C'mon bortblade.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Last day of ladder not being 1v2, 3v4, 5v6, 7v8 etc. etc. etc. is super lol
bhall43
offline
offline
While I agree it really doesn't get more interesting.
Mem and qcbc have went at it all season and para needs qcbc to lose to take the top spot.
Tampa bay and doinitin is certainly a toss up match of 2 of the most well balanced teams in glb2 with solid defenses.
Sf and jersey could be playing for 1 still. Unsure how far jersey is back but a win over sf might just be enough if both dd and qcbc also lose.
Mem and qcbc have went at it all season and para needs qcbc to lose to take the top spot.
Tampa bay and doinitin is certainly a toss up match of 2 of the most well balanced teams in glb2 with solid defenses.
Sf and jersey could be playing for 1 still. Unsure how far jersey is back but a win over sf might just be enough if both dd and qcbc also lose.
If you were going to do something like this -- why not make it a playoff style bracket - where there could be re-matches.
There are 16 ladder games per year. Ladder games 1-13 are scheduled per new corndog rules (rookie vs rookie and soph vs soph - but everyone else just plays someone within 10).
Ladder 14: 1 vs 8 / 2 vs 7 / 3 vs 6 / 4 vs 5 (rest matched up randomly by normal rules)
ELO adjustments made as per usual
Ladder 15: 1 vs 4 / 2 vs 3 (rest matched up randomly by normal rules)
ELO adjustments made as per usual
Ladder 16: 1 vs 2 / 3 vs 4 (rest matched up randomly)
Take the random out of the final weeks. Current sophomore is a great example of how the late ladder randomness gets silly (even though it shouldn't matter) - #1 Soph team plays a Journeyman team in the final ladder match of the season. If I didn't have a 10 spot lead..it would SUCK!
There are 16 ladder games per year. Ladder games 1-13 are scheduled per new corndog rules (rookie vs rookie and soph vs soph - but everyone else just plays someone within 10).
Ladder 14: 1 vs 8 / 2 vs 7 / 3 vs 6 / 4 vs 5 (rest matched up randomly by normal rules)
ELO adjustments made as per usual
Ladder 15: 1 vs 4 / 2 vs 3 (rest matched up randomly by normal rules)
ELO adjustments made as per usual
Ladder 16: 1 vs 2 / 3 vs 4 (rest matched up randomly)
Take the random out of the final weeks. Current sophomore is a great example of how the late ladder randomness gets silly (even though it shouldn't matter) - #1 Soph team plays a Journeyman team in the final ladder match of the season. If I didn't have a 10 spot lead..it would SUCK!
Edited by TxSteve on Jun 30, 2014 08:39:31
Parab00n
offline
offline
I think at this point only QC, DD, and SF have a shot at #1.
QC - Should only need to win vs MEM(#9)
DD - Needs to win vs Tampa(#5)and hope for a QC loss. Could potentially jump QC if the gap is close with a win over a stronger opponent.
SF - Needs both DD and QC to lose, they play the weakest opponent rank wise in Dakota(#11).
QC - Should only need to win vs MEM(#9)
DD - Needs to win vs Tampa(#5)and hope for a QC loss. Could potentially jump QC if the gap is close with a win over a stronger opponent.
SF - Needs both DD and QC to lose, they play the weakest opponent rank wise in Dakota(#11).
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
I think at this point only QC, DD, and SF have a shot at #1.
QC - Should only need to win vs MEM(#9)
DD - Needs to win vs Tampa(#5)and hope for a QC loss. Could potentially jump QC if the gap is close with a win over a stronger opponent.
SF - Needs both DD and QC to lose, they play the weakest opponent rank wise in Dakota(#11).
We literally have to be within a couple points of each other because you passed us on a playoff game... where we beat MEM.
I think at this point only QC, DD, and SF have a shot at #1.
QC - Should only need to win vs MEM(#9)
DD - Needs to win vs Tampa(#5)and hope for a QC loss. Could potentially jump QC if the gap is close with a win over a stronger opponent.
SF - Needs both DD and QC to lose, they play the weakest opponent rank wise in Dakota(#11).
We literally have to be within a couple points of each other because you passed us on a playoff game... where we beat MEM.
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by Homage
We literally have to be within a couple points of each other because you passed us on a playoff game... where we beat MEM.
It has to be razor thin or a win over a top 5 opponent carries a lot more weight than we thought. That's the only reason I think I may be within striking distance of QC since we jumped them until they beat Maine.
We literally have to be within a couple points of each other because you passed us on a playoff game... where we beat MEM.
It has to be razor thin or a win over a top 5 opponent carries a lot more weight than we thought. That's the only reason I think I may be within striking distance of QC since we jumped them until they beat Maine.
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
It has to be razor thin or a win over a top 5 opponent carries a lot more weight than we thought. That's the only reason I think I may be within striking distance of QC since we jumped them until they beat Maine.
I think we're all really close lol
It has to be razor thin or a win over a top 5 opponent carries a lot more weight than we thought. That's the only reason I think I may be within striking distance of QC since we jumped them until they beat Maine.
I think we're all really close lol
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
I think at this point only QC, DD, and SF have a shot at #1.
QC - Should only need to win vs MEM(#9)
DD - Needs to win vs Tampa(#5)and hope for a QC loss. Could potentially jump QC if the gap is close with a win over a stronger opponent.
SF - Needs both DD and QC to lose, they play the weakest opponent rank wise in Dakota(#11).
oh shit i thought SF played NJ. Well ya I guess we definitely need both of you to lose then.
I think at this point only QC, DD, and SF have a shot at #1.
QC - Should only need to win vs MEM(#9)
DD - Needs to win vs Tampa(#5)and hope for a QC loss. Could potentially jump QC if the gap is close with a win over a stronger opponent.
SF - Needs both DD and QC to lose, they play the weakest opponent rank wise in Dakota(#11).
oh shit i thought SF played NJ. Well ya I guess we definitely need both of you to lose then.
Parab00n
offline
offline
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/76038/3437583
Should be a top play for sure, great game Tampa!
Should be a top play for sure, great game Tampa!
Originally posted by Parab00n
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/76038/3437583
Should be a top play for sure, great game Tampa!
Request denied. HB not Twerk.
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/76038/3437583
Should be a top play for sure, great game Tampa!
Request denied. HB not Twerk.
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by AirMcMVP
Request denied. HB not Twerk.
pfft, The Force has been holding down those top runs the past couple weeks.
Request denied. HB not Twerk.
pfft, The Force has been holding down those top runs the past couple weeks.
Any chance this offseason we can get ELO shown?
I believe you that it is unfair (probably because playing someone lower than you is not as helpful as playing someone higher than you) - but if we had ELO and the way it is calculated - it would be interesting.
Plus - it would give most of the posters something to whine, bitch and complain about during the offseason -- possibly preventing a roit in some other area.
So: Please to be releasing ELO and how it is calculated to keep us distracted this off season (wag the dog)
I believe you that it is unfair (probably because playing someone lower than you is not as helpful as playing someone higher than you) - but if we had ELO and the way it is calculated - it would be interesting.
Plus - it would give most of the posters something to whine, bitch and complain about during the offseason -- possibly preventing a roit in some other area.
So: Please to be releasing ELO and how it is calculated to keep us distracted this off season (wag the dog)
rivergato
offline
offline
Originally posted by Parab00n
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/76038/3437583
Should be a top play for sure, great game Tampa!
That play destroyed any love i had for my FS...
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/76038/3437583
Should be a top play for sure, great game Tampa!
That play destroyed any love i had for my FS...
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























