Warrior General Games

As it sits on the defense, DT is the only position that cannot be played by a player of another position. For example, both LB's and DE's can be set to play DE on the depth chart, and the same goes for LB's and SS's at LB. Since we can do these things, we should be able to set DE's to play DT if we so choose.

-1

So no one likes it, but no one's explaining why?

You will see this throughout GLB. Trolls will come and -1 your thread even if it makes sense. Just ask Jampy.

With the small roster sizes, this could be beneficial to those running a 3-4 defense if they have to field a 4 man front.

Originally posted by jdmfarmboy
With the small roster sizes, this could be beneficial to those running a 3-4 defense if they have to field a 4 man front.

this

Originally posted by jdmfarmboy
So no one likes it, but no one's explaining why?

Do I need to explain why?

Just make a fking DT, they are even cheaper? What kinda suggestion is this.

Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
You will see this throughout GLB. Trolls will come and -1 your thread even if it makes sense. Just ask Jampy.

You will also see idiotic scrubs without trophies talking jazz. Just Ask Dead Raper

This wasn't really a shot at you. I was speaking about your Buff Pass Defense Thread. . .

Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
This wasn't really a shot at you. I was speaking about your Buff Pass Defense Thread. . .

I wasn't shooting at you either, scrubs without trophies love to talk jazz.

Technically, I should have a trophy. Might not be gold but it's whatever. I did more than what most teams couldn't do.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0

Do I need to explain why?

Just make a fking DT, they are even cheaper? What kinda suggestion is this.

I'm not looking to make a DE my full time DT. I just want to be able use a DE at DT on the depth chart. I can put LBs at DE. I can put SSs at LB. I can move S's to CB and CBs to S. Why can't I move my DE inside?

Originally posted by Reaper Of The Dead
Technically, I should have a trophy. Might not be gold but it's whatever. I did more than what most teams couldn't do.

No, you didn't win a season 1 rookie trophy with a team made up of only 3 people that you only had one player on, that makes you clueless didn't you know?

Originally posted by E-A-G-L-E-S
No, you didn't win a season 1 rookie trophy with a team made up of only 3 people that you only had one player on, that makes you clueless didn't you know?

Makes me oh so clueless.

Originally posted by E-A-G-L-E-S
No, you didn't win a season 1 rookie trophy with a team made up of only 3 people that you only had one player on, that makes you clueless didn't you know?

Can I get the appropriate specs for a team that constitutes being good? I would just like to get by all your failure excuses early this season.

Originally posted by bhall43
Can I get the appropriate specs for a team that constitutes being good? I would just like to get by all your failure excuses early this season.

Oh hey bhole I was just wondering when yous jump in.

Well believe it or not, I don't think these 1 (or two or three or four) man bands are bad teams, I just think the drop off from a one man band to a team of many agents is too much and it's clearly exploitable as a direct result of having extremely limited control over tactics. You want to win, buy a team and 40 players. If you want to greatly improve your chances of losing, sign a single player or two to a collaborative team with 30-40 different agents. But you have the egotist trait in the real so you can't agree to something that's become extremely obvious