So we have some idea what the hell defense we will be running on Trips plays.
Forum > Suggestions > Add defensive plays for Trips to the PB
Originally posted by glwarriors
Yeah - because Trips is just like Singleback or Shotgun right?
plz
use better plays
Yeah - because Trips is just like Singleback or Shotgun right?
plz
use better plays
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by glwarriors
Yeah - because Trips is just like Singleback or Shotgun right?
plz
Just work your playbook around it. It's not broken by any means...
Yeah - because Trips is just like Singleback or Shotgun right?
plz
Just work your playbook around it. It's not broken by any means...
Xavori
offline
offline
Originally posted by Adderfist
Just work your playbook around it. It's not broken by any means...
It is if you're playing zone defense
Just work your playbook around it. It's not broken by any means...
It is if you're playing zone defense
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xavori
It is if you're playing zone defense
If you're playing zone you're going to lose anyway. Zones are trash and believe me. I try to make them work.
It is if you're playing zone defense
If you're playing zone you're going to lose anyway. Zones are trash and believe me. I try to make them work.
bhall43
offline
offline
Zones just need a couple of guys to be in man coverage at least. The Zones should just be trying to force a QB to either go through progressions and find a better target or take their chances with a heavy area of defenders. Should reward DC's for scouting lazy OC's...like me.
bhall43
offline
offline
Like this whole fad of throwing the under routes. It would be nice to have a play where the Safeties or someone is playing under zones both strong and weak 4th's while there is still the same man coverage on the WR's. This forces a deep pass instead and gives the dline time to actually do something in a play.
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Like this whole fad of throwing the under routes. It would be nice to have a play where the Safeties or someone is playing under zones both strong and weak 4th's while there is still the same man coverage on the WR's. This forces a deep pass instead and gives the dline time to actually do something in a play.
That's still a man play with a different "shell". The fact of the matter is even with zones the comeback plays work EXACTLY THE SAME. Zone is broken. If you try and argue otherwise you either have bad information or are trying to get more epeople to play zone because it's bad.
EDIT: that's a royal "you". Not pointed at you bhall.
Like this whole fad of throwing the under routes. It would be nice to have a play where the Safeties or someone is playing under zones both strong and weak 4th's while there is still the same man coverage on the WR's. This forces a deep pass instead and gives the dline time to actually do something in a play.
That's still a man play with a different "shell". The fact of the matter is even with zones the comeback plays work EXACTLY THE SAME. Zone is broken. If you try and argue otherwise you either have bad information or are trying to get more epeople to play zone because it's bad.
EDIT: that's a royal "you". Not pointed at you bhall.
Edited by Adderfist on Mar 27, 2014 17:51:02
Xavori
offline
offline
Originally posted by Adderfist
If you're playing zone you're going to lose anyway. Zones are trash and believe me. I try to make them work.
Hence the great big smiley on my post.
Not that it's stopped me from playing 100% zone D with my rookie team, mind you. But I haz grand experiment going on there.
If you're playing zone you're going to lose anyway. Zones are trash and believe me. I try to make them work.
Hence the great big smiley on my post.
Not that it's stopped me from playing 100% zone D with my rookie team, mind you. But I haz grand experiment going on there.
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xavori
Hence the great big smiley on my post.
Not that it's stopped me from playing 100% zone D with my rookie team, mind you. But I haz grand experiment going on there.
lol I know. It's the same one I decided not to run. Thanks for testing it for me btw.
Hence the great big smiley on my post.
Not that it's stopped me from playing 100% zone D with my rookie team, mind you. But I haz grand experiment going on there.
lol I know. It's the same one I decided not to run. Thanks for testing it for me btw.
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xavori
Hence the great big smiley on my post.
Not that it's stopped me from playing 100% zone D with my rookie team, mind you. But I haz grand experiment going on there.
Is this the "errbody takes monster hit and 50+ power tackling" strategy? It's a fun idea.
Hence the great big smiley on my post.
Not that it's stopped me from playing 100% zone D with my rookie team, mind you. But I haz grand experiment going on there.
Is this the "errbody takes monster hit and 50+ power tackling" strategy? It's a fun idea.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
