Line Gen or Pancake?? which is better for a C
crawlins
offline
offline
Originally posted by 43Hitman
Line Gen by far. Heck, I'd rather have Get Low than Pancake.
I agree
Line Gen by far. Heck, I'd rather have Get Low than Pancake.
I agree
immagonnawin
offline
offline
My ideal build would have one Line General and one Get Low piece.
Then 1-1-1-2-4 (15 SP) in PB tree
And 3-5-0-0-0 (13 SP) in RB tree.
CEQ in RB tree.
1-1-1-2-9
4-11-1-1-1
That way you spend 28 SP total.
If you put all your EQP in one or the other you have to spend the extra SP getting it to 10.
for example, 0-0-0-0-10 PB 6-11-1-1-1 RB would cost 39 SP.
11 extra SP for:
1-1-1-2-1
2-0-0-0-0
If it's worth it for you, go for it.
Then 1-1-1-2-4 (15 SP) in PB tree
And 3-5-0-0-0 (13 SP) in RB tree.
CEQ in RB tree.
1-1-1-2-9
4-11-1-1-1
That way you spend 28 SP total.
If you put all your EQP in one or the other you have to spend the extra SP getting it to 10.
for example, 0-0-0-0-10 PB 6-11-1-1-1 RB would cost 39 SP.
11 extra SP for:
1-1-1-2-1
2-0-0-0-0
If it's worth it for you, go for it.
Edited by immagonnawin on Dec 15, 2009 18:36:42
immagonnawin
offline
offline
I'll add that if you want to go the LG-Pancake route, then it's a no doubter--one in LG, one in Pancake is a must.
0-0-0-0-10 (0 SP)
1-2-2-4-8 (39 SP)
vs.
1-1-1-2-9 (15 SP)
2-2-2-3-10 (15 SP)
essentially you save 9 SP and still get
1-1-1-2-(-1)
1-0-0-(-1)-2
0-0-0-0-10 (0 SP)
1-2-2-4-8 (39 SP)
vs.
1-1-1-2-9 (15 SP)
2-2-2-3-10 (15 SP)
essentially you save 9 SP and still get
1-1-1-2-(-1)
1-0-0-(-1)-2
PackMan97
offline
offline
Originally posted by Paulieb
Line Gen or Pancake?? which is better for a C
Line Gen, no doubt. Other piece should be a Hold Block%
Line Gen or Pancake?? which is better for a C
Line Gen, no doubt. Other piece should be a Hold Block%
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.