User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Monty Burns
Crusty Old Fart
online
Link
 
can a current, S1 player, who will continue into S2, be somehow "upgraded" to a Superstar.... or can Superstars (ignoring the referral S1 opportunity) only be a newly made rookie come S2 using an agents filled Superstar bar????
 
darkwingaa
offline
Link
 
Superstar is a trait you can give to a new player. Players can't be upgraded to Superstar status.
 
o The Boss x
offline
Link
 
From my understanding only S2 Rookie, there's a cut-off that will remove the 'experienced' box so you won't be able to create an experienced superstar for this season.
 
Dämon
666
offline
Link
 
No can't be upgraded
 
drake262
loldrake
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by darkwingaa
Superstar is a trait you can give to a new player. Players can't be upgraded to Superstar status.


 
Monty Burns
Crusty Old Fart
online
Link
 
THANKS....
 
TxSteve
Not A Mod
offline
Link
 
Who has done the math? Is a freshman superstar essentially equal to a sophomore point wise?
 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TxSteve
Who has done the math? Is a freshman superstar essentially equal to a sophomore point wise?


No.
 
DEVIL HALL
offline
Link
 
How many superstar players could be in a team as they cost more salary room?
 
Monty Burns
Crusty Old Fart
online
Link
 
Superstars have 150% of the salary of a non Superstar....so it depends on the position(s) of the Superstar(s) as salaries vary by position...and it would also depend on how many players are on the roster and their salaries....
 
McGruffHawk
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DEVIL HALL
How many superstar players could be in a team as they cost more salary room?


Too many unknown variables to answer.
 
Merik
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by DEVIL HALL
How many superstar players could be in a team as they cost more salary room?


many if you like superstar punters

and monty it's +150% wage..... not 150% of the wage
 
Monty Burns
Crusty Old Fart
online
Link
 
good point Merik....

here Borts quote from FAQ: However, they also cost +150% more towards a team's salary cap, so it is difficult to fit many of them on a team.

So, my original thought was that (example) if a non SS salary was 100k, a SS at that position would be 150K....
or did I assume wrongly....and in reality would it be non SS 100k, SS 250k?
Edited by Monty Burns on Jan 26, 2014 06:23:28
 
peeti
offline
Link
 
Im an idiot
Edited by peeti on Jan 26, 2014 06:50:00
 
Monty Burns
Crusty Old Fart
online
Link
 
I guess a somewhat related question would be 150% of what?....the low or medium or high salary at that position?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.