If there is any interest, I was considering providing a power ranking of all the teams after every game. I just finished a new algorithm that I wanted to try out. It's purely mathematical so I'm sure it would give everyone plenty to debate. It takes into account 3 factors related to win % (win %, opponents win % and opponents opponents win %), 3 factors related to the rating on the matchup page (rating, average opponent rating, and opponents opponents average rating), as well as margin of victory. I'll run it after the first round and post my results, but would welcome any other comments as I may be refining the algorithm as we go.
RWCol2011
offline
offline
Make rankings for the Alpha and Zeta conference. Go to the Eastern Europe Pro forum and look how they do their rankings.
ig
offline
offline
Originally posted by RWCol2011
Make rankings for the Alpha and Zeta conference. Go to the Eastern Europe Pro forum and look how they do their rankings.
I'm going to stick with my formula just because I'm interested to see how it turns out, but I'd welcome any help and/or alternative rankings. I don't have a ton of time available, so I can't go into the depth I would like and look at all of the players on the teams, upsets, etc. My program is now set up to do the calculations automatically once I input teams' wins/losses and the ratings as they adjust, so it should be pretty painless to get the data out (although no accuracy is guaranteed).
Make rankings for the Alpha and Zeta conference. Go to the Eastern Europe Pro forum and look how they do their rankings.
I'm going to stick with my formula just because I'm interested to see how it turns out, but I'd welcome any help and/or alternative rankings. I don't have a ton of time available, so I can't go into the depth I would like and look at all of the players on the teams, upsets, etc. My program is now set up to do the calculations automatically once I input teams' wins/losses and the ratings as they adjust, so it should be pretty painless to get the data out (although no accuracy is guaranteed).
RWCol2011
offline
offline
Originally posted by iguazu_cn
Originally posted by RWCol2011
Make rankings for the Alpha and Zeta conference. Go to the Eastern Europe Pro forum and look how they do their rankings.
I'm going to stick with my formula just because I'm interested to see how it turns out, but I'd welcome any help and/or alternative rankings. I don't have a ton of time available, so I can't go into the depth I would like and look at all of the players on the teams, upsets, etc. My program is now set up to do the calculations automatically once I input teams' wins/losses and the ratings as they adjust, so it should be pretty painless to get the data out (although no accuracy is guaranteed).
ight thats cool
Originally posted by RWCol2011
Make rankings for the Alpha and Zeta conference. Go to the Eastern Europe Pro forum and look how they do their rankings.
I'm going to stick with my formula just because I'm interested to see how it turns out, but I'd welcome any help and/or alternative rankings. I don't have a ton of time available, so I can't go into the depth I would like and look at all of the players on the teams, upsets, etc. My program is now set up to do the calculations automatically once I input teams' wins/losses and the ratings as they adjust, so it should be pretty painless to get the data out (although no accuracy is guaranteed).
ight thats cool
Quack
offline
offline
I've seen point difference commonly used in Ranking algorithms - I don't know if you would want to include that (risk getting too complicated?) but I'm just trying to help.
Originally posted by cooljesture20
I'd love power rankings to be done, as long as there's no biased involved.
Agreed.
I'd love power rankings to be done, as long as there's no biased involved.
Agreed.
ig
offline
offline
Okay, I have two rankings--one considering margin of victory and the other not. These are obviously skewed towards the teams that won this week but should become more interesting in the next 2-3 weeks.
RANKINGS WITH POINT DIFFERENTIAL
WESTERN CONFERENCE
Rank Team (W-L) - Rating
1 Thundar Bay Bloodhounds (1-0) - 4.58
1 YellowKnife Bandits (1-0) - 4.58
3 Moose Jaw Blazers (1-0) - 4.53
4 Lethbridge Matadors (1-0) - 4.38
5 West Coast Trojans (1-0) - 4.18
6 Oh Canada Ehs (1-0) - 4.06
7 Saskatchewan Ducks (1-0) - 4.05
8 Victoria Dragons (1-0) - 3.83
9 New Jersey Hood (0-1) - 1.93
10 Prince George Bulls (0-1) - 1.58
11 Chilliwack Thrashers (0-1) - 1.33
11 Hill City Heat (0-1) - 1.33
13 Firth River Freeze (0-1) - 1.31
14 Saskatoon Spitfires (0-1) - 1.25
15 South Jersey RRR (0-1) - 1.05
16 Alberta Express (0-1) - 0.98
EASTERN CONFERENCE
Rank Team (W-L) - Rating
1 Lumberjack City Yaks (1-0) - 4.53
2 Edmonton Moose (1-0) - 4.46
3 Moose Jaw Mice (1-0) - 4.30
4 Willow Creek Phantoms (1-0) - 4.12
5 Paradise Cheeseburgers (1-0) - 3.90
6 Prince Edward Island Sharks (1-0) - 3.85
7 Medicine Hat Witch Doctors (1-0) - 3.77
8 Canadian Bacon (1-0) - 3.75
9 Vancouver Valiants (0-1) - 1.99
10 Halifax Fire (0-1) - 1.88
11 Aspermont Roughnecks (0-1) - 1.86
12 Sherbrook Colonels (0-1) - 1.78
13 Egyption Ratburgerer (0-1) - 1.52
14 Hudson Bay Trappers (0-1) - 1.46
15 District Challangers (0-1) - 0.98
16 Old Milwaukee Boob Punch (0-1) - 0.93
RANKINGS WITH POINT DIFFERENTIAL
WESTERN CONFERENCE
Rank Team (W-L) - Rating
1 Thundar Bay Bloodhounds (1-0) - 4.58
1 YellowKnife Bandits (1-0) - 4.58
3 Moose Jaw Blazers (1-0) - 4.53
4 Lethbridge Matadors (1-0) - 4.38
5 West Coast Trojans (1-0) - 4.18
6 Oh Canada Ehs (1-0) - 4.06
7 Saskatchewan Ducks (1-0) - 4.05
8 Victoria Dragons (1-0) - 3.83
9 New Jersey Hood (0-1) - 1.93
10 Prince George Bulls (0-1) - 1.58
11 Chilliwack Thrashers (0-1) - 1.33
11 Hill City Heat (0-1) - 1.33
13 Firth River Freeze (0-1) - 1.31
14 Saskatoon Spitfires (0-1) - 1.25
15 South Jersey RRR (0-1) - 1.05
16 Alberta Express (0-1) - 0.98
EASTERN CONFERENCE
Rank Team (W-L) - Rating
1 Lumberjack City Yaks (1-0) - 4.53
2 Edmonton Moose (1-0) - 4.46
3 Moose Jaw Mice (1-0) - 4.30
4 Willow Creek Phantoms (1-0) - 4.12
5 Paradise Cheeseburgers (1-0) - 3.90
6 Prince Edward Island Sharks (1-0) - 3.85
7 Medicine Hat Witch Doctors (1-0) - 3.77
8 Canadian Bacon (1-0) - 3.75
9 Vancouver Valiants (0-1) - 1.99
10 Halifax Fire (0-1) - 1.88
11 Aspermont Roughnecks (0-1) - 1.86
12 Sherbrook Colonels (0-1) - 1.78
13 Egyption Ratburgerer (0-1) - 1.52
14 Hudson Bay Trappers (0-1) - 1.46
15 District Challangers (0-1) - 0.98
16 Old Milwaukee Boob Punch (0-1) - 0.93
ig
offline
offline
RANKINGS WITHOUT POINT DIFFERENTIAL
WESTERN CONFERENCE
Rank Team (W-L) - Rating
1 YellowKnife Bandits (1-0) - 3.71
2 Victoria Dragons (1-0) - 3.63
3 Lethbridge Matadors (1-0) - 3.58
3 Saskatchewan Ducks (1-0) - 3.58
3 Thundar Bay Bloodhounds (1-0) - 3.58
6 Moose Jaw Blazers (1-0) - 3.53
7 West Coast Trojans (1-0) - 3.51
8 Oh Canada Ehs (1-0) - 3.46
9 Firth River Freeze (0-1) - 2.18
10 New Jersey Hood (0-1) - 2.13
11 Prince George Bulls (0-1) - 2.05
11 Saskatoon Spitfires (0-1) - 2.05
11 South Jersey RRR (0-1) - 2.05
14 Chilliwack Thrashers (0-1) - 2.00
15 Alberta Express (0-1) - 1.98
16 Hill City Heat (0-1) - 1.93
EASTERN CONFERENCE
Rank Team (W-L) - Rating
1 Medicine Hat Witch Doctors (1-0) - 3.63
1 Moose Jaw Mice (1-0) - 3.63
1 Paradise Cheeseburgers (1-0) - 3.63
4 Canadian Bacon (1-0) - 3.58
4 Prince Edward Island Sharks (1-0) - 3.58
4 Willow Creek Phantoms (1-0) - 3.58
7 Lumberjack City Yaks (1-0) - 3.53
8 Edmonton Moose (1-0) - 3.46
9 Aspermont Roughnecks (0-1) - 2.13
9 Hudson Bay Trappers (0-1) - 2.13
9 Vancouver Valiants (0-1) - 2.13
12 Egyption Ratburgerer (0-1) - 2.05
12 Halifax Fire (0-1) - 2.05
12 Sherbrook Colonels (0-1) - 2.05
15 District Challangers (0-1) - 1.98
16 Old Milwaukee Boob Punch (0-1) - 1.93
WESTERN CONFERENCE
Rank Team (W-L) - Rating
1 YellowKnife Bandits (1-0) - 3.71
2 Victoria Dragons (1-0) - 3.63
3 Lethbridge Matadors (1-0) - 3.58
3 Saskatchewan Ducks (1-0) - 3.58
3 Thundar Bay Bloodhounds (1-0) - 3.58
6 Moose Jaw Blazers (1-0) - 3.53
7 West Coast Trojans (1-0) - 3.51
8 Oh Canada Ehs (1-0) - 3.46
9 Firth River Freeze (0-1) - 2.18
10 New Jersey Hood (0-1) - 2.13
11 Prince George Bulls (0-1) - 2.05
11 Saskatoon Spitfires (0-1) - 2.05
11 South Jersey RRR (0-1) - 2.05
14 Chilliwack Thrashers (0-1) - 2.00
15 Alberta Express (0-1) - 1.98
16 Hill City Heat (0-1) - 1.93
EASTERN CONFERENCE
Rank Team (W-L) - Rating
1 Medicine Hat Witch Doctors (1-0) - 3.63
1 Moose Jaw Mice (1-0) - 3.63
1 Paradise Cheeseburgers (1-0) - 3.63
4 Canadian Bacon (1-0) - 3.58
4 Prince Edward Island Sharks (1-0) - 3.58
4 Willow Creek Phantoms (1-0) - 3.58
7 Lumberjack City Yaks (1-0) - 3.53
8 Edmonton Moose (1-0) - 3.46
9 Aspermont Roughnecks (0-1) - 2.13
9 Hudson Bay Trappers (0-1) - 2.13
9 Vancouver Valiants (0-1) - 2.13
12 Egyption Ratburgerer (0-1) - 2.05
12 Halifax Fire (0-1) - 2.05
12 Sherbrook Colonels (0-1) - 2.05
15 District Challangers (0-1) - 1.98
16 Old Milwaukee Boob Punch (0-1) - 1.93
RWCol2011
offline
offline
Cool man i think a good suggestion is to start a new thread titled like "Week 2 Power Rankings for West Conference" and then a East Conference one also for the next games
Last edited Jun 28, 2008 22:02:39
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.