Is there a way to change how many players you want at each position on my teams roster?
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Roster Size
Originally posted by Rikkhen
Is there a way to change how many players you want at each position on my teams roster?
there is no way to change the suggested position counts, but you don't have to follow those exactly.
Is there a way to change how many players you want at each position on my teams roster?
there is no way to change the suggested position counts, but you don't have to follow those exactly.
Originally posted by Rikkhen
Thanks DD. Will that feature be added by chance?
probably not, since we're going to keep the max roster size at 43 and they are just suggestions.
my ocd doesn't like being "red" on posititions, so i feel ya
Thanks DD. Will that feature be added by chance?
probably not, since we're going to keep the max roster size at 43 and they are just suggestions.
my ocd doesn't like being "red" on posititions, so i feel ya
Edited by DigitalDaggers on Feb 4, 2014 19:30:17
Originally posted by DigitalDaggers
probably not, since we're going to keep the max roster size at 43 and they are just suggestions.
my ocd doesn't like being "red" on posititions, so i feel ya
I like the idea of option lowering the cap on certain positions, simply because it makes auto fill more intelligent rather than signing 4 FSs, 4 DTs, 3 CBs and 2 LBs. It would also help free agents tell the team philosophy and stuff assuming they set it.
Though, then an intuitive interface needs added, and my interface intuition is awfully low.
probably not, since we're going to keep the max roster size at 43 and they are just suggestions.
my ocd doesn't like being "red" on posititions, so i feel ya
I like the idea of option lowering the cap on certain positions, simply because it makes auto fill more intelligent rather than signing 4 FSs, 4 DTs, 3 CBs and 2 LBs. It would also help free agents tell the team philosophy and stuff assuming they set it.
Though, then an intuitive interface needs added, and my interface intuition is awfully low.
Edited by Corndog on Feb 4, 2014 19:34:05
Rikkhen
offline
offline
Just noticed my roster had 4 qb 4 hb and 8 wr. With no way to control who signs the auto fill button isnt the way to go because anyone can sign. Would be nice to set a limit like we can on glb1
Rikkhen
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
I like the idea of lowering the cap on certain positions, simply because it makes auto fill more intelligent rather than signing 4 FSs, 4 DTs, 3 CBs and 2 LBs
Exactly. I cant leave the auto fill button on because if dots sign i dont need i will have to cut them and that will just make them mad and make me an ass for cutting them
I like the idea of lowering the cap on certain positions, simply because it makes auto fill more intelligent rather than signing 4 FSs, 4 DTs, 3 CBs and 2 LBs
Exactly. I cant leave the auto fill button on because if dots sign i dont need i will have to cut them and that will just make them mad and make me an ass for cutting them
Edited by Rikkhen on Feb 4, 2014 19:35:27
Then you gotta be a dick and cut players, it would be nice to change position caps.
Originally posted by Rikkhen
Exactly. I cant leave the auto fill button on because if dots sign i dont need i will have to cut them and that will just make them mad and make me an ass for cutting them
don't let mad people hold you back from success.
Exactly. I cant leave the auto fill button on because if dots sign i dont need i will have to cut them and that will just make them mad and make me an ass for cutting them
don't let mad people hold you back from success.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by DeeVee8
Then you gotta be a dick and cut players, it would be nice to change position caps.
Changing position caps just allows people to do stupid things like run a team with 43 QB's.
Then you gotta be a dick and cut players, it would be nice to change position caps.
Changing position caps just allows people to do stupid things like run a team with 43 QB's.
Adderfist
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
I like the idea of option lowering the cap on certain positions, simply because it makes auto fill more intelligent rather than signing 4 FSs, 4 DTs, 3 CBs and 2 LBs. It would also help free agents tell the team philosophy and stuff assuming they set it.
Though, then an intuitive interface needs added, and my interface intuition is awfully low.
Please do this. It would help so so much.
I like the idea of option lowering the cap on certain positions, simply because it makes auto fill more intelligent rather than signing 4 FSs, 4 DTs, 3 CBs and 2 LBs. It would also help free agents tell the team philosophy and stuff assuming they set it.
Though, then an intuitive interface needs added, and my interface intuition is awfully low.
Please do this. It would help so so much.
Originally posted by bhall43
Changing position caps just allows people to do stupid things like run a team with 43 QB's.
What? lol
Changing position caps just allows people to do stupid things like run a team with 43 QB's.
What? lol
peeti
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Changing position caps just allows people to do stupid things like run a team with 43 QB's.
He was Talking about lowering the caps...
Changing position caps just allows people to do stupid things like run a team with 43 QB's.
He was Talking about lowering the caps...
Badhands
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
Changing position caps just allows people to do stupid things like run a team with 43 QB's.
Like Punter Academy, but super expensive. Aside from being "stupid," what's your objection to something like that?
Changing position caps just allows people to do stupid things like run a team with 43 QB's.
Like Punter Academy, but super expensive. Aside from being "stupid," what's your objection to something like that?
Originally posted by Badhands
Like Punter Academy, but super expensive. Aside from being "stupid," what's your objection to something like that?
Well, if we were dumb enough to change things to make that possible, it ruins the game for everyone that plays them. And in GLB's case, breaks the sim and causes the server to crash.
Like Punter Academy, but super expensive. Aside from being "stupid," what's your objection to something like that?
Well, if we were dumb enough to change things to make that possible, it ruins the game for everyone that plays them. And in GLB's case, breaks the sim and causes the server to crash.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
