Is there no way to own 2 teams? I see some teams that are not rookie teams that are CPU. Is there any way to buy those teams and reset them to rookie?
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Game Help > Owning 2 teams?
HayRow
offline
offline
Originally posted by sonto
Is there no way to own 2 teams? I see some teams that are not rookie teams that are CPU. Is there any way to buy those teams and reset them to rookie?
send a message to support, it's the only way
Is there no way to own 2 teams? I see some teams that are not rookie teams that are CPU. Is there any way to buy those teams and reset them to rookie?
send a message to support, it's the only way
Couchduck
offline
offline
Basically the only way I've seen people be able to own 2 teams, is to be a GM on a team when the owner goes inactive. They usually grant ownership of the team to the GM from there. Not sure if they will just let you take over a team. As Hayrow mentioned, just message support and they may be able to help you out.
Aeir
offline
offline
I've always felt letting people own more than one team (only different tiers perhaps?) would make it easier for players to find human controlled teams.
Originally posted by Aeir
I've always felt letting people own more than one team (only different tiers perhaps?) would make it easier for players to find human controlled teams.
It would also make recruiting more difficult, which is already one of if not the biggest barriers to team ownership and competitiveness.
Being on an uncompetitive, human owned team that's filled with CPU players isn't going to be a much better experience than being on a CPU owned team that's mostly filled with human players.
I've always felt letting people own more than one team (only different tiers perhaps?) would make it easier for players to find human controlled teams.
It would also make recruiting more difficult, which is already one of if not the biggest barriers to team ownership and competitiveness.
Being on an uncompetitive, human owned team that's filled with CPU players isn't going to be a much better experience than being on a CPU owned team that's mostly filled with human players.
Edited by Corndog on Sep 18, 2014 21:28:13
Edited by Corndog on Sep 18, 2014 21:27:55
Stixx
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
It would also make recruiting more difficult, which is already one of if not the biggest barriers to team ownership and competitiveness.
Being on an uncompetitive, human owned team that's filled with CPU players isn't going to be a much better experience than being on a CPU owned team that's mostly filled with human players.
Do you really think that someone who already owns a half CPU team will buy another team? I understand what you are saying but it doesn't really make sense.
The marketplace seems to be filled with players looking for a team. Most of the builds on there aren't that great but a team with half cpu players should use anyone they can get.
It would also make recruiting more difficult, which is already one of if not the biggest barriers to team ownership and competitiveness.
Being on an uncompetitive, human owned team that's filled with CPU players isn't going to be a much better experience than being on a CPU owned team that's mostly filled with human players.
Do you really think that someone who already owns a half CPU team will buy another team? I understand what you are saying but it doesn't really make sense.
The marketplace seems to be filled with players looking for a team. Most of the builds on there aren't that great but a team with half cpu players should use anyone they can get.
Edited by Stixx on Sep 18, 2014 22:16:46
Edited by Stixx on Sep 18, 2014 22:15:46
Edited by Stixx on Sep 18, 2014 22:14:07
Rob.
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
It would also make recruiting more difficult, which is already one of if not the biggest barriers to team ownership and competitiveness.
Being on an uncompetitive, human owned team that's filled with CPU players isn't going to be a much better experience than being on a CPU owned team that's mostly filled with human players.
The majority of people who actually want a 2nd team are going to be the type of people who have no problem recruiting.
It would also make recruiting more difficult, which is already one of if not the biggest barriers to team ownership and competitiveness.
Being on an uncompetitive, human owned team that's filled with CPU players isn't going to be a much better experience than being on a CPU owned team that's mostly filled with human players.
The majority of people who actually want a 2nd team are going to be the type of people who have no problem recruiting.
chronicbomb
offline
offline
people like me who have friends that i can ask and get to make dots because i have been going sesnse day one and i know what people want
Originally posted by rob4121983
The majority of people who actually want a 2nd team are going to be the type of people who have no problem recruiting.
Oh, yeah no doubt. But then people who aren't having much success recruiting are going to have an even more difficult time recruiting.
We tried the "let anyone own as many teams as they want" thing with GLB Classic, and it resulted in most teams being unable to come anywhere close to filling their rosters and the majority of teams not being remotely competitive.
I mean, I've been giving CPU teams in human leagues to users upon request, but we already have a case study of flooding the market with teams.
The majority of people who actually want a 2nd team are going to be the type of people who have no problem recruiting.
Oh, yeah no doubt. But then people who aren't having much success recruiting are going to have an even more difficult time recruiting.
We tried the "let anyone own as many teams as they want" thing with GLB Classic, and it resulted in most teams being unable to come anywhere close to filling their rosters and the majority of teams not being remotely competitive.
I mean, I've been giving CPU teams in human leagues to users upon request, but we already have a case study of flooding the market with teams.
Edited by Corndog on Sep 19, 2014 19:26:35
Aeir
offline
offline
Cleaning the inactive players in the marketplace would help recruiting, wouldn't it? I know I've looked for players there and had to send out 6,7,8+ contracts before I find one that's active.
william78
offline
offline
Originally posted by Aeir
Cleaning the inactive players in the marketplace would help recruiting, wouldn't it? I know I've looked for players there and had to send out 6,7,8+ contracts before I find one that's active.
Yeah that would be helpful.
Cleaning the inactive players in the marketplace would help recruiting, wouldn't it? I know I've looked for players there and had to send out 6,7,8+ contracts before I find one that's active.
Yeah that would be helpful.
Originally posted by Aeir
Cleaning the inactive players in the marketplace would help recruiting, wouldn't it? I know I've looked for players there and had to send out 6,7,8+ contracts before I find one that's active.
Big +1
7 day expiration anyone?
Cleaning the inactive players in the marketplace would help recruiting, wouldn't it? I know I've looked for players there and had to send out 6,7,8+ contracts before I find one that's active.
Big +1
7 day expiration anyone?
Xars
offline
offline
Originally posted by william78
Yeah that would be helpful.
Or just have the right column "Online" dot work like it does on the roster page, where it would change color if someone is inactive and if you hover over it with the mouse, you can see when they were last active.
Finally, being able to sort on that column so that active agents players went to the top, would be a huge benefit.
Yeah that would be helpful.
Or just have the right column "Online" dot work like it does on the roster page, where it would change color if someone is inactive and if you hover over it with the mouse, you can see when they were last active.
Finally, being able to sort on that column so that active agents players went to the top, would be a huge benefit.
mrm708
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xars
Or just have the right column "Online" dot work like it does on the roster page, where it would change color if someone is inactive and if you hover over it with the mouse, you can see when they were last active.
That would be sweet.
Or just have the right column "Online" dot work like it does on the roster page, where it would change color if someone is inactive and if you hover over it with the mouse, you can see when they were last active.
That would be sweet.
sonto
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
It would also make recruiting more difficult, which is already one of if not the biggest barriers to team ownership and competitiveness.
Being on an uncompetitive, human owned team that's filled with CPU players isn't going to be a much better experience than being on a CPU owned team that's mostly filled with human players.
I was going to use the other team as my farm. Get the players ready for when my other dot's have to be retired. No biggie. Just wondering.
It would also make recruiting more difficult, which is already one of if not the biggest barriers to team ownership and competitiveness.
Being on an uncompetitive, human owned team that's filled with CPU players isn't going to be a much better experience than being on a CPU owned team that's mostly filled with human players.
I was going to use the other team as my farm. Get the players ready for when my other dot's have to be retired. No biggie. Just wondering.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
