can a current, S1 player, who will continue into S2, be somehow "upgraded" to a Superstar.... or can Superstars (ignoring the referral S1 opportunity) only be a newly made rookie come S2 using an agents filled Superstar bar????
Forum > FAQ's, Player Guides and Game Help > Superstars question
darkwingaa
offline
offline
Superstar is a trait you can give to a new player. Players can't be upgraded to Superstar status.
o The Boss x
offline
offline
From my understanding only S2 Rookie, there's a cut-off that will remove the 'experienced' box so you won't be able to create an experienced superstar for this season.
Originally posted by darkwingaa
Superstar is a trait you can give to a new player. Players can't be upgraded to Superstar status.
Superstar is a trait you can give to a new player. Players can't be upgraded to Superstar status.
Who has done the math? Is a freshman superstar essentially equal to a sophomore point wise?
Time Trial
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
Who has done the math? Is a freshman superstar essentially equal to a sophomore point wise?
No.
Who has done the math? Is a freshman superstar essentially equal to a sophomore point wise?
No.
Superstars have 150% of the salary of a non Superstar....so it depends on the position(s) of the Superstar(s) as salaries vary by position...and it would also depend on how many players are on the roster and their salaries....
McGruffHawk
offline
offline
Originally posted by DEVIL HALL
How many superstar players could be in a team as they cost more salary room?
Too many unknown variables to answer.
How many superstar players could be in a team as they cost more salary room?
Too many unknown variables to answer.
Merik
offline
offline
Originally posted by DEVIL HALL
How many superstar players could be in a team as they cost more salary room?
many if you like superstar punters
and monty it's +150% wage..... not 150% of the wage
How many superstar players could be in a team as they cost more salary room?
many if you like superstar punters
and monty it's +150% wage..... not 150% of the wage
good point Merik....
here Borts quote from FAQ: However, they also cost +150% more towards a team's salary cap, so it is difficult to fit many of them on a team.
So, my original thought was that (example) if a non SS salary was 100k, a SS at that position would be 150K....
or did I assume wrongly....and in reality would it be non SS 100k, SS 250k?
here Borts quote from FAQ: However, they also cost +150% more towards a team's salary cap, so it is difficult to fit many of them on a team.
So, my original thought was that (example) if a non SS salary was 100k, a SS at that position would be 150K....
or did I assume wrongly....and in reality would it be non SS 100k, SS 250k?
Edited by Monty Burns on Jan 26, 2014 06:23:28
I guess a somewhat related question would be 150% of what?....the low or medium or high salary at that position?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.






























