I say coverage LB. I have one and am having to spread my SPs very thin. I need to upgrade, speed, quickness, tackling, pass coverage, block shedding, pursuit, snap reaction, conditioning, toughness, etc...
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Game Help > What position is the toughest to build?
bhall43
offline
offline
If you tried to make your player the jack of all trades you could say that for any position. EVEN KICKER and PUNTER.
Ancient Sith Lord
offline
offline
I disagree. Kicker or punter...you concentrate on what...3 or 4 things? LB has so much responsibility. Obviously some skills will be higher priority than others, but I think LBs has to have the largest "functioning" skill set.
Unless your LB is a dedicated pass rusher.
Unless your LB is a dedicated pass rusher.
Edited by nortobc on Feb 4, 2014 14:27:31
Edited by nortobc on Feb 4, 2014 14:26:50
bhall43
offline
offline
If Coverage LB was a more viable build currently in this game which right now it really is kinda meh, you really wouldn't have to concentrate on half the skills you mention. But you are taking a jack of all trades approach which isn't really a coverage LB. imo.
all of them. idk if i wanna make them black or white. not sure how it effects the attributes.
chronicbomb
offline
offline
i've been tryin g to build pass rushing dt who can hold against the run. i've been having a bit of trouble there
Originally posted by nortobc
I say coverage LB. I have one and am having to spread my SPs very thin. I need to upgrade, speed, quickness, tackling, pass coverage, block shedding, pursuit, snap reaction, conditioning, toughness, etc...
you rly ONLY need man awr, cov tech, quickness and sprinting (ATM),
but keep building watever that thing u say your building is, im sure you will get it one of these days... Or you will get cut from the team, whichever comes first..
Originally posted by chronicbomb
i've been tryin g to build pass rushing dt who can hold against the run. i've been having a bit of trouble there
What atts are you raising?
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
all of them. idk if i wanna make them black or white. not sure how it effects the attributes.
If you are building a QB you better pick Ivory.
I say coverage LB. I have one and am having to spread my SPs very thin. I need to upgrade, speed, quickness, tackling, pass coverage, block shedding, pursuit, snap reaction, conditioning, toughness, etc...
you rly ONLY need man awr, cov tech, quickness and sprinting (ATM),
but keep building watever that thing u say your building is, im sure you will get it one of these days... Or you will get cut from the team, whichever comes first..
Originally posted by chronicbomb
i've been tryin g to build pass rushing dt who can hold against the run. i've been having a bit of trouble there
What atts are you raising?
Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
all of them. idk if i wanna make them black or white. not sure how it effects the attributes.
If you are building a QB you better pick Ivory.
Edited by Jampy2.0 on Feb 4, 2014 16:08:09
McGruffHawk
offline
offline
I have found TE's to be very difficult. You can't make a receiving TE, because the depth chart forces you to block, and you can't make a blocking TE because the AI won't let you hold back the TE . . . so you've got to shade one way or another and hope for the best.
hoshdude7
offline
offline
Originally posted by McGruffHawk
I have found TE's to be very difficult. You can't make a receiving TE, because the depth chart forces you to block, and you can't make a blocking TE because the AI won't let you hold back the TE . . . so you've got to shade one way or another and hope for the best.
Best to just go balanced but lean more on the receiving side imo
I have found TE's to be very difficult. You can't make a receiving TE, because the depth chart forces you to block, and you can't make a blocking TE because the AI won't let you hold back the TE . . . so you've got to shade one way or another and hope for the best.
Best to just go balanced but lean more on the receiving side imo
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by hoshdude7
Best to just go balanced but lean more on the receiving side imo
Or in the case of my team, completely on the receiving side. All depends on what your OC wants you to do.
Best to just go balanced but lean more on the receiving side imo
Or in the case of my team, completely on the receiving side. All depends on what your OC wants you to do.
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
If Coverage LB was a more viable build currently in this game which right now it really is kinda meh, you really wouldn't have to concentrate on half the skills you mention. But you are taking a jack of all trades approach which isn't really a coverage LB. imo.
Preeeeeeety sure "Coverage LB" = Hard Hitting FF Build.
If Coverage LB was a more viable build currently in this game which right now it really is kinda meh, you really wouldn't have to concentrate on half the skills you mention. But you are taking a jack of all trades approach which isn't really a coverage LB. imo.
Preeeeeeety sure "Coverage LB" = Hard Hitting FF Build.
pottsman
offline
offline
Originally posted by Jampy2.0
coverage lb = LB built as CB w/ more deflect
GLB1 and probably future GLB2
Originally posted by Laggo
coverage lb = blitzer if you are trying to win right now. Lol
GLB2 now = blitz every down.
coverage lb = LB built as CB w/ more deflect
GLB1 and probably future GLB2
Originally posted by Laggo
coverage lb = blitzer if you are trying to win right now. Lol
GLB2 now = blitz every down.
McGruffHawk
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
Or in the case of my team, completely on the receiving side. All depends on what your OC wants you to do.
Even the, do you go with a big slot receiver, with skills based on moving the chains with the tough catch, or with the glorified WR to stretch the seem and run the deep post? Because most formations will feature the TE in both ways, but can you do both at a high enough level to be effective?
I just think with TE's you have to have some blocking, some possession, some deep threat . . . and that makes them like linebackers on offense. Unless your offense is built entirely around a certain play type, you are pretty much forced into a jack knife build.
Or in the case of my team, completely on the receiving side. All depends on what your OC wants you to do.
Even the, do you go with a big slot receiver, with skills based on moving the chains with the tough catch, or with the glorified WR to stretch the seem and run the deep post? Because most formations will feature the TE in both ways, but can you do both at a high enough level to be effective?
I just think with TE's you have to have some blocking, some possession, some deep threat . . . and that makes them like linebackers on offense. Unless your offense is built entirely around a certain play type, you are pretty much forced into a jack knife build.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
