs the Virgins, so no^^ Just forgot how stupid the community was
Originally posted by mrm708
Doesnt make it bullshit. i dont think my LB deserves to be #1 but if you just look at the numbers you might think so.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/hof?season=6&type=def_data&position=All&league_id=0&tier=All
#1 HOF should be the best veteran players except in very rare situations.
I agree...BUT, that again doesnt match ur "quality" post in my eyes
Qq much?
lol...I just won vs the Virgins, so no^^ Just forgot how stupid the community was
Originally posted by mrm708
Doesnt make it bullshit. i dont think my LB deserves to be #1 but if you just look at the numbers you might think so.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/hof?season=6&type=def_data&position=All&league_id=0&tier=All
#1 HOF should be the best veteran players except in very rare situations.
I agree...BUT, that again doesnt match ur "quality" post in my eyes
E-A-G-L-E-S
offline
offline
i mean im kinda half kidding but on the real im gonna finish the year with like 1000 more yards and 10 more TDs. cmon now cmooooooonnn...the dude has more yac than receiving yards what is that
mrm708
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
I agree...BUT, that again doesnt match ur "quality" post in my eyes
By quality i just meant ladder rank. i understand the top lower tiered are in a way better "quality" than say the #30 vet team.
I agree...BUT, that again doesnt match ur "quality" post in my eyes
By quality i just meant ladder rank. i understand the top lower tiered are in a way better "quality" than say the #30 vet team.
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by mrm708
By quality i just meant ladder rank. i understand the top lower tiered are in a way better "quality" than say the #30 vet team.
actually not and you are just trying to argue around your post
By quality i just meant ladder rank. i understand the top lower tiered are in a way better "quality" than say the #30 vet team.
actually not and you are just trying to argue around your post
pottsman
offline
offline
Is this the thread where I get to complain about http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/59934 being ranked behind http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/59643 on http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/hof?season=6&type=off_data&position=FB&league_id=0&tier=All ?
Cool. Because Celes is better, damnit.
Cool. Because Celes is better, damnit.
USC_Trojans
offline
offline
Originally posted by E-A-G-L-E-S
i mean im kinda half kidding but on the real im gonna finish the year with like 1000 more yards and 10 more TDs. cmon now cmooooooonnn...the dude has more yac than receiving yards what is that
i feel your pain. bo jackson would be the best hb in pro if it wasnt for hawaii and their super stars but sad i have to just sit and watch them dominate it while i die a little inside every season.
i mean im kinda half kidding but on the real im gonna finish the year with like 1000 more yards and 10 more TDs. cmon now cmooooooonnn...the dude has more yac than receiving yards what is that
i feel your pain. bo jackson would be the best hb in pro if it wasnt for hawaii and their super stars but sad i have to just sit and watch them dominate it while i die a little inside every season.
Edited by USC_Trojans on Oct 9, 2014 14:53:17
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.





























