Warrior General Games

I think the way Superstars are supposed to work is you can get 1 of each 150,100,50 Flex point position at a time.

What I'm suggesting is being able to use your 150 flex superstar on a 100 flex position if you have the 150er one unlocked. It'll only work down and not up. So people can't use 3 150 Flex cost superstars.

Basically I'm suggesting that when you unlock a superstar slot it doesn't lock you in to it's maximum cost, and gives you the ability to use that superstar on a cheaper flex cost position as long as both levels are unlocked.

Example, I unlock the 150 flexer and the 50 flexer. I can use the 150 superstar flexor to make a superstar Guard, but not a superstar DE (which hasn't been unlocked yet). At the same time I can use my 50 flexer superstar on another guard, but I can't use it on a HB.

That kinda thing.

lol...
So you learned how to build a 100 flex player, and instead of making a SS on the position you know, you want to make it on a guard?



This is a good option for lulzy ppl,
but it just does not make sense... It seems like Burt and Co. put the current system in order so people don't make superstars when they don't know how to build the player, then rage @ glb2 when what they have spent months playing just to unlock a superstar sucks worse than basic joes.

No it's more like I don't like to make HB's and QBs, especially since 90% of other users want to make those high profile type of players, so I'd have to make a Superstar LB in that situation. That's extremely limiting in my opinion.

If I'm allowed to only make 3 superstars, I'd like to enjoy making those 3 superstars. I don't see the downside of choosing to use a more expensive superstar spot to make a lower profile position superstar

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
It seems like Burt and Co. put the current system in order so people don't make superstars when they don't know how to build the player, then rage @ glb2 when what they have spent months playing just to unlock a superstar sucks worse than basic joes.



Has nothing to do with knowing how to build the dot and everything to do with rewarding people for spending flex.

Originally posted by Fumanchuchu


Has nothing to do with knowing how to build the dot and everything to do with rewarding people for spending flex.

Then superstars would cost 500 flex and would be available to all after the first season.

It's a mix between both (of course with a lean toward $),
don't be daft, if people built superstars that sucked they would retire them faster than they would an average player.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
lol...
So you learned how to build a 100 flex player, and instead of making a SS on the position you know, you want to make it on a guard


I know you aren't very smart, but can you at least learn to read and comprehend a little better?

Example clearly states that you can only go downward to positions you've unlocked already. Therefore, still building a position he knows how to read.

Originally posted by TehKyou


Example, I unlock the 150 flexer and the 50 flexer. I can use the 150 superstar flexor to make a superstar Guard, but not a superstar DE (which hasn't been unlocked yet). At the same time I can use my 50 flexer superstar on another guard, but I can't use it on a HB.

That kinda thing.

IMO this wouldn't be that bad tbh. so I'll +1 it.

+1

Oh yay +10 so far

Sounds like a good idea. The idea is obviously so that if you are rewarded with being able to build a superstar, you can actually build it at a position people need instead of building another superstar QB or HB like everyone else will be doing.

Originally posted by tpaterniti
Sounds like a good idea. The idea is obviously so that if you are rewarded with being able to build a superstar, you can actually build it at a position people need instead of building another superstar QB or HB like everyone else will be doing.

Yeah that was the intention.

Doesn't matter,

this isn't getting implemented anyway

This thread is suddenly so much better with the ignore function

Came into the thread because I was curious and I liked the idea so +1....



Leaving in love with the "ignore" feature

+1