Warrior General Games

It just wouldn't be right if we didn't have some conflicting rankings.

Lion Conference
Updated: 7/11/08

Rk.) Team - (Prev Rank) - Rating - (Record)

1.) Rwanda Royal Knights - (1) - 0.91666 - (15-0)

2.) Botswana Bugeaters - (2) - 0.80555 - (13-2)

3.) Cape Town White Sharks - (3) - 0.78124 - (12-2)

4.) Wolfenstein Werewolves - (4) - 0.71875 - (11-3)

5.) Mogadishu on Khat - (5) - 0.69444 - (11-4)

8.) Barbary Coast Pirates - (6) - 0.58333 - (9-6)

8.) Bamako Bite - (7) - 0.58333 - (9-6)

8.) Dar es Salaam Warrior Kings - (8) - 0.58333 - (9-6)

9.) Sun City Undertakers - (9) - 0.47222 - (7-8)

10.) Angola Spider Monkeez - (10) - 0.47222 - (7-8)

11.) Congo Gorillas - (12) - 0.30555 - (4-11)

12.) Djibouti Black Mambas - (11) - 0.30555 - (4-11)

13.) Cameroon Outlaws - (14) - 0.25 - (3-12)

14.) Sudan Snipers - (13) - 0.25 - (3-12)

15.) Burundi Scorpions - (15) - 0.19444 - (2-13)

16.) Gold Coast Raiders - (16) - 8.33333 - (0-15)



Elephant Conference
Updated: 7/11/08

Rk.) Team - (Prev Rank) - Rating - (Record)

1.) Conakry Coyotes - (1) - 0.91666 - (15-0)

5.) Cairo Emperors - (4) - 0.69444 - (11-4)

5.) Tsavo Maneaters - (5) - 0.69444 - (11-4)

5.) USAORG Legionnaires - (2) - 0.69444 - (11-4)

5.) Durban Donkeys - (3) - 0.69444 - (11-4)

7.) Zambia Hungry Hungry Hippos - (6) - 0.63888 - (10-5)

7.) Angola Blood Diamonds - (7) - 0.63888 - (10-5)

8.) Mali Mirage - (8) - 0.52777 - (8-7)

9.) West Coast Warriors - (9) - 0.47222 - (7-8)

11.) Babylon Bombshells - (12) - 0.41666 - (6-9)

11.) Togo Party - (10) - 0.41666 - (6-9)

12.) Namibia Slugs - (12) - 0.36111 - (5-10)

13.) Liberia Hornhuskers - (13) - 0.30555 - (4-11)

14.) Tangiers Cape Buffalo - (14) - 0.25000 - (3-12)

15.) Hounds of Anubis - (15) - 0.19444 - (2-13)

16.) Lake M'Zumba Cannibals - (16) - 0.06389 - (0-15)


Quick Note: You can read more about the Colley Matrix method at: http://www.colleyrankings.com/faq.html It's one of the better BCS computer ranking systems (though for the record, the BCS is the work of the devil.)

The Colley Matrix method does not accomodate 'ties' so all matches that result in a tie will not be considered in the calculations.

Sweet.

Bump. Shuffle, shuffle.

Pretty good...although we beat the donkeys.

Originally posted by SheVegas
Pretty good...although we beat the donkeys.

we beat mali mirage though, you lost to them. and they are ranked higher then both of us so i think we go on top for beating a harder opponent /shrug

i really have no clue but that makes sense

This is the most accurate "power rankings" I've seen yet.

Can we get a sticky?

Originally posted by saltman241
This is the most accurate "power rankings" I've seen yet.

The most interesting yes, accurate IDK; the not taking ties into effect does have a major bearing on the rankings. But, I would say that it is fair considering that we (Royal Knights) haven't yet faced any of the top 4 teams. We beat the Pirates, but IDK where they were ranked at the time we faced them. This does deserve a sticky.

Nice work.

sticky please

I ask for a sticky as well. Curious to see how well my self made formula will compare to a proven one at seasons end. Though I must admit.... mine has a lot of kinks to work out yet.

the colley matrix is great for early season rankings, but by the end of the season, once every team has played each other, the SoS component sort of falls out and it essentially becomes a ranking based on W-L.

now if someone can figure out a way to add some sort of modified Margin of Victory component to the matrix code . . .

I think it very cool that you have the Werewolves ranked as number 1.

With the way our offense is having troubles getting untracked, I have to wonder a bit about how your rankings are put together, but I think it seriously cool!

PinTBC

Originally posted by etonblue
the colley matrix is great for early season rankings, but by the end of the season, once every team has played each other, the SoS component sort of falls out and it essentially becomes a ranking based on W-L.

now if someone can figure out a way to add some sort of modified Margin of Victory component to the matrix code . . .

Thats why i want to see it at the end. Im using SoS, Win % and a margin of victory (avg scored - avg given up) and then some other things. I really want to see how it holds at the end.